Facial attractiveness: Ranking of end-of-treatment facial photographs by pairs of Chinese and US orthodontists

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 134, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 74-84

  Xu, Tian Min ^a   Korn, Edward L ^b   Liu, Yan ^a   Oh, Hee Soo ^c   Lee, Ki Heon ^d   Boyd, Robert L ^c   Baumrind, Sheldon ^e  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC   (United States)

^d Chonnam National University   (South Korea)

^e Pacific School of Dentistry   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASIAN; CAUCASIAN; CEPHALOMETRY; CHINA; CLASSIFICATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL EDUCATION; ESTHETICS; ETHNOLOGY; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHODONTICS; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; PHOTOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; CEPHALOMETRY; CHINA; COHORT STUDIES; DENTAL MODELS; ESTHETICS; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FACE; FACULTY, DENTAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS I; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS III; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHODONTICS; PHOTOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; SERIAL EXTRACTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 46249084950     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.08.023     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Barrer J.G., and Ghafari J. Silhouette profiles in the assessment of facial esthetics: a comparison of cases treated with various orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod 87 (1985) 385-391
2. Czarnecki S.T., Nanda R.S., and Currier G.F. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 104 (1993) 180-187
3. Cox N.H., and Van der Linden F.P. Facial harmony. Am J Orthod 60 (1971) 175-183
4. Lew K.K., Soh G., and Loh E. Ranking of facial profiles among Asians. J Esthet Dent 4 (1992) 128-130
5. Hier L.A., Evans C.A., and BeGole E.A. Comparison of preferences in lip position using computer animated imaging. Angle Orthod 69 (1999) 231-238
6. Giddon D.B., Sconzo R., Kinchen J.A., and Evans C.A. Quantitative comparison of computerized discrete and animated profile preferences. Angle Orthod 66 (1996) 441-448
7. Maganzini A.L., Tseng J.Y., and Epstein J.Z. Perception of facial esthetics by native Chinese participants by using manipulated digital imagery techniques. Angle Orthod 70 (2000) 393-399
8. Kitay D., BeGole E.A., and Evans C.A. Computer-animated comparison of self-perception with actual profiles of orthodontic and nonorthodontic subjects. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 14 (1999) 125-134
9. Anderson N.K., Evans C.A., and Giddon D.B. Comparison of perceptions of computer- animated left- and right-facing profiles. J Prosthodont 8 (1999) 72-79
10. Soh J., Chew M.T., and Wong H.B. A comparative assessment of the perception of Chinese facial profile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 127 (2005) 692-699
11. Riedel R.A. An analysis of dentofacial relationships. Am J Orthod 43 (1957) 103-119
12. Peck H., and Peck S. A concept of facial esthetics. Angle Orthod 40 (1970) 284-317
13. Bell R., Kiyak H.A., Joondeph D.R., McNeill R.W., and Wallen T.R. Perceptions of facial profile and their influence on the decision to undergo orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod 88 (1985) 323-332
14. Prahl-Andersen B., Boersma H., van der Linden F.P.G.M., and Moore A.W. Perceptions of dentofacial morphology by laypersons, general dentists and orthodontists. J Am Dent Assoc 98 (1979) 209-212
15. Peerlings R.H., Kuijpers-Jagtman A.M., and Hoeksma J.B. A photographic scale to measure facial esthetics. Eur J Orthod 17 (1995) 101-109
16. Kerr W.J.S., and O'Donnell J.M. Panel perception of facial attractiveness. Br J Orthod 17 (1990) 299-304
17. Foster E.J. Profile preference among diversified groups. Angle Orthod 43 (1973) 34-40
18. Cochrane S.M., Cunningham S.J., and Hunt N.P. Perceptions of facial appearance by orthodontists and the general public. J Clin Orthod 31 (1997) 164-168
19. Cochrane S.M., Cunningham S.J., and Hunt N.P. A comparison of the perception of facial profile by the general public and 3 groups of clinicians. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 14 (1999) 291-295
20. Sushner N.I. A photographic study of the soft-tissue profile of the Negro population. Am J Orthod 72 (1977) 373-385
21. Hwang H.S., Kim W.S., and McNamara Jr. J.A. Ethnic differences in the soft tissue profile of Korean and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Angle Orthod 72 (2002) 72-80
22. Mantzikos T. Esthetic soft tissue profile preferences among the Japanese population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 114 (1998) 1-7
23. Türkkahraman H., and Gökalp H. Facial profile preferences among various layers of Turkish population. Angle Orthod 74 (2004) 640-647
24. Mejia-Maidl M., Evans C.A., Viana G., Anderson N.K., and Giddon D.B. Preferences for facial profiles between Mexican Americans and Caucasians. Angle Orthod 75 (2005) 953-958
25. Holdaway R.A. A soft tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod 84 (1983) 1-28
26. Ricketts R.M. Planning treatment on the basis of facial pattern and an estimate of its growth. Angle Orthod 27 (1957) 14-37
27. Burstone C.J. Integumental contour and extension patterns. Angle Orthod 23 (1959) 146-157
28. Hsu B.S. Comparisons of the five analytic reference lines of the horizontal lip position: their consistency and sensivity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 104 (1993) 355-360
29. Ackerman J.L., Proffit W.R., and Sarver D.M. The emerging soft tissue paradigm in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Clin Orthod Res 2 (1999) 49-52
30. Bergman R.T. Cephalometric soft tissue facial analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116 (1999) 373-389
31. Arnett G.W., Jelic J.S., Kim J., Cummings D.R., Beress A., Worley C.M., et al. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis (diagnosis and treatment planning of dentofacial deformity). Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116 (1999) 239-253
32. Arnett G.W., and Bergman R.T. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning (part II). Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 103 (1993) 395-411
33. Arnett G.W., and Bergman R.T. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning (part I). Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 103 (1993) 299-312
34. Holdaway R.A. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning (part I). Am J Orthod 84 (1983) 1-28
35. Merrifield L.L. The profile line as an aid in critically evaluating facial esthetics. Am J Orthod 52 (1966) 804-822
36. Korn E.L., and Graubard B.I. Analysis of health surveys (1999), Wiley, New York 29
37. Tatarunaite E., Playle R., Hood K., Shaw W., and Richmond S. Facial attractiveness: a longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 127 (2005) 676-682
38. Langlois J.H., Kalakanis L.E., Rubenstein A.J., Larson A.D., Hallamam M.J., and Smoot M.T. Maxims or myths of beauty: a meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol Bull 126 (2000) 390-423
39. Feingold A. Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychol Bull 111 (1992) 304-341
40. Phillips C., Tulloch C., and Dann C. Rating of facial attractiveness. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 20 (1992) 214-220