A hybrid selection model for emerging technology

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 77, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 151-166

  Shen, Yung Chi ^a   Chang, Shu Hsuan ^b   Lin, Grace T R ^a   Yu, Hsiao Cheng ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHANGHUA UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process; Fuzzy Delphi method; Organic light emitting diode; Patent co citation approach

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP); COCITATION; EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; FUZZY DELPHI METHOD; HYBRID SELECTION; KEY TECHNOLOGIES; MULTICRITERIA DECISION; TECHNOLOGY SELECTION;

ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DIODES (OLED);

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; DECISION MAKING; DELPHI ANALYSIS; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION;

EID: 71849101225     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. McNamara P., and Baden-Fuller C. Lessons from the Celltech Case: balancing knowledge exploration and exploitation in organisational renewal. Brit. J. Manage. 10 4 (1999) 291-307
2. Torkkeli M., and Tuominen M. The contribution of technology selection to core competencies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 77 3 (2002) 271-284
3. Yu O.S., Hsu G.J.Y., and Chen T.Y. Introduction to technological management: Technological forecast and planning (1998), Wu Nan Publishing Company, Taipei
4. Clark K. What strategy can do for technology. Harv. Bus. Rev. 67 6 (1989) 94-98
5. Morone J. Strategic use of technology. Calif. Manage. Rev. 31 4 (1989) 91-110
6. Lee Y.G., and Song Y.I. Selecting the key research areas in nano-technology field using technology cluster analysis: a case study based on national R&D programs in South Korea. Technovation 27 1-2 (2007) 57-64
7. Khalil T.M. Management of technology: The key to competitiveness and wealth creation (2000), Mcgraw-Hill, New York
8. Lamb M., and Gregory M.J. Industrial concerns in technology selection. Paper presented at the meeting of the Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, Portland, Ore. (1997)
9. Saaty T.L. The analytic hierarchy process (1980), Mcgraw-Hill, New York
10. Liu S., and Shyu J. Strategic planning for technology development with patent analysis. Int. J. Technol. Manage. 13 5/6 (1997) 661-680
11. Abraham B., and Morita S. Innovation assessment through patent analysis. Technovation 21 4 (2001) 245-252
12. Lai K.K., and Wu S.J. Using the patent co-citation approach to establish a new patent classification system. Inf. Process. Manage. 41 2 (2005) 313-330
13. Daim T.U., Rueda G., Martin H., and Gerdsri P. Forecasting emerging technologies: use of bibliometrics and patent analysis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 73 8 (2006) 981-1012
14. IEK. Opto-electronics industry yearbook (2006), Ministry of Economic Affairs, Taipei
15. Phaal R., Farrukh C.J.P., and Probert D.R. Technology management process assessment: a case study. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 21 8 (2001) 1116-1132
16. Gregory M.J. Technology management: a process approach. Proc. IME. B. J. Eng. Manufact. 209 5 (1995) 347-355
17. Dussauge P., Hart S., and Ramanatsoa B. Strategic technology management (1992), Wiley, New York
18. Stacey G.S., and Ashton W.B. A structured approach to corporate technology strategy. Int. J. Technol. Manage. 5 4 (1990) 389-407
19. Shehabuddeen N., Probert D., and Phaal R. From theory to practice: challenges in operationalising a technology selection framework. Technovation 26 3 (2006) 324-407
20. Berry M.M., and Taggart J.H. Managing technology and innovation: a review. R D Manage. 24 4 (1994) 341-353
21. Steensma K.H., and Fairbank J.F. Internalizing external technology: a model of governance mode choice and an empirical assessment. J. High Technol. Managem. Res. 10 1 (1999) 1-35
22. Lei D.T. Industry evolution and competence development: the imperatives of technological convergence. Int. J. Technol. Manage. 19 7/8 (2000) 699-735
23. Bakos Y. The productivity payoff of computers. In: Sichel D.E. (Ed). The Computer Revolution: An Economic Perspective (1998), Brookings Institute Press, Washington
24. Cantwell J. The internalization of technological activity and its implications for competitiveness. In: Grandstrand O., HakanSon L., and Sjolander S. (Eds). Technology Management and International Business: Internationalisation of R&D and Technology (1992), Wiley, New York
25. Hackett P.G. Investment in technology-the service sector sinkhole?. MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. 31 2 (1990) 97-103
26. Greenberg E., and Canzoneri C. Change management: A survey of major US corporation (1995), American Management Association, New York
27. Huang G.Q., and Mak K.L. Current practices of engineering change management in UK manufacturing industries. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 19 1 (1999) 21-37
28. Schroder R., and Sohal A.S. Organizational characteristics associated with AMT adoption: towards a contingency framework. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 19 12 (1999) 1270-1291
29. Efstathiades A., Tassou S.A., Oxinos G., and Antoniou A. Advanced manufacturing technology transfer and implementation in developing countries: the case of the Cypriot manufacturing industry. Technovation 20 2 (2000) 93-102
30. Khorramshahgol R., and Moustakis V.S. Delphic hierarchy process (DHP): a methodology for priority setting derived from the Delphi method and analytical hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 37 3 (1988) 347-354
31. Armacost R.L., Hosseini J.C., and Pet-Edwards J. Using the analytic hierarchy process as a two-phase integrated decision approach for large nominal groups. Group Decis. Negot. 8 6 (1999) 535-555
32. Baker N.R. R&D project selection models: an assessment. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 21 4 (1974) 165-171
33. Liberatore M.J., and Titus G.J. The practice management science in R&D project management. Manage. Sci. 29 (1983) 962-975
34. Schmidt R.L., and Freeland J.R. Recent progress in modeling R&D project selection process. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 39 2 (1992) 189-201
35. Dalkey N., and Helmer O. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manage. Sci. 9 3 (1963) 458-467
36. Lee J.W., and Kim S.H. An integrated approach for interdependent information system project selection. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 19 2 (2001) 111-118
37. Bañuls V.A., and Salmeron J.L. A scenario-based assessment model-SBAM. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 74 6 (2007) 750-762
38. Bañuls V.A., and Salmeron J.L. Foresighting key areas in the information technology industry. Technovation 28 3 (2008) 103-111
39. Chen H.H., Kang H.Y., Xing X., Lee A.H.I., and Tong Y. Developing new products with knowledge management methods and process development management in a network. Comput. Ind. 59 2-3 (2008) 242-253
40. Delbecq A.L., Van de Ven A.H., and Gustafson D.H. Group techniques for program planning (1975), Scott Foreman, Glenview
41. Osborne J., Collins S., Ratcliffe M., Millar R., and Duschl R. What "ideas-about-science" should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 40 7 (2003) 692-720
42. Cyphert F.R., and Grant W. The Delphi technique: a case study. Phi Delta Kappan 52 5 (1971) 272-273
43. Uhl N.P. Using the Delphi technique in institutional planning. New Dir. Inst. Res. 37 10 (1983) 81-94
44. Cochran S.W. The Delphi method: formulating and refining group judgments. J. Hum. Sci. 2 2 (1983) 111-117
45. Dailey A.L., and Holmberg J.C. Delphi: a catalytic strategy for motivating curriculum revision by faculty. Commun. Jr. Coll. Q. Res. Pract. 14 2 (1990) 129-136
46. Whitman N.I. The Delphi technique as an alternative for committee meetings. J. Nurs. Educ. 29 8 (1990) 377-379
47. van Zolingen S.J., and Klaassen C.A. Selection processes in a Delphi study about key qualifications in senior secondary vocational education. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 70 4 (2003) 317-340
48. Brooks K.W. Delphi techniques: expanding applications. North Cent. Assoc. Q. 53 3 (1979) 377-385
49. Martorella P. Consensus building among social educators: a Delphi study. Theory Res. Soc. Educ. 19 1 (1991) 83-94
50. Murry J.W., and Hammons J.O. Delphi: a versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research. Rev. High. Educ. 18 4 (1995) 423-436
51. Hwang C.L., and Lin M.J. Group decision making under multiple criteria: methods and applications (1987), Springer-Verlag, New York
52. Chang P.T., Huang L.C., and Lin H.J. The fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy statistics and membership function fitting and an application to the human resources. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 112 3 (2000) 511-520
53. Ishikawa A., Amagasa M., Shiga T., Tomizawa G., Tatsuta R., and Mieno H. The max-min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 35 3 (1993) 241-253
54. Klir G.J., and Folger T.A. Fuzzy sets uncertainty and information (1988), Prentice-Hall, New Jersey
55. Büyüközkan G. Multi-criteria decision making for e-marketplace selection. Internet Res. 14 2 (2004) 139-154
56. Hsu T.H. Public transport system project evaluation using the analytic hierarchy process: a fuzzy Delphi approach. Transp. Plan. Technol. 22 4 (1999) 229-246
57. Huang L.C., and Wu R.Y.H. Applying fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in the managerial talent assessment model - an empirical study in Taiwan's semiconductor industry. Int. J. Technol. Manage. 30 1-2 (2005) 105-130
58. Tran T.A., and Daim T. A taxonomic review of methods and tools applied in technology assessment. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 75 9 (2008) 1396-1405
59. Ramanujam V., and Saaty T.L. Technological choice in the less developed countries: an analytic hierarchy approach. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 19 1 (1981) 81-89
60. Prasad A.V.S., and Somasekhara N. The analytic hierarchy process for choice of technologies: an application. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 38 2 (1990) 151-158
61. Raju U.S., Rangaraj N., and Date A.W. The influence of development perspectives on the choice of technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 48 1 (1995) 27-43
62. Winebrake J.J., and Creswick B.P. The future of hydrogen fueling systems for transportation: an application of perspective-based scenario analysis using the analytic hierarchy process. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 70 4 (2003) 359-384
63. Sloane E.B. Using a decision support tool for healthcare technology assessment. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 23 3 (2004) 42-55
64. Malladi S., and Min K.J. Decision support models for the selection of internet access technologies in rural communities. Telemat. Inform. 22 3 (2005) 201-219
65. Hajeeh M., and Al-Othman A. Application of the analytical hierarchy process in the selection of desalination plants. Desalination 174 1 (2005) 97-108
66. Tolga E., Demircan M.L., and Kahraman C. Operating system selection using fuzzy replacement analysis and analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 97 1 (2005) 89-117
67. Wang K.M., Wang C.K., and Hu C. Analytic hierarchy process with fuzzy scoring in evaluating multidisciplinary R&D Projects in China. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 52 1 (2005) 119-129
68. Ronde P. Technological clusters with a knowledge-based principle: evidence from a Delphi investigation in the French case of the life sciences. Res. Policy 30 7 (2001) 1041-1057
69. Ronde P. Delphi analysis of national specificities in selected innovative areas in Germany and France. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 70 5 (2003) 419-448
70. Jaffe A.B. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: evidence from firms' patents, profits, and market value. Am. Econ. Rev. 76 5 (1986) 984-1001
71. Porter A.L., and Detampel M.J. Technology opportunities analysis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 49 3 (1995) 237-255
72. Verspagen B. Measuring intersectoral technology spillovers: estimates from the European and US Patent Office Databases. Econ. Syst. Res. 9 1 (1997) 47-65
73. Kostoff R.N., and Scaller R.R. Science and technology roadmaps. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 48 (2001) 132-143
74. In: Jaffe A.B., and Trajtenberg M. (Eds). Patents, citations, and innovations: A window on the knowledge economy (2002), MIT Press, Cambridge
75. Hufker T., and Alpert F. Patents: a managerial perspective. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 3 4 (1994) 44-54
76. Breitzman A., and Mogee M.E. The many applications of patent analysis. J. Inf. Sci. 28 3 (2002) 187-205
77. Mogee M.E. Patent analysis methods in support of licensing. Paper presented in Technology Transfer Society Annual Conference, Denver, Co. (1997)
78. Mogee M.E., and Kolar R.G. Patent co-citation analysis of Eli Lilly & Co. patents. Expert Opin. Ther. Patents 9 3 (1999) 291-305
79. Narin F. The strategic applications of technology indicators based on patent citation analysis. Pat. World (April, 1993)
80. Narin F., and Breitzman A. Inventive productivity. Res. Policy 24 4 (1995) 507-519
81. Narin F., Albert M., and Smith V. What patents tell you about your competition. CHEMTECH (February 1993) 52-59
82. Breitzman A., Thomas P., and Cheney M. Technological powerhouse or diluted competence: techniques for assessing mergers via patent analysis. R D Manage. 32 1 (2002) 1-10
83. Lev B. Intangibles management, measurement, and reporting (2001), Brookings Institution Press, Washington
84. Narin F., Noma E., and Perry R. Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Res. Policy 16 2-4 (1987) 143-155
85. Ernst H. The use of patent data for technological forecasting: the diffusion of CNC-technology in the machine tool industry. Small Bus. Econ. 9 4 (1997) 361-381
86. Archibugi D., and Pianta M. Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation 16 9 (1996) 451-468
87. Small H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 24 4 (1973) 265-269
88. Sharabchiev J.T. Cluster analysis of bibliographic references as a scientometrics method. Scientometrics 15 1-2 (1989) 127-137
89. White H.D., and McCain K.W. Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis in information science, 1992-1995. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 49 4 (1998) 327-356
90. Garfield E. ABCs of cluster mapping, Part 1, most active fields in the life sciences in 1978. Current Comments 40 (1980) 5-12
91. He Y., and Hui S.C. Mining a web citation database for author co-citation analysis. Inf. Process. Manage. 38 4 (2002) 491-508
92. Chen C.H., and Huang S.W. Organic electroluminescent materials & devices (2005), Taipei Wu Nan Publishing Company
93. Chen C.H., and Huang S.W. OLED: Materials and devices of dream displays (2007), Taipei Wu Nan Publishing Company
94. Arbel A., and Shapira Y. A decision framework for evaluating vacuum pumping technology. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 4 2 (1999) 387-411
95. Piipo P., and Tuominen M. Promoting innovation management by decision support systems: facilitating new products' relevance to the corporate objectives. In: Allesch J. (Ed). Consulting in Innovation: Practice-methods-perspectives (1990), Elsevier Science Publishers, Holland
96. Yap C., and Souder W. A filter system for technology evaluation and selection. Technovation 13 7 (1993) 449-469
97. Coldrick S., Longhurst P., Ivey P., and Hannis J. An R&D options selection model for investment decisions. Technovation, 25 3 (2005) 185-193
98. Huang C.C., Chu P.Y., and Chiang Y.H. A fuzzy AHP application in government-sponsored R&D project selection. Omega-Int. J. Manage. Sci. 36 6 (2008) 1038-1052
99. Ashton W.B., and Sen R.K. Using patent information in technology business planning-I. Res.-Technol. Manage. 31 6 (1988) 42-46
100. Bengisu M., and Nekhili R. Forecasting emerging technologies with the aid of science and technology database. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 73 7 (2006) 835-844
101. IEK. 2004 Opto-electronics industry yearbook (2004), Ministry of Economic Affairs, Taipei