Author bibliographic coupling: Another approach to citation-based author knowledge network analysis

Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting

Volumn 45, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Zhao, Dangzhi ^a   Strotmann, Andreas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 71949120966     PISSN: 15508390     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/meet.2008.1450450292     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Bassecoulard, E., Lelu, A., & Zitt, M. (2007). Mapping nanosciences by citation flows: A preliminary analysis. Scientometrics, 70(3), 859-880
2. Börner, K., Maru, J.T., & Goldstone, R.L. (2004). The simultaneous evolution of author and paper networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101 (SUPPL. 1), 5266-5273
3. Boyack, K., Börner, K., & Klavans, R. (2007). Mapping the Structure and Evolution of Chemistry Research. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, June 25-27, 2007, Madrid, Spain
4. Crane, D. (1972). Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2002). Co-citation, bibliographic coupling and a characterization of lattice citation networks. Scientometrics, 55(3), 349-361
6. Garfield, E. (1979). Citation Indexing - Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
7. Garvey, W.D. (1979). Communication: The Essence of Science. New York: Pergamon.
8. Glänzel, W. & Czerwon, H. J. (1996). A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level. Scientometrics, 37, 195-221.
9. Hair, J.F. Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10. Henzinger, M., & Lawrence, S. (2004). Extracting knowledge from the World Wide Web. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101 (SUPPL. 1), 5186-5191
11. Jarneving, B. (2005). A comparison of two bibliometric methods for mapping of the research front. Scientometrics, 65, 245-263
12. Jarneving, B. (2007). Bibliographic coupling and its application to research-front and other core documents. Journal of Informetrics, 1, 287-307
13. Kessler, M. M. (1963), Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14, 10-25.
14. Kuusi, O., & Meyer, M. (2007). Anticipating technological breakthroughs: Using bibliographic coupling to explore the nanotubes paradigm. Scientometrics, 70(3), 759-777
15. Lindsey, D. (1980). Production and citation measures in the sociology of science: The problem of multiple authorship. Social Studies of Science, 10, 145-162.
16. Long, J. S., McGinnis, R., & Allison, P. D. (1980). The problem of junior-authored papers in constructing citation counts. Social Studies of Science, 10, 127-143.
17. Mullins, N.C., Hargens, L.L., Hecht, P.K., & Kick, E.L. (1977). The group structure of co-citation clusters: A comparative study. American Sociological Review, 42, 552-562.
18. Schneider, J.W., Larsen, B., & Ingwersen, P. (2007). Comparative study between first and all-author cocitation analysis based on citation indexes generated from XML data. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, June 25-27, Madrid, Spain.
19. Shiffrin, R.M., & Börner, K. (2004). Mapping knowledge domains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101 (Suppl 1): 5183-5185
20. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24, 265-269.
21. Smith, L. C. (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30, 83-106.
22. Swanson, D.R. (1986). Two medical literatures that are logically but not bibliographically connected. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 38(4), 228-233
23. Weinberg, B.H. (1974). Bibliographic Coupling: A Review. Information Storage and Retrieval, 10(5/6), 189-96
24. White, H. D. (1990). Author co-citation analysis: Overview and defense. In C. L. Borgman (ed.), Scholarly communication and Bibliometrics (pp. 84-106). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25. White, H. D. (2001). Authors as citers over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 87-108
26. White, H. D., Buzydlowski, J. & Lin, X. (2000). Co-Cited Author Maps as Interfaces to Digital Libraries: Designing Pathfinder Networks in the Humanities. IEEE International Conference on Information Visualization. (London, July 18-22, 2000), pp 25-30.
27. White, H. D., & McCain, K.W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 327-355.
28. Zhao, D. (2006a). Towards all-author co-citation analysis. Information Processing & Management, 42: 1578-1591
29. Zhao, D. (2006b). Dispelling the myths behind straight citation counts. Information Realities: Shaping the Digital Future for All - Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2006 Annual Meeting, November 3 - 8, Austin, Texas, USA
30. Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2007). All-author vs. first-author co-citation analysis of the Information Science field using Scopus. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2007 Annual Meeting, October 19-24, 2007, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
31. Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2008). Information science in the first decade of the Web: An enriched author cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6): 916-937.