Comparison of several difference schemes on ID and 2D test problems for the euler equations

SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 995-1017

  Liska, Richard ^a   Wendroff, Burton ^b  

^a CZECH TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY IN PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

^b LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Euler equations; Finite difference schemes; Riemann problems; Splitting

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; HYDRODYNAMICS; LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

EULER EQUATIONS; FINITE DIFFERENCE SCHEMES; RIEMANN PROBLEMS; SPLITTING;

FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD;

EID: 1942511452     PISSN: 10648275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1137/S1064827502402120     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. M. ABOUZIAROV, On nonlinear amplification mechanism of instability near density discontinuities and shock waves for finite volume methods for Euler equations, in HYP 2002, The Ninth International Conference on Hyperbolic Problems: Theory, Numerics and Applications, Abstracts, T. Hou and E. Tadmor, eds., Caltech, Pasadena, CA, 2002, p. 162.
2. P. ARMINJON, D. STANESCU, AND M. VIALLON, A two-dimensional finite volume extension of the Lax-Friedrichs and Nessyahy-Tadmor schemes for compressible flows, in Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Computational Fluid Dynamics, Vol. 4, M. Hafez and K. Oshima, eds., Lake Tahoe, NV, 1995, pp. 7-14.
3. T. ASLAM, personal communication, 2001.
4. S. BILLETT AND E. TORO, On WAF-type schemes for multidimensional hyperbolic conservation laws, J. Comput. Phys., 130 (1997), pp. 1-24.
5. J. BLONDIN, VH-1: The Virginia Numerical Bull Session Ideal Hydrodynamics PPMLR, http://wonka.physics.ncsu.edu/pub/VH-1/index.html.
6. E. J. CARAMANA, D. E. BURTON, M. J. SHASHKOV, AND P. P. WHALEN, The construction of compatible hydrodynamics algorithms utilizing conservation of total energy, J. Comput. Phys., 146 (1998), pp. 227-262.
7. S. CHANG, X. WANG, AND C. CHOW, The space-time conservation element and solution element method: A new high resolution and genuinely multidimensional paradigm for solving conservation laws, J. Comput. Phys., 160 (1999), pp. 89-136.
8. P. COLELLA AND P. WOODWARD, The piecewise parabolic method (PPM) for gas-dynamical simulations, J. Comput. Phys., 54 (1984), pp. 174-201.
9. C. M. DAFERMOS, Hyperbolic Conservation Laws in Continuum Physics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991.
10. E. GODLEWSKI AND P.-A. RAVIART, Numerical Approximation of Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996.
11. P. GRESHO, On the theory of semi-implicit projection methods for viscous incompressible flow and its implementation via finite-element method that also introduces a nearly consistent mass matrix: Part 2: Applications, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 11 (1990), pp. 621-659.
12. J. GRESSIER AND J. M. MOSCHETTA, Robustness versus accuracy in shock-wave computations, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 33 (2000), pp. 313-332.
13. J. GROVE AND V. MOUSSEAU, personal communication, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 2000.
14. H. HANCHE-OLSEN, H. HOLDEN, AND K. A. LIE, Conservation Laws Preprint Server, http://www.math.ntnu.no/conservation.
15. A. HARTEN, The artificial compression method for computation of shocks and contact discontinuities: III. Self adjusting hybrid schemes, Math. Comp., 32 (1978), pp. 363-389.
16. A. HARTEN, B. ENGQUIST, S. OSHER, AND S. CHAKRAVARTHY, Uniformly high-order accurate essentially non-oscillatory schemes III, J. Comput. Phys., 71 (1987), pp. 231-303.
17. W. HUI, P. LI, AND Z. LI, A unified coordinate system for solving the two-dimensional Euler equations, J. Comput. Phys., 153 (1999), pp. 596-637.
18. G.-S. JIANG AND E. TADMOR, Nonoscillatory central schemes for multidimensional hyperbolic conservation laws, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 19 (1998), pp. 1892-1917.
19. G.-S. JIANG AND C.-W. SHU, Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes, J. Comput. Phys., 126 (1996), pp. 202-228.
20. S. JIN AND Z. XIN, The relaxation schemes for systems of conservation laws in arbitrary space dimensions, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 48 (1995), pp. 235-276.
21. D. KRÖNER AND M. OHLBERGER, A posteriori error estimates for upwind finite volume schemes for nonlinear conservation laws in multi dimensions, Math. Comput., 69 (1999), pp. 25-39.
22. M. KUCHAŘÍK, personal communication, 2001.
23. A. KURGANOV AND E. TADMOR, Solution of Two-Dimensional Riemann Problems for Gas Dynamics without Riemann Problem Solvers, Technical report CAM 00-34, UCLA, Los Angeles, 2000.
24. C. LANEY, Computational Gasdynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1998.
25. P. D. LAX AND X.-D. LIU, Solution of two-dimensional Riemann problems of gas dynamics by positive schemes, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 19 (1998), pp. 319-340.
26. R. LEVEQUE, Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws, Birkhauser-Verlag, Basel, 1990.
27. R. J. LEVEQUE, High-resolution conservative algorithms for advection in incompressible flow, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 33 (1996), pp. 627-665.
28. R. LEVEQUE, Wave propagation algorithms for multi-dimensional hyperbolic systems, J. Comput. Phys., 131 (1997), pp. 327-353.
29. R. LEVEQUE, Clawpack Version 4.0 User's Guide, Technical report, University of Washington, Seattle, 1999. Available online at http://www.amath.washington.edu/~claw/.
30. R. LISKA AND B. WENDROFF, Composite schemes for conservation laws, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 35 (1998), pp. 2250-2271.
31. R. LISKA AND B. WENDROFF, Comparison of Several Difference Schemes on 1 d and 2d Test Problems for the Euler Equations, Technical report, Czech Technical University, Prague, 2002. Available online with animations at http://www-troja. fjfl.cvut.cz/~liska/CompareEuler/compare8.
32. X. LIU, personal communication, 2001.
33. X. LIU AND P. LAX, Positive schemes for solving multi-dimensional hyperbolic systems of conservation laws, Computational Fluid Dynamics Journal, 5 (1996), pp. 1-24. Available online at http://www.math.ucsb.edu/~xliu/ publication/paper/positive1.pdf.
34. K. W. MORTON, On the analysis of finite volume methods for evolutionary problems, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 35 (1998), pp. 2195-2222.
35. H. NESSYAHU AND E. TADMOR, Non-oscillatory central differencing for hyperbolic conservation laws, J. Comput. Phys., 87 (1990), pp. 408-463.
36. W. F. NOH, Errors for calculations of strong shocks using an artificial viscosity and artificial heat flux, J. Comput. Phys., 72 (1987), pp. 78-120.
37. J. QUIRK, An Adaptive Grid Algorithm for Computational Shock Hydrodynamics, Ph.D. thesis, College of Aeronautics, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK, 1991. Available online at http://www.galcit.caltech.edu/~jjq/doc/ amr_sol/thesis.
38. J. QUIRK, A contribution to the great Riemann solver debate, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 18 (1994), pp. 555-574.
39. J. QUIRK, personal communication, 2001.
40. W. J. RIDER, Revisiting wall heating, J. Comput. Phys., 162 (2000), pp. 395-410.
41. P. J. ROACHE, Computational Fluid Dynamics, Hermosa Publishers, Albuquerque, NM, 1976.
42. M. S. SAHOTA, P. J. O'ROURKE, AND M. C. CLINE, Assesment of Vorticity and Angular Momentum Errors in CHAD for the Gresho Problem, Technical report LA-UR-00-2217, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 2000.
43. C. W. SCHULZ-RINNE, J. P. COLLINS, AND H. M. GLAZ, Numerical solution of the Riemann problem for two-dimensional gas dynamics, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 14 (1993), pp. 1394-1414.
44. C. SHU AND S. OSHER, Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes II, J. Comput. Phys., 83 (1989), pp. 32-78.
45. C. W. SHU AND S. OSHER, Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes, J. Comput. Phys., 77 (1988), pp. 439-471.
46. J. SMOLLER, Shock Waves and Reaction Diffusion Equations, 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994.
47. G. A. SOD, A survey of several finite difference schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, J. Comput. Phys., 27 (1978), pp. 1-31.
48. G. STRANG, On the construction and comparison of difference schemes, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 5 (1968), pp. 506-517.
49. E. TORO, A weighted average flux method for hyperbolic conservation laws, Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A, 423 (1989), p. 401-418.
50. E. TORO, Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1997.
51. E. TORO, Numerica: A Library of Source Codes for Teaching, Research and Applications, 2000. Available online at http://www.numeritek.com/ numerica_software.html.
52. P. WOODWARD AND P. COLELLA, The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks, J. Comput. Phys., 54 (1984), pp. 115-173.
53. P. WOODWARD, S. E. ANDERSON, D. H. PORTER, I. QUESNELL, M. JACOBS, AND B. EDGAR, PPMLib Library, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 1999. Available online at http://www.lcse.umn.edu/PPMlib/.