Correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of facial attractiveness in Chinese and US patients after orthodontic treatment

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 136, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 762.e1-762.e14

  Oh, Hee Soo ^a   Korn, Edward L ^b   Zhang, Xiaoyun ^c   Liu, Yan ^c   Xu, Tianmin ^c   Boyd, Robert ^a   Baumrind, Sheldon ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d Arthur A Dugoni School of Dentistry   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70749151833     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.020     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Downs W.B. Variations in facial relationship. Their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod 34 (1948) 812-840
2. Downs W.B. The role of cephalometrics in orthodontic case analysis and diagnosis. Am J Orthod 38 (1952) 162-182
3. Steiner C.C. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod 39 (1953) 729-754
4. Tweed C.H. Evolutionary trends in orthodontics, past, present, and future. Am J Orthod 39 (1953) 81-108
5. Tweed C.H. The Frankfort-mandibular incisor angle (FMIA) in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning and prognosis. Angle Orthod 24 (1954) 121-169
6. Jarabak J.R., and Fizzell J.A. Technique and treatment with light-wire edgewise appliance. 2nd ed. (1972), C.V. Mosby, St Louis
7. Sassouni V. A classification of skeletal facial types. Am J Orthod 55 (1969) 109-123
8. Björk A. The face in profile. Svennsk Tandläkare-Tidskrift 40 (1947) No. 5B, suppl lund
9. Ricketts R.M. Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. Angle Orthod 51 (1981) 115-150
10. Ricketts R.M. Planning treatment on the basis of facial pattern and an estimate of its growth. Angle Orthod 27 (1957) 14-37
11. McNamara J.A. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod 86 (1984) 449-469
12. Arnett G.W., and Bergman R.T. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 103 (1993) 299-31
13. Arnett G.W., Jelic J.S., Kim J., Cummings D.R., Beress A., Worley C.M., et al. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis: diagnosis and treatment planning of dentofacial deformity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116 (1999) 239-253
14. Matoula S., and Pancherz H. Skeletofacial morphology of attractive and nonattractive faces. Angle Orthod 76 (2006) 204-210
15. Tulloch C., Philips C., and Dann C. Cephalometric measures as indicators of facial attractiveness. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 8 (1993) 171-179
16. Kiekens R.M.A., Maltha J.C., Van't Hof M.A., and Kuijpers-Jagtman A.M. Objective measures as indicators for facial esthetics in adolescents. Angle Orthod 76 (2006) 551-556
17. Xu T.M., Korn E.L., Liu Y., Oh H.S., Lee K.H., Boyd R.L., et al. Facial attractiveness: ranking of end-of-treatment facial photographs by pairs of Chinese and US orthodontists. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 134 (2008) 74-84
18. Liu Y., Korn E.L., Oh H.S., Pearson H., Xu T.M., and Baumrind S. Comparison of Chinese and US orthodontists' averaged evaluations of "facial attractiveness" from end-of-treatment facial photographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135 (2009) 621-634
19. Salzman J.A. Roentgenographic cephalometrics (1961), J.B. Lippincott, Philadelphia
20. Riedel R.R. The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion and in normal occlusion. Angle Orthod 22 (1952) 142-145
21. Holdway R.A. A soft tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod 84 (1983) 1-28
22. Holdaway R.A. A soft tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part II. Am J Orthod 85 (1984) 279-293
23. Ricketts R.M. Cephalometric analysis and synthesis. Angle Orthod 31 (1961) 141-156
24. Burstone C.J. Integumental profile. Am J Orthod 44 (1958) 1-25
25. Burstone C.J. Lip posture and its siginificance in treatment planning. Am J Orthod 53 (1967) 262-284
26. Bell W.H., Proffit W.R., and White R.P. Surgical correction of dentofacial deformities. Vol I (1980), W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia p. 137-50
27. Merrifield L.L. The profile line as an aid in critically evaluating facial esthetics. Am J Orthod 52 (1966) 804-822
28. Jacobson A. The "Wits" appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am J Orthod 67 (1975) 125-138
29. Farkas L.G. Anthropometry of the head and face in medicine (1981), Elsevier, New York
30. Yu XH. A radiographic cephalometric study of soft-tissue profile on 180 normal occlusions among Chinese population [thesis]. Beijing: Peking University; 1985.
31. Zhang XZ. Longitudinal study of craniofacial growth of 13-17 years adolescents with normal occlusion [thesis]. Beijing: Peking University; 1995.
32. Yuan D.H., and Zuo Y.P. The soft tissue profile analysis of normal occlusion in the early permanent dentition-a cephalometric study. Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine 1 (2007) 95-98
33. Lucker G.W. Esthetics and a quantitative analysis of facial appearance. In: McNamara Jr. J.A. (Ed). Esthetics and the treatment of facial form. Monograph 28. Craniofacial Growth Series (1993), Center for Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
34. Edler R.J. Background considerations to facial aesthetics. J Orthod 28 (2001) 159-168
35. Wahl N. Orthodontics in 3 millennia. Chapter 7: facial analysis before the advent of the cephalometer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129 (2006) 293-298
36. Peck S., and Peck L. Facial realities and oral esthetics. In: McNamara Jr. J.A. (Ed). Esthetics and the treatment of facial form. Monograph 28. Craniofacial Growth Series (1993), Center for Human Growth and Development; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
37. Giddon D.B., Sconzo R., Kinchen J.A., and Evans C.A. Quantitative comparison of computerized discrete and animated profile preferences. Angle Orthod 66 (1996) 441-448
38. Orsini M.G., Huang G.J., Kiyak A.H., Ramsay D.S., Bollen A.M., Anderson N.K., et al. Methods to evaluate profile preferences for the anteroposterior position of the mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130 (2006) 283-291
39. Ricketts R.M. The biological significance of the divine proportion and Fibonacci series. Am J Orthod 81 (1982) 351-370
40. Olds C. Facial beauty in Western art. In: McNamara J.A. (Ed). Esthetics and the treatment of facial form. Monograph 28. Craniofacial Growth Series (1993), Center for Human Growth and Development; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
41. Naini F.B., Moss J.P., and Gill D.S. The enigma of facial beauty: esthetics, proportions, deformity, and controversy. Am J Orthod 130 (2006) 277-282
42. Euklid. The Elements, Books I-XIII (1991), Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt, Germany
43. Powell N., and Humphries B. Proportions of the aesthetic face (1984), C.M. Thieme-Stratton, New York
44. Clark K. Leonardo Da Vinci. Revised ed. New York: Penguin Books; 1988.
45. Panofsky E. Dürer as a theorist of art. The life and art of Albrecht Dürer. 4th ed (1955), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
46. Gwilt J. The architecture of Marcus Vitruvius Pollio (1826), Priestly and Weale, London
47. Alley T.R., and Cunningham M.R. Averaged faces are attractive, but very attractive faces are not average. Psychol Sci 2 (1991) 123-135
48. Langlois J.H., and Roggman L.A. Attractive faces are only average. Psychol Sci 1 (1990) 115-121
49. Langlois J.H., Roggman L.A., and Musselman L. What is average and what is not average about attractive faces?. Psychol Sci 5 (1994) 214-220
50. Newcombe R.G. Averageness as the ideal. J Orthod 29 (2002) 76-78
51. Henss R. Perceiving age and attractiveness in facial photographs. J Appl Psychol 21 (1991) 933-946
52. Mathes E.W., Brennan S.M., Haugen P.M., and Rice H.B. Rating of physical attractiveness as a function of age. J Soc Psychol 125 (1985) 157-168
53. Grammer K., and Thornhill R. Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. J Comp Psychol 108 (1994) 233-242
54. Rhode G., Roberts J., and Simmons L. Reflections on symmetry and attractiveness. Psychology, Evolution, and Gender 1 (1999) 279-295
55. Sarver D.M. The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 120 (2001) 98-111
56. Sarver D.M., and Ackerman M.B. Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: part 1. Evolution of the concept and dynamic records for smile capture. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124 (2003) 4-12
57. Hulsey C.M. An esthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationships present in the smile. Am J Orthod 57 (1970) 132-144
58. Işi{dotless}ksal E., Hazar S., and Akyalçi{dotless}n S. Smile esthetics: perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129 (2006) 8-16
59. Vanderburg N. The horizontal smile line in adolescent malocclusions. IADR abstract 2583 (2004)
60. Johnston D.J., Hunt O., Burden C.D.E., Stevenson M., and Hepper P. The influence of lower face vertical proportion on facial attractiveness. Eur J Orthod 27 (2005) 349-354
61. Shafiee R., Korn E.L., Pearson H., Boyd R.L., and Baumrind S. Evaluation of facial attractiveness from end-of-treatment facial photographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 133 (2008) 500-508
62. Lundstrom A., Popovich F., and Woodside D.G. Panel assessments of the facial frontal view as related to mandibular growth direction. Eur J Orthod 11 (1989) 290-297