Phylogeny of Chamaecrista Moench (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae) based on nuclear and chloroplast DNA regions

Taxon

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 1168-1180

  de Souza Conceição, Adilva ^a,b   de Queiroz, Luciano Paganucci ^a   Lewis, Gwilym Peter ^c   de Andrade, Maria José Gomes ^a   de Almeida, Paulo Ricardo Machado ^a   Schnadelbach, Alessandra Selbach ^a   van den Berg, Cássio ^a  

^a DEPARTAMENTO DE CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSIDADE DO ESTADO DA BAHIA   (Brazil)

^c ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Caesalpinioideae; Chamaecrista; ITS; Phylogeny; trnL F

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPLAST; CHROMOSOME; CLADISTICS; DIVERGENCE; DNA; GENETIC MARKER; GRASSLAND; LEGUME; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; PLASTID; RAINFOREST;

CAESALPINIOIDEAE; CALICIOPSIS; CHAMAECRISTA; FABACEAE; MANNIA;

EID: 71049151982     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tax.584010     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Barton, A.M. 1986. Spatial variation in the effect of ants on extrafloral nectary plant. Ecology 67: 495-504.
2. Biondo, E., Miotto, S.T.S. & Schifino-Wittmann, M.T. 2005. Números cromossômicos e implicações sistemáticas em espécies da subfamília Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae) ocorrentes na região sul do Brasil. Revista Brasil. Bot. 28: 797-808.
3. Biondo, E., Miotto, S.T.S. & Schifino-Wittmann, M.T. 2006. Cytogenetics of species of Chamaecrista (LeguminosaeCaesalpinioideae) native to southern Brazil. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 150: 429-439.
4. Bruneau, A., Forest, F., Herendeen, P.S., Klitgaard, B.B. & Lewis, G.P. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships in the Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae) as inferred from chloroplast trnL-F intron sequences. Syst. Bot. 26: 487-514.
5. Bruneau, A., Mercure, M., Lewis, G.P. & Herendeen, P.S. 2008. Phylogenetic patterns and diversification in caesal-pinioid legumes. Botany 86: 697-718.
6. Buckley, R. 1983. Interactions between ants and membracid bugs decreases growth and seed set of host plant bearing extrafloral nectaries. Oecologia 58: 132-136.
7. Desfeaux, C., Maurice, S., Henry J.P., Lejeune, B. & Gouyon, P.H. 1996. Evolution of reproductive system in the genus Silene. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 263: 409-414.
8. Doyle, J.J., Chappill, J.A., Bailey, C.D. & Kajita, T. 2000. Towards a comprehensive phylogeny of legumes: evidence from rbcL sequence and non-molecular data. Pp. 1-20 in: Herendeen, P.S. & Bruneau, A. (eds.), Advances in Legume Systematics, part 9. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
9. Doyle, J.J. & Doyle, J.L. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation method for small quantities of fresh tissues. Phytochem. Bull. 19: 11-15.
10. Endress, P.K. & Stumpf, S. 1991. The diversity of stamen structures in 'Lower' Rosidae (Rosales, Fabales, Proteales, Sapindales). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 107: 217-293.
11. Fedorov, A.A. 1969. Chromosome Numbers of Flowering Plants. Academy of Sciences, Leningrad.
12. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
13. Fitch, W.M. 1971. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimal change for a specific tree topology. Syst. Zool. 20: 406-416.
14. Goldblatt, P. 1981. Cytology and the phylogeny of Leguminosae. Pp. 427-463 in: Polhill, R.M. & Raven, P.H. (eds.), Advances in Legume Systematics, part 2. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
15. Goldblatt, P. & Johnson, D.E. 1990. Index to Plant Chromosome Numbers 1986-87. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 30. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis.
16. Goldblatt, P. & Johnson, D.E. 1994. Index to Plant Chromosome Numbers 1990-91. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 51. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis.
17. Goldblatt, P. & Johnson, D.E. 2000. Index to Plant Chromosome Numbers 1996-97. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 81. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis.
18. Herendeen, P.S., Bruneau, A. & Lewis, G.P. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships in caesalpinioid legumes: a preliminary analysis based on morphological and molecular data. Pp. 37-62 in: Klitgaard, B.B. & Bruneau, A. (eds.), Advances in Legume Systematics, part 10, Higher Level Systematics. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
19. Irwin, H.S. 1964. Monographic studies in Cassia (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae) I section Xerocalyx. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 12: 1-114.
20. Irwin, H.S. & Barneby, R.C. 1977. Monographic studies in Cassia (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae) IV. Suplementary notes on section Apoucouita Bentham. Brittonia 29: 277-290.
21. Irwin, H.S. & Barneby, R.C. 1978. Monographic studies in Cassia (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae) III. Sections Absus and Grimaldia. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 30: 1-277.
22. Irwin, H.S. & Barneby, R.C. 1981. Cassieae. Pp. 97-106 in: Polhill, R.M. & Raven, P.H. (eds.), Advances in Legume Systematics, part 1. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
23. Irwin, H.S. & Barneby, R.C. 1982. The American Cassiinae, a synoptical revision of Leguminosae tribe Cassieae subtribe Cassiinae in the New World. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 35: 1-918.
24. Irwin, H.S. & Rogers, D.J. 1967. Monographic studies in Cassia (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae). II. A taximetric study of section Apoucouita. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 16: 71-120.
25. Irwin, H.S. & Turner, B.L. 1960. Chromosomal relationships and taxonomic considerations in the genus Cassia. Amer. J. Bot. 47: 309-318.
26. Kajita, T., Ohashi, H., Tateishi, Y., Bailey, C.D. & Doyle, J.J. 2001. rbcL and legume phylogeny, with particular reference to Phaseoleae, Millettieae, and allies. Syst. Bot. 26: 515-536.
27. Kelchner, S.A. 2000. The evolution of non-coding chloroplast DNA and ITS applications to plant systematics. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 87: 482-498.
28. Kelly, C.A. 1986. Extrafloral nectaries: ants, herbivores and fecundity in Cassia fasciculata. Oecologia 69: 600-605.
29. Koptur, S. 1979. Facultative mutualism between weedy vetches bearing extrafloral nectaries and weedy ants in California. Amer. J. Bot. 66: 1016-1020.
30. Larget, B. & Simon, D. 1999. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Molec. Biol. Evol. 16: 750-759.
31. Lewis, G.P. 2005. Tribe Cassieae. Pp. 111-161 in: Lewis, G., Schrire, B., Mackinder, B. & Lock, M. (eds.), Legumes of the World. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
32. Lewis, P.O. 2001. Phylogenetic systematics turns over a new leaf. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 30-37.
33. Marazzi, B., Endress, P.K., Queiroz, L.P. de & Conti, E. 2006. Phylogenetic relationships within Senna (Leguminosae, Cassiinae) based on three chloroplast DNA regions: patterns in the evolution of floral symmetry and extrafloral nectaries. Amer. J. Bot. 93: 288-303.
34. McKey, D. 1989. Interactions between ants and leguminous plants. Pp. 673-718 in: Stirton, C.H. & Zarucchi, J.L. (eds.), Advances in Legume Biology. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 29. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis.
35. Nylander, J.A.A. 2004. MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University. Availalbe from http://www.abc.se/~nylander/.
36. Reeves, G.M., Chase, M.W., Goldblatt, P., Cittes, T. de., Lejeune, B., Fay, M.F., Cox, A.V. & Rudall, P.J. 2001. A phylogenetic analysis of Iridaceae based on four plastid sequence regions: trnL intron, trnL-F spacer, rps4 and rbcL. Amer. J. Bot. 88: 2074-2087.
37. Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574.
38. Rutter, M.T. & Rausher, M.D. 2004. Natural selection on extrafloral nectar production in Chamaecrista fasciculata: the costs and benefits of a mutualism trait. Evolution 58: 2657-2668.
39. Souza, M.G.C. & Benko-Iseppon, A.M. 2004. Cytogenetics and cromosome banding patterns in Caesalpinioideae and Papilionoideae species of Pará, Amazonas, Brazil. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 144: 181-191.
40. Staden, R., Beal, K.F. & Bonfiel, J.K. 1998. The Staden Package. Meth. Molec. Biol. 132: 115-130.
41. Sun, Y., Skinner, D.Z., Liang, G.H. & Hulbert, S.H. 1994. Phylogenetic analysis of Sorghum and related taxa using internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89: 26-32.
42. Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP* Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), v. 4.0 beta 10. Sinauer, Sunderland.
43. Taberlet, P., Gielly, L., Pautou, G. & Bouvet, J. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three noncoding regions of chloroplast DNA. Pl. Molec. Biol. 15: 1105-1109.
44. Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F. & Higgins, D.G. 1997. The Clustal-X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quantity analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 24: 4876-4882.
45. Tucker, S.C. 1996. Trends in evolution of floral ontogeny in Cassia sensu stricto, Senna, and Chamaecrista: Cassieae: Cassiinae): a study in convergence. Amer. J. Bot. 83: 687-711.
46. Van den Berg, C., Goldmam, D.H., Freudenstein, J.V., Pridgeon, K.M., Cameron, K.M. & Chase, M.W. 2005. An overview of the phylogenetic relationships within Epidendroideae inferred from multiple DNA regions and recircumscription of Epidendreae and Arethuseae (Orchida-ceae). Amer. J. Bot. 92: 613-624.
47. Whitten, W.M., Williams, N.H. & Chase, M.W. 2000. Subtribal and generic relationship of Maxillarieae (Orchidaceae) with emphasis on Stanhopeinae: combined molecular evidence. Amer. J. Bot. 87: 1842-1856.