Simulating daily soil water under foothills fescue grazing with the soil and water assessment tool model (Alberta, Canada)

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 18, Issue 15, 2004, Pages 2787-2800

  Mapfumo, Emmanuel ^a   Chanasyk, David S ^a   Willms, Walter D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b LETHBRIDGE RESEARCH CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Hydrology; Model sensitivity; Soil moisture; Statistical evaluation; SWAT

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL METHODS; STREAM FLOW; WATERSHEDS;

HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS; SOIL AND WATER ASSESSMENT TOOLS (SWAT); SOIL-WATER PATTERNS;

SOILS;

GRAZING; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; RUNOFF; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOIL MOISTURE; SOIL WATER;

ALBERTA; CANADA; NORTH AMERICA; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 7244219937     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.1493     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Antonopoulos VZ, Wyseure GCL. 1998. Modeling of water and nitrogen dynamics on an undisturbed soil and a restored soil after open-cast mining. Agricultural Water Management 37 (1): 21-40.
2. Arnold JG, Allen PM. 1996. Estimating hydrologic budgets for three Illinois watersheds. Journal of Hydrology 176: 57-77.
3. Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR. 1998. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment. Part I: model development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34 (1): 73-101.
4. Bremer DJ, Auen LM, Ham JM, Owensby CE. 2001. Evapotranspiration in a prairie ecosystem: effects of grazing by cattle. Agronomy Journal 93: 338.
5. Chanasyk DS, Mapfumo E, Willms WD. 2003. Quantification and simulation of surface runoff from fescue grassland watersheds. Agricultural Water Management 59 (2): 137-153.
6. Di Luzio M, Srinivasan R, Arnold JG. 2002. Integration of watershed tools and SWAT model into BASINS. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38 (4): 1127-1141.
7. Elmaloglou St., Malamos N. 2000. Simulation of soil moisture content of a prairie field with SWAP93. Agricultural Water Management 43 139-149.
8. Huggins LF, Burney JR. 1982. Surface runoff, storage and routing. In Hydrologic Modeling of Small Watersheds, Haan CT, Johnson HP, Brakensiek DL (eds). American Society of Agricultural Engineers: St Joseph: MI; 169-225.
9. James LD, Burges SJ, 1982. Selection, calibration, and testing of hydrologic models. In Hydrologic Modeling of Small Watersheds, Haan CT, Johnson HP, Brakensiek DL (eds). American Society of Agricultural Engineers: St Joseph: MI; 437-472.
10. Koivusalo H, Kokkonen T. 2003. Modelling runoff generation in a forested catchment in southern Finland. Hydrological Processes 17: 313-328.
11. Loague K, Green RE. 1991. Statistical and graphical methods for evaluating solute transport models: overview and application. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 7: 51-73.
12. Manguerra HB, Engel BA. 1998. Hydrologic parameterization of watersheds for runoff prediction using SWAT. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34 (5): 1149-1162.
13. Naeth MA, Rothwell RL, Chanasyk DS, Bailey AW. 1990. Grazing impacts on infiltration in mixed prairie and fescue grassland ecosystems of Alberta. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 70: 593-605.
14. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV. 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models, part 1-a discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10: 282-290.
15. Nearing MA, Deer-Ascough LA, Laflen JM. 1990. Sensitivity analysis of the WEPP hillslope profile erosion model. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 33 (3): 839-849.
16. Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR, King KW. 2002. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation Version 2000. GSWRL Report 02-01, BRC Report 02-05, Published by Texas Water Resources Institute TR-191: College Station, TX; 498 pp.
17. Peterson JR, Hamlett JM. 1998. Hydrologic calibration of the SWAT model in a watershed containing fragipan soils. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34 (3): 531-544.
18. Priestley CHB, Taylor RJ. 1972. On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Monthly Weather Review 100: 81-92.
19. Refsgaard JC. 1997. Parameterisation, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models. Journal of Hydrology 198: 69-97.
20. Santhi C, Arnold JG, Williams JR, Dugas WA, Srinivasan R, Hauck LM. 2001. Validation of the SWAT model on a large river basin with point and nonpoint sources. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37 (5): 1169-1188.
21. Sharma ML. 1985. Estimating evapotranspiration. Advances in Irrigation 3: 213-281.
22. Shirmohammadi A, Chu TW, Montas H, Sohrabi T. 2001. SWAT model and its applicability to watershed nonpoint source pollution assessment. American Society of Agricultural Engineers Meeting Presentation, 30 July-1 August, Sacramento Convention Center, Sacramento, CA, USA; Paper 01-2005, 26 p.
23. Spruill CA, Workman SR, Taraba JL. 2000. Simulation of daily and monthly stream discharge from small watersheds using the SWAT model. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 43 (6): 1431-1439.
24. Srinivasan R, Arnold JG. 1994. Integration of a basin-scale water quality model with GIS. Water Resources Bulletin 30 (3): 453-462.
25. Srinivasan R, Ramanarayanan TS, Arnold JG, Bednarz ST. 1998. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment. Part II: model application. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34 (1): 91-101.
26. USEPA. 2001. Better Assessment Science Integrating Point and Nonpoint Sources: Basins Version 3.0 User's manual. EPA-823-B01-001, National Service Center for Environmental Publications: Cincinnati, OH.
27. Walker SE, Mitchell JK, Hirschi MC, Johnsen KE. 2000. Sensitivity analysis of the root zone water quality model. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 43 (4): 841-846.
28. Wilby RL, Conway D, Jones PD. 2002. Prospects for downscaling seasonal precipitation variability using conditioned weather generator parameters. Hydrological Processes 16 (6): 1215-1234.