Gender issues among academic AMS members: Comparisons with the 1993 membership survey

Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

Volumn 90, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1180-1191

  Donna, Tucker ^a   Ginther, Donna K ^a   Winkler, Julie A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE; GENDER ISSUES; GEOSCIENCES; LOWER AVERAGE; WOMEN FACULTY;

TEACHING; WAGES;

SURVEYS;

EID: 70450198937     PISSN: 00030007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1175/2009BAMS2538.1     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. American Institute of Physics, 2008: Statistical research center. [Available online at www.aip.org/statistics.]
2. Bilimoria, D., S. R. Perry, X. Liang, E. Palo Stoller, P. Higgens, and C. Taylor, 2006: How do female and male faculty members construct job satisfaction? The roles of perceived institutional leadership and mentoring and their mediating processes. J. Technol. Transfer, 31,355-365.
3. Charlevoix, D. J., and D. M. Stanitski, 2008: AMS Membership Survey results: A synopsis of academic members of the AMS. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 89,896-900.
4. Feder, T., 2007: Grants to women come up short in pilot study. Phys. Today, 60,35-36.
5. Frehill, L., A. Javurek-Humig, and C. Jeser-Cannavale, 2006: Women in engineering: A review of the 2005 literature. Mag. Soc. Women Eng., (summer), 1-18.
6. Gardiner, M., M. Tiggemann, H. Kearns, and. K. Marshall, 2007: Show me the money! An empirical analysis of mentoring outcomes for women in academia. Higher Educ Res. Dev., 26,425-442.
7. Ginther, D. K., 2004: Why women earn less: Economic explanations for the gender salary gap in science. AWIS Mag, 33,6-10.
8. -, and S. Kahn, 2009: Does science promote women? Evidence from academia 1973-2001. Science and Engineering Careers in the United States, R. B. Freeman and D. F. Goroff, Eds., University of Chicago Press for NBER Science Engineering Workforce Project.
9. Handelsman, J., and Coauthors, 2005: More women in science. Science, 309,1190-1191.
10. Huit, C., R. Callister, and K. Sullivan, 2005: Is there a global warming toward women in academia? Lib. Educ, 91, 50-57.
11. Klawe, M., T. Whitney, and C. Simard, 2009: Women in Computing-Take 2. Commun. ACM, 52,68-76.
12. Marcus, N., 2005: Oceanography, science and academia: Women making a difference. Oceanogr., 18,51-55.
13. Marschke, R., S. Laursen, J. McCarl Nielsen, and P. Rankin, 2007: Demographic inertia revisited: An immodest proposal to achieve equitable gender representation among faculty in higher education. J. Higher Educ., 78,1-26.
14. Monroe, K., S. Ozyurt, T. Wrigley, and A. Alexander, 2008: Gender equality in academia: Bad news from the trenches, and some possible solutions. Perspect. Politics, 6, 215-233.
15. Murillo, S. T., R. Czujko, R. Y. Chu, H. A. Friedman, and J. A. Winkler, 2008a: The 2005 AMS Membership Survey: Insights into a professional society. Bull Amer. Meteor. Soc., 89,726.
16. -, R. E. Pandya, R. Y. Chu, J. A. Winkler, R. Czujko, and E. M. C. Cutrim, 2008b: An overview and longitudinal analysis of the demographics of the AMS. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 89,727-733.
17. National Science Foundation, 2008: Survey of earned doctorates. [Available online at www.nsf.gov/ statistics/showsrvy.cfm?srvy-CatID=2&srvy- Seri=l.]
18. Powell, K., 2007: Beyond, the glass ceiling. Nature, 448, 98-100.
19. Settles, I. H., L. M. Cortina, J. Malley, and A. J. Stewart, 2006: The climate for women in academic science: The good, the bad and the changeable. Psychol. Women Quart., 30,47-58.
20. Stanitski, D. M. and D. J. Charlevoix, 2008: Who are the student members of the AMS? Bull Amer. Meteor. Soc., 89, 892-895.
21. Tierney, J., 2008: A new frontier for Title IX: Science. New York Times, 15 July 2008. [Available online at www.nytimes.com/2008/07/15/science/15tier. html?-r=l&scp=l&sq=title+IX.+science&st=nyt&o ref=slogin.]
22. Trower, C. A., and R. P. Chait, 2002: Faculty diversity: Too little for too long. Harvard Mag., (March-April), 1-18.
23. van Anders, S. M., 2004: Why the academic pipeline leaks: Fewer men than women perceive barriers to becoming professors. Sex Roles, 51, 511-521.
24. Waltman, J., and B. Sullivan, 2007: Creating and supporting flexible work-life environment for faculty and staff. Eff. Pract. Acad. Leaders, 2,1-16.
25. Winkler, J. A., D. Tucker, and A. K. Smith, 1996: Salaries and advancement of women faculty in atmospheric science: Some reasons for concern. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77,473-490.
26. Wolf-Wendel, L., and K. Ward., 2006: Academic life and motherhood: Variations by institutional type. Higher Education, 52,487-521. (Pubitemid 43814033)
27. Xu, Y. J., 2008: Gender disparity in STEM disciplines: A. study of faculty attrition and turnover intentions. Res. Higher Educ., 49,607-624.
28. Zevin, S. F and K. Seitter, 1994: Results of a survey of society membership. Bull Amer. Meteor. Soc., 75, 1855-1866.