Assessment of runoff and sediment yield in the miyun reservoir catchment by using SWAT model

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 23, Issue 25, 2009, Pages 3619-3630

  Xu, Z X ^a   Pang, J P ^a,b   Liu, C M ^a   Li, J Y ^c  

^a BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b YANGTZE RIVER SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (China)

^c Ministry of Natural Resources of the People's Republic of China   (China)

Author keywords

Hydrograph; Miyun reservoir; Sediment; Soil erosio; SWAT

Indexed keywords

A-COEFFICIENT; AVAILABLE WATER CAPACITIES; BASEFLOWS; CATCHMENT SCALE; COEFFICIENT OF DETERMINATION; COMPENSATION FACTOR; CURVE NUMBERS; HYDROGRAPHS; LAG-TIME; LINEAR PARAMETERS; MIYUN RESERVOIR; NASH-SUTCLIFFE COEFFICIENT; NORTH CHINA; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT PROCESS; SEDIMENT YIELDS; SEMIARID AREA; SENSITIVE PARAMETER; SOIL AND WATER ASSESSMENT TOOL; SOIL EROSION; SOIL PROFILES; SURFACE FLOW; SWAT MODEL; WATER QUANTITIES;

ARID REGIONS; CALIBRATION; CATCHMENTS; EROSION; FLOW SIMULATION; GEOLOGIC MODELS; GROUNDWATER FLOW; RESERVOIRS (WATER); RUNOFF; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; SEDIMENTATION; SEDIMENTOLOGY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIMULATORS; SOILS; WATER ANALYSIS;

HYDRAULIC MODELS;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; AVAILABLE WATER CAPACITY; CALIBRATION; CATCHMENT; HYDROGRAPH; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; MODEL VALIDATION; RUNOFF; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; SEDIMENT YIELD; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOIL EROSION; SOIL PROFILE; STREAMFLOW;

ASIA; BEIJING [CHINA]; CHINA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; MIYUN RESERVOIR;

EID: 71649099458     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7475     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abbaspour KC, Yang J, Maximov I, Siber R, Bogner K, Mieleitner J, Zobrist J, Srinivasan R. 2007. Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT. Journal of Hydrology 333: 413-430.
2. Arnold JG, Allen PM. 1996. Estimating hydrologic budgets for three Illinois watersheds. Journal of Hydrology 176: 57-77.
3. Arnold JG, Fohrer N. 2005. SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modeling. Hydrological Processes 19: 563-572.
4. Arnold JG, Srinivasan P, Muttiah RS, Williams JR. 1998. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment. Part I. Model development. Journal of American Water Resources Association 34: 73-89.
5. Arnold JG, Williams JR, Nicks AD. 1990. SWRRB: A Basin Scale Simulation Model for Soil and Water Resources Management. Texas A&M Press: College Station.
6. Benaman J, Shoemaker CA. 2005. An analysis of high-flow sediment event data for evaluating model performance. Hydrological Processes 19: 605-620.
7. Bouraoui F, Dillaha TA. 2001. ANSWERS-2000: runoff and sediment transport model. Journal of Environmental Engineering 122(6): 493-501.
8. Canfield HE, Goodrich DC. 2006. The impact of parameter lumping and geometric simplification in modeling runoff and erosion in the shrublands of southeast Arizona. Hydrological Processes 20: 17-35.
9. Cao WZ, Bowden WB, Davie T, Fenemor A. 2006. Multi-variable and multi-site calibration and validation of SWAT in a large mountainous catchment with high spatial variability. Hydrological Processes 20: 1057-1073.
10. Donigian AS, Bicknell BR, Imhoff JC. 1995. Hydrological simulation program-Fortran (HSPF), chap. 12. In Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, Singh VP (ed). Water Resources Publications: Colorado, USA; 395-442.
11. Du GS, Meng FY, Li XD. 1999. Present water quality and the future in the Miyun Reservoir. Journal of Environmental Science 2: 110-112. (in Chinese).
12. Easton ZM, Fuka DR, Walter MT, Cowan DM, Schneiderman EM, Steenhuis TS. 2008. Re-conceptualizing the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) model to predict runoff from variable source areas. Journal of Hydrology 348: 279-291.
13. Gassman PW, Reyes M, Green CH, Arnold JG. 2007. The soil and water assessment tool: historical development, applications, and future directions. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biochemical Engineering 50(4): 1211-1250.
14. Geza M, McCray JE. 2008. Effects of soil data resolution on SWAT model stream flow and water quality predictions. Journal of Environmental Management 88: 393-406.
15. Gosain AK, Rao S, Srinivasan R, Reddy NG. 2005. Return-flow assessment for irrigation command in the Palleru river basin using SWAT model. Hydrological Processes 19: 673-682.
16. Govender M, Everson CS. 2005. Modelling streamflow from two small South African experimental catchements using the SWAT model. Hydrological Processes 19: 683-692.
17. Immerzeel WW, Droogers P. 2008. Calibration of a distributed hydrological model based on satellite evapotranspiration. Journal of Hydrology 349: 411-424.
18. Kou XJ, Ge JP, Wang Y, Zhang CJ. 2007. Validation of the weather generator CLIGEN with daily precipitation data from the Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Hydrology 347: 347-357.
19. Krause P, Boyle DP, Base F. 2005. Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Advances in Geosciences 5: 89-97.
20. Lenhart T, Rompaey AV, Steegen A, Fohrer N, Frede HG, Govers G. 2005. Considering spatial distribution and deposition of sedimentin lumped and semi-distributed models. Hydrological Processes 19: 785-792.
21. Lin ZL, Radcliffe DE. 2006. Automatic calibration and predictive uncertainty analysis of a semidistributed watershed model. Vadose Zone Journal 5(1): 248-260.
22. Mapfumo E, Chanasyk DS, Willms WD. 2004. Simulating daily soil water under foothill fescue grazing with the soil and water assessment tool model (Alberta, Canada). Hydrological Processes 18: 2787-2800.
23. Ministry of Water Resources, People's Republic of China. 1997. Standards for Classification and Gradation of Soil Erosion (SL190-96) (in Chinese). China Water Resources Press: Beijing, China; 14.
24. Mishra A, Kar S, Singh VP. 2007. Determination of runoff and sediment yield from a small watershed in sub-humid subtropics using the HSPF model. Hydrological Processes 21: 3035-3045.
25. Muttiah RS, Wurbs RA. 2002. Scale-dependent soil and climate variability effects on watershed water balance of the SWAT model. Journal of Hydrology 256: 264-285.
26. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV. 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Journal of Hydrology 10(3): 282-290.
27. Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, William JR. 2005. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation (Version 2005). Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, and Blackland Research Center, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station: Temple, Texas 76502, USA, 494.
28. Refsgaard JC, Storm B. 1995. MIKE SHE, chapter 22. In Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, Singh VP (ed). Water Resources Publications: Colorado, USA; 809-846.
29. Sloto RA, Crouse MY. 1996. HYSEP: A Computer Program for Streamflow Hydrograph Separation and Analysis. Lemoyne: U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Investigations Report 96-4040.
30. Sudheer KP, Chaubey I, Garg V, Migliaccio KW. 2007. Impact of timescale of the calibration objective function on the performance of watershed models. Hydrological Processes 21: 3409-3419.
31. Tolson BA, Shoemaker CA. 2007. Cannonsville reservoir watershed SWAT2000 model development, calibration and validation. Journal of Hydrology 337: 68-86.
32. Tripathi MP, Panda RK, Raghuwanshi NS. 2005. Development of effective management plan for critical subwatersheds using SWAT model. Hydrological Processes 19: 809-826.
33. Tripathi MP, Panda RK, Raghuwanshi NS, Singh R. 2004. Hydrological modeling of a small watershed using generated rainfall in the soil and water assessment tool model. Hydrological Processes 18: 1811-1821.
34. Tripathi MP, Raghuwanshi NS, Rao GP. 2006. Effect of watershed subdivision on simulation of water balance components. Hydrological Processes 20: 1137-1156.
35. Wang XY, Wang XF, Wang QP. 2004. Estimation of nonpoint source pollution load in the Miyun Reservoir catchment. Journal of Geographical Sciences 24(2): 227-231. (in Chinese).
36. Wu KS, Johnston CA. 2007. Hydrologic response to climatic variability in a Great Lakes watershed: a case study with the SWAT model. Journal of Hydrology 337: 187-199.
37. Wu YD, Xu ZX, Che ZS, Pang JP. 2009. Impact of land uses/cover on streamflow in the Chao River basin. Resources Science (in Chinese) (in press).
38. Xu YG, Liu HL, Shen ZY. 2006. Simulation of nonpoint source pollution in the Maoping River basin. Journal of Environmental Science 27(11): 2176-2181. (in Chinese).
39. Yang J, Reichert P, Abbaspour KC, Yang H. 2007. Hydrological modelling of the Chaohe basin in China: statistical model formulation and Bayesian inference. Journal o Hydrology 340: 167-182.
40. Young RA, Onstad CA, Bosch DD. 1989. AGNPS: a nonpoint-source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 44(2): 168-173.
41. Zhang SC, Liu MH. 2006. Simulation and analysis of areal source pollution in the Zhugan River basin. Journal of Hydropower 25(5): 51-57. (in Chinese).