Social cues and verbal framing in risky choice

Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 1-15

  Wang, X T ^a,c   Simons, Frédéric ^b   Brédart, Serge ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^c W O Farber Center for Civic Leadership   (United States)

Author keywords

Aspiration level; Balanced framing; Decision cues; Framing effect; Group homogeneity; Kinship; Minimum requirement; Risky choice; Social context

Indexed keywords

EID: 23044524567     PISSN: 08943257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1099-0771(200101)14:1<1::AID-BDM361>3.0.CO;2-N     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Brewer MB, Miller N. 1996. Intergroup Relations. Brooks/Cole: Pacific Grove, CA.
2. Brunswik E. 1940. Thing constancy as measured by correlation coefficients. Psychological Review 47: 69-78.
3. Burnstein E, Crandall C, Kitayama S. 1994. Some neo-Darwinian decision rules for altruism: Weighing cues for inclusive fitness as a function of the biological importance of the decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67: 773-789.
4. Fagley NS, Miller PM. 1987. The effects of decision framing on choice of risky vs certain options. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 39: 264-277.
5. Fagley NS, Miller PM. 1997. Framing effects and arenas of choice: Your money or your life? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 71: 355-373.
6. Frisch D. 1993. Reasons for framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 54: 399-429.
7. Highhouse S, Paese P. 1996. Problem domain and prospect frame: choice under opportunity versus threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22: 124-132.
8. Jou J, Shanteau J, Harris RJ. 1996. An information processing view of framing effects: The role of causal schemas in decision making. Memory and Cognition 24: 1-15.
9. Kahneman D, Tversky A. 1979. Prospect theory. Econoimtrica 47: 263-292.
10. Kühberger A. 1998. The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 75: 23-55.
11. Levin IP, Johnson RD, Russo CP, Deldin PJ. 1985. Framing effects in judgment tasks with varying amounts of information. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 36: 362-377.
12. Levin IP, Schneider S, Gaeth GJ. 1998. All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 76: 149-188.
13. Lopes LL. 1987. Between hope and fear: The psychology of risk. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 20: 255-295.
14. Miller PM, Fagley NS. 1991. The effects of framing, problem variations, and providing rationale on choice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17: 517-522.
15. Petrinovich L, O'Neill P. 1996. The influence of wording and framing of questions on moral intuitions. Ethology and Sociobiology 17: 145-171.
16. Petrinovich L, O'Neill P, Jorgensen M. 1993. An empirical study of moral intuitions: toward an evolutionary ethics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64: 467-478.
17. Roszkowski MJ, Snelbecker GE. 1990. Effects of 'framing' on measures of risk tolerance: Financial planners are not immune. Journal of Behavioral Economics 19: 237-246.
18. Schneider SL. 1992. Framing and conflict: Aspiration level contingency, the status quo, and current theories of risky choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18: 1040-1057.
19. Shoorman FD, Mayer RC, Douglas CA, Hetrick CT. 1994. Escalation of commitment and the framing effect: An empirical investigation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 24: 509-528.
20. Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211: 453-458.
21. Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1992. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5: 297-323.
22. Wang X-T. 1996a. Domain-specific rationality in human choices: Violations of utility axioms and social contexts. Cognition 60: 31-63.
23. Wang X-T. 1996b. Framing effects: Dynamics and task domains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 68: 145-157.
24. Wang X-T, Johnston VS. 1995. Perceived social context and risk preference: A re-examination of framing effects in a life-death decision problem. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 8: 279-293.
25. Zickar MJ, Highhouse S. 1998. Looking closer at the effects of framing on risky choice: An item response theory analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 75: 75-91.