A multivariate, multilevel analysis of the relationship between cognitive abilities and scholastic achievement

Journal of Individual Differences

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 188-197

  Freund, Philipp Alexander ^a   Holling, Heinz ^a   Preckel, Franzis ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRIER   (Germany)

Author keywords

BIS model; Cognitive abilities; Multilevel models; Multivariate modeling; Scholastic achievement

Indexed keywords

EID: 70450200383     PISSN: 16140001     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001.28.4.188     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bates C., Nettelbeck T. Primary school teachers' judgments of reading achievement. Educational Psychology 2001, 21:177-187.
2. Baumert J., Artelt C., Klieme E., Neubrand M., Prenzel M., Schiefele U., et al. (German PISA Consortium). PISA 2000 - Ein differenzierter Blick auf die Länder der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. [PISA 2000 - A differentiated view on the states of the FRG] 2002, Leske & Budrich, Opladen, Germany.
3. Beauducel A., Kersting M. Fluid and crystallized intelligence and the Berlin model of intelligence structure (BIS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment 2002, 18:97-112.
4. Bucik V., Neubauer A.C. Bimodality in the Berlin model of intelligence structure (BIS): A replication study. Personality and Individual Differences 1996, 21:987-1005.
5. Deary I.J., Strand S., Smith P., Fernandes C. Intelligence and educational achievement. Intelligence 2007, 35:13-21.
6. Duckworth A.L., Seligman M.E.P. Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology 2006, 98:198-208.
7. Feinberg A., Shapiro E. Accuracy of teacher judgments in predicting oral reading fluency. School Psychology Quarterly 2003, 18:52-65.
8. Freeman J. Cultural influences on gifted gender achievement. High Ability Studies 2004, 15:7-23.
9. Goldstein H. Methods in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 1997, 8:369-395.
10. Goldstein H. Multilevel statistical models 2003, Arnold, London. 3rd ed.
11. Goldstein H., Rasbash J., Yang M., Woodhouse G., Pan H., Nuttall D., et al. A multilevel analysis of school examination results. Oxford Review of Education 1993, 19:425-433.
12. Guilford J.P. The nature of human intelligence 1967, McGraw-Hill, New York.
13. Halpern D.F. Sex differences in cognitive abilities 2000, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
14. Hoge R.D., Coladarci T. Teacher-based judgments of academic achievement: A review of literature. Review of Educational Research 1989, 59:297-313.
15. Holling H., Preckel F., Vock M. Intelligenzdiagnostik. [Diagnosing intelligence] 2004, Hogrefe, Göttingen.
16. Hosenfeld I., Köller O., Baumert J. Why sex differences in mathematics achievement disappear in German secondary schools: A reanalysis of the German TIMSS-data. Studies in Educational Evaluation 1999, 25:143-161.
17. Ingenkamp K. Die Fragwürdigkeit der Zensurengebung. [Questioning school grades] 1971, Beltz, Weinheim.
18. Jäger A.O. Dimensionen der Intelligenz. [Dimensions of intelligence] 1967, Hogrefe, Göttingen.
19. Jäger A.O. Mehrmodale Klassifikation von Intelligenzleistungen. Experimentell kontrollierte Weiterentwicklung eines deskriptiven Intelligenzstrukturmodells. [Multimodal classification of intelligence achievement: Experimentally controlled, further development of a descriptive intelligence structure model]. Diagnostica 1982, 28:195-226.
20. Jäger A.O. Intelligenzstrukturforschung: Konkurrierende Modelle, neue Entwicklungen, Perspektiven. [Structural research on intelligence: Competing models, new developments, perspectives]. Psychologische Rundschau 1984, 35:21-35.
21. Jäger A.O., Holling H., Preckel F., Schulze R., Vock M., Süß H.-M., et al. Berliner Intelligenzstruktur-Test für Jugendliche: Begabungs- und Hochbegabungsdiagnostik (BIS-HB). [Berlin structure of intelligence test for youth: Assessment of talent and giftedness] 2006, Hogrefe, Göttingen.
22. Jensen A.R. The g factor: The science of mental ability 1998, Praeger, Westport, CT.
23. Krumm, S., Ziegler, M., & Bühner, M. (submitted). Intelligence and working memory as predictors of school performance.
24. Preckel F., Holling H., Wiese M. Intelligence and creativity in gifted and nongifted students: An investigation of threshold theory. Personality and Individual Differences 2006, 40:159-170.
25. Rindermann H., Neubauer A.C. Processing speed, intelligence, creativity, and school performance: Testing of causal hypotheses using structural equation models. Intelligence 2004, 32:573-589.
26. Strand S. Comparing the predictive validity of reasoning tests and national end of Key Stage 2 tests: Which tests are the best?. British Educational Research Journal 2006, 32:209-225.
27. Süß H.-M. Prädiktive Validität der Intelligenz im schulischen und außerschulischen Bereich. [Predictive validity of intelligence in school-related and external domains]. Perspektiven der Intelligenzforschung [Perspectives on intelligence research] 2001, 109-135. Lengerich, Pabst, Germany. E. Stern, J. Guthke (Eds.).
28. Yang M., Goldstein H., Browne W., Woodhouse G. Multivariate multilevel analyses of examination results. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 2002, 165:137-153.
29. Wilhelm O., Schulze R. The relation of speeded and unspeeded reasoning with mental speed. Intelligence 2002, 30:537-554.