Effects of framing, perspective taking, and perspective (affective focus) on choice

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 264-269

  Fagley, N S ^a   Coleman, Jennifer G ^b   Simon, Andrew F ^c  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WESTERN NEW MEXICO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SETON HALL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Affect; Decision making; Framing effect; Gain frame; Gender differences; Loss frame; Perspective taking; Risky choice

Indexed keywords

EID: 71749084012     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.10.008     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Andrew J., Cooke M., and Muncer S. The relationship between empathy and Machiavellianism: An alternative to empathizing - Systemizing theory. Personality and Individual Differences 44 (2008) 1203-1211
2. Bernstein L., Chapman G., and Elstein A. Framing effects in choices between multi outcome life-expectancy lotteries. Medical Decision Making 19 (1999) 324-338
3. Bloomfield A. Group size and the framing effect: Threats to human beings and animals. Memory and Cognition 34 (2006) 929-937
4. Brackett M., Rivers S., Shiffman S., Lerner N., and Salovey P. Relating emotional abilities to social functioning: A comparison of self-report and performance measures of emotional intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91 (2006) 780-795
5. Chang C. Interactive effects of message framing, product perceived risk, and mood - The case of travel healthcare product advertising. Journal of Advertising Research March (2007) 51-65
6. Duan C., and Hill C. The current state of empathy research. Journal of Counseling Psychology 43 (1996) 261-274
7. Epstein S. Cognitive-experiential self-theory. In: Barone D.F., Hersen M., and Van Hasselt V.B. (Eds). Advanced personality (1998), Plenum, New York 211-238
8. Fagley N., and Miller P.M. The effects of decision framing on choice of risky vs. certain options. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 39 (1987) 264-277
9. Fagley N., and Miller P.M. The effects of framing on choice: Interactions with risk-taking propensity, cognitive style, and sex. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 16 (1990) 496-510
10. Fagley N., and Miller P.M. Framing effects and arenas of choice: Your money or your life?. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 71 (1997) 355-373
11. Fischhoff B. Predicting frames. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 9 (1983) 103-116
12. Galinsky A., Maddux W., Gilin D., and White J. Why it pays to get inside the head of your opponent. Psychological Science 19 (2008) 378-384
13. Gorenflo D., and Crano W. The multiple perspectives inventory: A measure of perspective-taking. Swiss Journal of Psychology 57 (1998) 163-177
14. Hogan R. Development of an empathy scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 33 (1969) 307-316
15. Hynes C., Baird A., and Grafton S. Differential role of the orbital frontal lobe in emotional versus cognitive perspective-taking. Neuropsychologia 44 (2006) 374-383
16. Isen A., and Labroo A. Some ways in which positive affect facilitates decision making and judgment. In: Schneider S.L., and Shanteau J. (Eds). Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision making (2003), Cambridge University Press, New York
17. Johnson D.W. Cooperativeness and social perspective taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 31 (1975) 241-244
18. Kahneman D., and Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of choice under risk. Econometrica 47 (1979) 263-291
19. Kühberger A., Schulte-Mecklenbeck M., and Perner J. Framing decisions: Hypothetical and real. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 89 (2002) 1162-1175
20. Levin I., Gaeth G., Schreiber J., and Lauriola M. A new look at framing effects: Distribution of effect sizes, individual differences, and independence of types of effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 88 (2002) 411-429
21. McElroy T., and Seta J. Framing effects: An analytic-holistic perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 39 (2003) 610-617
22. McElroy T., Seta J., and Waring D. Reflections of the self: How self-esteem determines decision framing and increases risk taking. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 20 (2007) 223-240
23. Peters E., Västfjäll D., Slovic P., Mertz C., Mazzocco K., and Dickert S. Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science 17 (2006) 407-413
24. Piaget J. Judgment and reasoning in the child (1928), Routledge, London
25. Redmond M.V. A multidimensional theory and measure of social decentering. Journal of Research in Personality 29 (1995) 35-58
26. Seo M., and Barrett L. Being emotional during decision making - Good or bad?. Academy of Management Journal 50 (2007) 923-940
27. Shavelson R. Statistical reasoning for the behavioral sciences. 3rd ed. (1996), Allyn and Bacon, Boston
28. Tversky A., and Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211 (1981) 453-458
29. Underwood B., and Moore B. Perspective-taking and altruism. Psychological Bulletin 91 (1982) 143-173
30. Wang X.T. Framing effects: Dynamics and task domains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 68 (1996) 145-157
31. Wang X.T., Simons F., and Bredart S. Social cues and verbal framing in risky choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 14 (2001) 1-15