Framing effects: Dynamics and task domains

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 145-157

  Wang, X T ^a  

^a W O Farber Center for Civic Leadership   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030295935     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1996.0095     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bazerman, M. H., Magliozzi, T., & Neale, M. A. (1985). Integrative bargaining in a competitive market. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 294-313.
2. Bettman, J. R., & Sujan, M. (1987). Effects of framing on evaluation of comparable and noncomparable alternatives by expert and novice consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 141-154.
3. Bohm, P., & Lind, H. (1992). A note on the robustness of a classical framing result. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13, 355-361.
4. Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 163-228). New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
5. Fagley, N. S. (1993). A note concerning reflection effects versus framing effects. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 451-452.
6. Fagley, N. S., & Miller, P. M. (1987). The effects of decision framing on choice of risky vs certain options. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 264-277.
7. Fischhoff, B. (1983). Predicting frames. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 103-116.
8. Frisch, D. (1993). Reasons for framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 399-429.
9. Gigerenzer, G. (1996). Rationality: Why social context matters. In P. B. Baltes & U. Staudinger (Eds.), Interactive minds: Life-span perspectives on the social foundation of cognition (pp. 319-346). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
10. Gigerenzer, G., & Hug, K. (1992). Domain-specific reasoning: Social contracts, cheating, and perspective change. Cognition, 43, 127-171.
11. Hoch, S. J., & Ha, Y.-W. (1986). Consumer learning: Advertising and the ambiguity of product experience. The Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 221-233.
12. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory. Econometrica, 47, 263-292.
13. Kramer, R. M. (1989). Windows of vulnerability or cognitive illusions? Cognitive processes and the nuclear arms race. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 79-100.
14. Levin, I. P., Johnson, R. D., Russo, C. P., & Deldin, P. J. (1985). Framing effects in judgment tasks with varying amounts of information. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 362-377.
15. Lopes, L. L., & Oden, G. C. (1991). The rationality of intelligence. In E. Eells & T. Maruszewski (Eds.), Rationality and reasoning: Essays in honor of L. J. Cohen. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
16. McNeil, B. J., Pauker, S. G., Sox, H. C., Jr., & Tversky, A. (1982). On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. New England Journal of Medicine, 306, 1259-1262.
17. Meyerowitz, B. E., & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 500-510.
18. Miller, P. M., & Fagley, N. S. (1991). The effects of framing, problem variations, and providing rationale on choice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 517-522.
19. Neale, M. A., Huber, V. L., & Northcraft, G. B. (1987). The framing of negotiations: Contextual versus task frames. Organizational Behavioral Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 228-241.
20. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1992). Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 87-131.
21. Qualls, W. J., & Puto, C. P. (1989). Organizational climate and decision framing: An integrated approach to analyzing industrial buying decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 179-192.
22. Real, L. (1991). Animal choice behavior and the evolution of cognitive architecture. Science, 253, 980-986.
23. Real, L., & Caraco, T. (1986). Risk and foraging in stochastic environments. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 17, 371-390.
24. Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1991). Fuzzy-trace theory and framing effects in choice: Gist extraction, truncation, and conversion. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 4, 249-262.
25. Roszkowski, M. J., & Snelbecker, G. E. (1990). Effects of "framing" on measures of risk tolerance: Financial planners are not immune. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19, 237-246.
26. Schneider, S. L. (1992). Framing and conflict: Aspiration level contingency, the status quo, and current theories of risky choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1040-1057.
27. Schneider, S. L., Levin, I. P., & Gaeth, G. J. (1995, November). The three faces of framing: Risk preference, evaluation, and persuasion. Paper presented at the 36th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles, CA.
28. Schneider, S. L., & Lopes, L. L. (1986). Reflection in preferences under risk: Who and when may suggest why. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 535-548.
29. Shoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., Douglas, C. A., & Hetrick, C. T. (1994). Escalation of commitment and the framing effect: An empirical investigation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 509-528.
30. Travis, C. B., Phillippi, R. H., & Tonn, B. E. (1989). Judgment heuristics and medical decisions. Patient Education and Counseling, 13, 211-220.
31. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
32. Wagenaar, W. A., Keren, G., & Lichtenstein, S. (1988). Islanders and hostages: Deep and surface structures of decision problems. Acta Psychologica, 67, 175-189.
33. Wahlund, R. (1989). Att fatta beslut under osäkerhet och risk. Stockholm: Norstedts Förlag.
34. Wang, X. T. (1996a). Domain-specific rationality in human choices: Violations of utility axioms and social contexts. Cognition, 60, 31-63.
35. Wang, X. T. (1996b). Evolutionary hypotheses of risk-sensitive choice: Age differences and perspective change. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 1-15.
36. Wang, X. T., & Johnston, V. S. (1995). Perceived social context and risk preference: A reexamination of framing effects in a life - death decision problem. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 8, 279-293.