Cannonsville Reservoir Watershed SWAT2000 model development, calibration and validation

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 337, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 68-86

  Tolson, Bryan A ^a   Shoemaker, Christine A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b Cornell University   (United States)

Author keywords

Calibration; Distributed watershed model; Hydrologic modelling; Nonpoint source pollution; Phosphorus; Validation

Indexed keywords

CLIMATOLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PHOSPHORUS; SNOW; WATER ABSORPTION; WATERSHEDS;

DISTRIBUTED WATERSHED MODEL; HYDROLOGIC MODELING; NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION;

FLOW OF WATER;

CLIMATOLOGY; FLOW OF WATER; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PHOSPHORUS; SNOW; WATER ABSORPTION; WATERSHEDS;

CALIBRATION; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; MODEL VALIDATION; NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION; PHOSPHORUS; POLLUTANT TRANSPORT; RESERVOIR; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; SOIL WATER; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHED;

CANNONSVILLE RESERVOIR; DELAWARE COUNTY [NEW YORK]; NEW YORK [UNITED STATES]; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33947576866     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.01.017     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Arnold J., and Allen P.M. Automated methods for estimating baseflow and groundwater recharge from streamflow records. Journal of American Water Resources Association 35 2 (1999) 411-424
2. Arnold J.G., and Fohrer N. SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling. Hydrological Processes 19 (2005) 563-572
3. Arnold J.G., Srinivasan R., Muttiah R.R., and Williams J.R. Large area hydrologic modelling and assessment. Part I: Model development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34 1 (1998) 73-89
4. Benaman, J., 2002. A systematic approach to uncertainty analysis for a distributed watershed model. Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
5. Benaman J., and Shoemaker C.A. Methodology for analyzing ranges of uncertain model parameters and their impact on the Total Maximum Daily Load process. ASCE Journal of Environmental Engineering 130 6 (2004) 648-656
6. Benaman J., and Shoemaker C.A. An analysis of high-flow sediment event data for evaluating model performance. Hydrologic Processes 19 (2005) 605-620
7. Benaman J., Shoemaker C.A., and Haith D.L. Calibration and validation of soil and Water Assessment Tool on an agricultural watershed in Upstate New York. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 10 5 (2005) 363-374
8. Bicknell, B.R., Imoff, J.C., Kittle, J.L., Jobes, T.H., Donigan, A.S., 2001. Hydrological Simulation Program - FORTRAN. Version 12. User's Manual, AQUA TERRA Consultants. United States Environmental Protection Agency.
9. Bingner R.L. Runoff simulated from Goodwin Creek Watershed using SWAT. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 39 1 (1996) 85-90
10. Bingner R.L., Garbrecht J., Arnold J.G., and Srinivasan R. Effect of watershed subdivision on simulation runoff and fine sediment yield. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 40 5 (1997) 1329-1335
11. Chen E., and Mackay D.S. Effects of distribution-based parameter aggregation on a spatially distributed agricultural nonpoint source pollution model. Journal of Hydrology 295 (2004) 211-224
12. DiLuzio, M., Srinivasan, R. and Arnold, J.G., 2001. Arcview interface for SWAT2000 User's Guide, US Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service, Temple, TX.
13. Eckhardt K., and Arnold J.G. Automatic calibration of a distributed catchment model. Journal of Hydrology 251 (2001) 103-109
14. Eckhardt K., Haverkamp S., Fohrer N., and Frede H.G. SWAT-G, a version of SWAT99.2 modified for application to low mountain range catchments. Physics and Chemistry of The Earth 27 9-10 (2002) 641-644
15. FitzHugh T.W., and Mackay D.S. Impacts of input parameter spatial aggregation on an agricultural nonpoint source pollution model. Journal of Hydrology 236 (2000) 35-53
16. Fontaine T.A., and Jacomino V.M.F. Sensitivity analysis of simulated contaminated sediment transport. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 33 2 (1997) 313-326
17. Grizzetti B., Bouraoui F., Granlund K., Rekolainen S., and Bidoglio G. Modelling diffuse emission and retention of nutrients in the Vantaanjoki watershed (Finland) using the SWAT model. Ecological Modelling 169 (2003) 25-38
18. Haith, D.A., Mandel, R., Wu, R.S., 1992. Generalized Watershed Loading Functions: Version 2.0 User's Manual, Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering Cornell University.
19. Johnson C.W., Gordon N.D., and Hanson C.L. Northwest rangeland sediment yield analysis by the MUSLE. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 28 6 (1985) 1889-1895
20. Kane, K., 1999. Proposed Phase II phosphorus TMDL calculations for Cannonsville Reservoir, New York City Department of Environmental Protection.
21. Kirsch K., Kirsch A., and Arnold J.G. Predicting sediment and phosphorus loads in the Rock River basin using SWAT. Transactions of the ASAE 45 6 (2002) 1757-1769
22. Longabucco P., and Rafferty M.R. Analysis of material loading to Cannonsville Reservoir: advantages of event-based sampling. Journal of Lakes and Reservoir Management 14 2-3 (1998) 197-212
23. Lumia, R., 1998. Flood of January 19-20, 1996 in New York State. Water-Resources Investigations Report 97-4252, US Geological Society, Albany, NY.
24. Manguerra H.B., and Engel B.A. Hydrologic parameterization of watersheds for runoff prediction using SWAT. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34 5 (1998) 1149-1162
25. McConkey B.G., Nicholaichuk W., Steppuhn H., and Reimer C.D. Sediment yield and seasonal soil erodibility for semiarid cropland in western Canada. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 77 (1997) 33-40
26. Muleta M.K., and Nicklow J.W. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis coupled with automatic calibration for a distributed watershed model. Journal of Hydrology 306 (2005) 127-145
27. Nash J.E., and Suttcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models, Part I. A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10 3 (1970) 282-290
28. Neitsch, S.L., Arnold, J.G., Kiniry, J.R., Williams, J.R., 2001a. Soil and Water Assessment Tool theoretical documentation version 2000: Draft-April 2001, US Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service, Temple, Texas.
29. Neitsch, S.L., Arnold, J.G., Kiniry, J.R., Williams, J.R., 2001b. Soil and Water Assessment Tool user's manual version 2000: Draft-April 2001, US Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service, Temple, Texas.
30. Peterson J.R., and Hamlett J.M. Hydrologic calibration of the SWAT model in a watershed containing fragipan soils. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34 3 (1998) 531-544
31. Santhi C., Arnold J.G., Williams J.R., Dugas W.A., Srinivasan R., and Hauck L.M. Validation of the SWAT Model on a large river basin with point and nonpoint sources. Journal of American Water Resources Association 37 5 (2001) 1169-1188
32. Schneiderman E.M., Pierson D.C., Lounsbury D.G., and Zion M.S. Modelling the hydrochemistry of the Cannonsville Watershed with Generalized Watershed Loading Functions (GWLF). Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38 5 (2002) 1323-1347
33. Tolson, B.A. and Shoemaker, C.A., 2006. Watershed modelling of the Cannonsville Basin using SWAT2000: model development, calibration and validation for the prediction of flow, sediment and phosphorus transport to the Cannonsville Reservoir - Version 2.0. Cornell University, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Technical Report, Ithaca, NY.