Automatic calibration and predictive uncertainty analysis of a semidistributed watershed model

Vadose Zone Journal

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 248-260

  Lin, Zhulu ^a   Radcliffe, David E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; MODEL VALIDATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARAMETERIZATION; PREDICTION; SOFTWARE; SPATIAL VARIATION; STREAMFLOW; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WATERSHED;

CANTON [GEORGIA]; ETOWAH RIVER; GEORGIA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34547891813     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15391663     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2005.0025     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Arnold, J.G., S. Srinivasan, R.S. Muttiah, and J.R. Williams. 1998. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment. Part I. Model development. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 34(1):73-89 (JAWRA).
2. Bastidas, L.A., H.V. Gupta, and S. Sorooshian. 2001. Bounding the parameters of land-surface schemes using observational data. p. 65-76. In V. Lakshmi et al. (ed.) Land surface hydrology, meteorology, and climate: Observations and modeling. AGU, Washington, DC.
3. Beck, M.B. 1987. Water quality modeling: A review of the analysis of uncertainty. Water Resour. Res. 23:1393-1442.
4. Beven, K. 1989. Changing ideas in hydrology - The case of physically-based models. J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam) 105:157-172.
5. Beven, K. 1993. Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modeling. Adv. Water Resour. 16:14-51.
6. Boyle, D.P., H.V. Gupta, and S. Sorooshian. 2000. Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods. Water Resour. Res. 36:3663-3674.
7. Burkhead, N.M., S.J. Walsh, B.J. Freeman, and J.D. Williams. 1997. Status and restoration of the Etowah River, and imperiled southern Appalachian ecosystem. In G.W. Benz and D.E. Collins (ed.) Aquatic fauna in peril: The Southeastern perspective. Southeast Aquatic Research Institute, Decatur, GA.
8. Doherty, J. 2003a. Ground water model calibration using pilot points and regularization. Ground Water 41:170-177.
9. Doherty, J., 2003b. PEST surface water utilities user's manual. Watermark Numerical Computing, Brisbane, Australia and University of Idaho, Idaho Falls.
10. Doherty, J. 2004. PEST - Model-independent parameter estimation user's manual. 5th ed. Watermark Numerical Computing, Brisbane, Australia.
11. Doherty, J., and J.M. Johnston. 2003. Methodologies for calibration and predictive analysis of a watershed model. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 29(2):251-265.
12. Duan, Q.Y., V.K. Gupta, and S. Sorooshian. 1993. Shuffled complex evolution approach for effective and efficient global minimization. J. Optimiz. Theory Appl. 76:501-521.
13. Duan, Q.Y., S. Sorooshian, and V. Gupta. 1992. Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall runoff models. Water Resour. Res. 28:1015-1031.
14. Duan, Q.Y., S. Sorooshian, and V.K. Gupta. 1994. Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models. J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam) 158:265-284.
15. Eckhardt, E., and J.G. Arnold. 2001. Automatic calibration of a distributed catchment model (Technical note). J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam) 251:103-109.
16. Gupta, H.V., L.A. Bastidas, S. Sorooshian, W.J. Shuttleworth, and Z.L. Yang. 1999. Parameter estimation of a land surface scheme using multicriteria methods. J. Geophys. Res. 104(D16):19491-19503.
17. Gupta, H.V., S. Sorooshian, T.S. Hogue, and D.P. Boyle. 2003. Advances in automatic calibration of watershed models. p. 9-28. In Q.Y. Duan et al. (ed.) Calibration of watershed models. AGU, Washington, DC.
18. Gupta, H.V., S. Sorooshian, and P.O. Yapo. 1998. Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and noncommensurable measures of information. Water Resour. Res. 34:751-763.
19. Hargreaves, G.L., G.H. Hargreaves, and J.P. Riley. 1985. Agricultural benefits for Senegal River Basin. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 111:113-124.
20. Hensen, P.C. 2001. Regularization tools: A Matlab package for analysis and solution of discrete ill-posed problems. Department of Mathematical Modelling, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby.
21. Hogue, T.S., L. Bastidas, H. Gupta, S. Sorooshian, K. Mitchell, and W. Emmerich. 2005. Evaluation and transferability of the Noah Land Surface Model in semiarid environments. J. Hydrometeorol. 6:68-84.
22. Hogue, T.S., S. Sorooshian, H. Gupta, A. Holz, and D. Braatz. 2000. A multistep automatic calibration scheme for river forecasting models. J. Hydrometeorol. 1:524-542.
23. Jakeman, A.J., and G.M. Hornberger. 1993. How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall-runoff model? Water Resour. Res. 29:2637-2649.
24. Legates, D.R., and G.J. McCabe, Jr. 1999. Evaluating the use of "goodness-of-fit" measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resour. Res. 35:233-241.
25. Madsen, H. 2000. Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model using multiple objectives. J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam) 235:276-288.
26. Neitsch, S.L., J.G. Arnold, J.R. Kiniry, R. Srinivasan, and J.R. Williams. 2002. Soil and water assessment tool user's manual. Version 2000. Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station.
27. Omlin, M., and P. Reichert. 1999. A comparison of techniques for the estimation of model prediction uncertainty. Ecol. Modell. 115:45-59.
28. Qian, S.S., C.A. Stow, and M.E. Borsuk. 2003. On Monte Carlo methods for Bayesian inference. Ecol. Modell. 159:269-277.
29. Sorooshian, S., and V.K. Gupta. 1995. Model calibration. In Vijay P. Singh (ed.) Computer models of watershed hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, CO.
30. Sorooshian, S., V.K. Gupta, and J.L. Fulton. 1983. Evaluation of maximum likelihood parameter estimation techniques for conceptual rainfall-runoff models: Influence of calibration data, variability and length on model credibility. Water Resour. Res. 19:251-259.
31. USDA-NRCS. 2003. National soil survey handbook. Title 430-VI [Online]. Available at http://soils.usda.gov/technical/handbook/ (verified 5 Dec. 2005).
32. van Griensven, A., and W. Bauwens. 2003. Multiobjective autoclibration for semidistributed water quality models. Water Resour. Res. 39(12):1348. doi:10.1029/2003WR002284.
33. Vecchia, A.V., and R.L. Cooley. 1987. Simultaneous confidence and prediction intervals for nonlinear regression models with application to a groundwater flow model. Water Resour. Res. 23:1237-1250.
34. Vrugt, J.A., W. Bouten, H.V. Gupta, and J.W. Hopmans. 2003a. Toward improved identifiability of soil hydraulic parameters: On the selection of a suitable parametric model. Available at www.vadosezonejournal.org. Vadose Zone J. 2:98-113.
35. Vrugt, J.A., H.V. Gupta, L.A. Bastidas, W. Bouten, and S. Sorooshian. 2003b. Effective and efficient algorithm for multiobjective optimization of hydrologic models. Water Resour. Res. 39(8):1214. doi:10.1029/2002WR001746.
36. Vrugt, J.A., H.V. Gupta, W. Bouten, and S. Sorooshian. 2003c. A Shuffled Complex Evolution Metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters. Water Resour. Res. 39(8):1201. doi:10.1029/2002WR001642.
37. Vrugt, J.A., G. Schoups, J.W. Hopmans, C. Young, W.W. Wallender, T. Harter, and W. Bouten. 2004. Inverse modeling of large-scale spatially distributed vadose zone properties using global optimization. Water Resour. Res. 40:W06503. doi:10.1029/2003WR002706.
38. Wang, J., Z. Lu, and H. Habu. 2001. The SCE-UA to solution of constrained nonlinear problem. J. Hohai Univ. 29(3):46-50 (Natural Sciences).
39. Yapo, P.O., H.V. Gupta, and S. Sorooshian. 1996. Calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: Sensitivity to calibration data. J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam) 181:23-48.
40. Yapo, P.O., H.V. Gupta, and S. Sorooshian. 1998. Multi-objective global optimization for hydrologic models. J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam) 204:83-97.