More women in science

Science

Volumn 309, Issue 5738, 2005, Pages 1190-1191

  Handelsman, Jo ^a,b,c   Cantor, Nancy ^d   Carnes, Molly ^c,e   Denton, Denice ^f   Fine, Eve ^c   Grosz, Barbara ^g   Hinshaw, Virginia ^h   Marrett, Cora ^b   Rosser, Sue ⁱ   Shalala, Donna ^j   Sheridan, Jennifer ^c  

^a HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

^d SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

ⁱ GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;

BIOLOGY; CAREER; COMPUTER; EDUCATION; EMPLOYMENT; ENGINEERING; FAMILY LIFE; LAW; MATHEMATICS; NATURAL SCIENCE; PHYSICS; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SCIENCE; SEX ROLE; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES; ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; CAREER MOBILITY; DECISION MAKING; FAMILY; FEMALE; HUMAN; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; UNIVERSITY;

CAREER CHOICE; CAREER MOBILITY; EDUCATION, GRADUATE; FACULTY; FAMILY; FEMALE; HUMANS; PERSONNEL SELECTION; PREJUDICE; SCIENCE; UNIVERSITIES; WOMEN;

EID: 23844447000     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1113252     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Bill S. 568 in the 96th Congress (http://thomas. loc.gov/).
2. American Sociological Association Council, 28 February 2005 (www.asanet.org/public/summers.html).
3. E. S. Spelke, "Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science: A critical review," draft, 20 April 2005 (www.wjh.harvard. edu/-lds/sexsci/).
4. "The science of gender and science: Pinker vs. Spelke, a debate," 10 May 2005 (www.edge.org/documents/ archive/edge160.html#d).
5. J. F. Milem, in Compelling Interest: Examining the Evidence on Racial Dynamics in Colleges and Universities, M. Chang, D. Witt, J. Jones, K. Hakuta, Eds. (Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, CA, 2003), pp. 126-169.
6. Related resources, see http://wiseli.engr.wisc.edu/ Products/MoreWomen. htm.
7. P. L. McLeod et al., Small Croup Res. 27, 248 (1996).
8. C. J. Nemeth, Adv. Group Process. 2, 57 (1985).
9. K. Miner-Rubino, L. M. Cortina, J. Occup. Health Psychot. 9, 107 (2004).
10. For information on ADVANCE, see www.nsf.gov/ funding/pgm_summ.jsp? pims_id=5383.
11. L. H. Summers, S. E. Hyman, 16 May 2005 (www. president.harvard.edu/ speeches/2005/0516_womensci.html).
12. M. F. Fox, in Equal Rites, Unequal Outcomes: Women in American Research Universities, L. S. Hornig, Ed. (Kluwer Academic, New York, 2003), pp. 91-109.
13. S. Park, J. Higher Educ. 67, 46 (1996).
14. E. Seymour, N. Hewitt, Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences (Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1997).
15. S.V. Rosser, The Science Class Ceiling: Academic Women Scientists and the Struggle to Succeed (Routledge, New York, 2004).
16. V. Valian, Why So Slow: Advancement of Women (MIT Press, Boston, MA, 1999).
17. J. F. Dovidio, S. L. Gaeitner, Psychol. Sci. 11, 315 (2000).
18. C. Wenneras, A. Wold, Nature 387, 341 (1997).
19. F. Trix, C. Psenka, Discourse Soc. 14, 191 (2003).
20. C. Goldin, C. Rouse, Am. Econ. Rev. 90, 715 (2000).
21. R. F. Martell, J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 21, 23 (1991).
22. J. Handelsman, J. Sheridan, E. Fine, M. Carnes, 4 April 2005 (http://wiseli.engr.wisc.edu/Products/ top_10_tips.pdf).
23. D. J. Nelson, "Nelson diversity surveys" (Diversity in Science, Norman, OK, 2004) (http://cheminfo. chem.ou.edu/-djn/diversity/top50.html).
24. NSF survey of earned doctorates/doctorate records file, WebCASPAR (http://webcaspar.nsf.gov).