Generalizability analysis for performance assessments of student achievement or school effectiveness

Educational and Psychological Measurement

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 373-399

  Cronbach, Lee J ^a   Linn, Robert L ^a   Brennan, Robert L ^a   Haertel, Edward H ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031476178     PISSN: 00131644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013164497057003001     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Brennan, R. L. (1984). Some statistical issues in generalizability theory (ACT Technical Bulletin No. 46). Iowa City, IA: ACT.
3. Brennan, R. L. (1992a). Elements of generalizability theory (2nd ed.). Iowa City, IA: ACT.
4. Brennan, R. L. (1992b). Generalizability theory. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 11(4), 27-34.
5. Brennan, R. L. (1996a). Conditional standard errors of measurement in generalizability theory (ITP Occasional Paper No. 40). Iowa City: Iowa Testing Programs, University of Iowa.
6. Brennan, R. L. (1996b). Generalizability of performance assessments. In G. W. Phillips (Ed.), Technical issues in performance assessments (pp. 19-58). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
7. Brennan, R. L., Harris, D. J., & Hanson, B. A. (1987). The bootstrap and other procedures for examining the variability of estimated variance components in testing contexts (ACT Research Report Series No. 87-7). Iowa City, IA: ACT.
8. Cronbach, L. J. (1995). A valedictory: Reflections on 60 years in educational testing. Board Bulletin. Board on Testing and Assessment, National Research Council, Washington, DC. (Available through National Technical Information Service)
9. Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements. New York: John Wiley.
10. Crone, L. J., Long, M. H., Franklin, B. J., & Holbrook, A. M. (1994). Composite versus component scores: Consistency of school effectiveness classification. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 303-321.
11. CTB/McGraw-Hill. (1994). California Learning Assessment data. [Unpublished analysis.]
12. Gao, X., Shavelson, R., & Baxter, G. P. (1994). Generalizability of large-scale performance assessments in science: Promises and problems. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 323-334.
13. Kolen, M. J., Hanson, B. A., & Brennan, R. L. (1992). Conditional standard errors of measurement. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 285-307.
14. Koretz, D., Stecher, B., Klein, S., & McCaffrey, D. (1994). The Vermont Portfolio Assessment Program: Findings and implications. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 13(3), 5-16.
15. Linn, R. L., Burton, E., DeStefano, L., & Hanson, M. (1996). Generalizability of New Standards Project 1993 pilot study tasks in mathematics. Applied Measurement in Education, 9, 201-214.
16. Livingston, S., & Lewis, C. (1995). Estimating the consistency and accuracy of classifications based on test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32, 179-198.
17. Mislevy, R. J. (1994). Evidence and inference in educational assessment. Psychometrika, 59, 439-483.
18. Searle, S. R., Casella, G., & McCulloch, C. E. (1992) Variance components. New York: John Wiley.
19. Select Committee. (1994). Sampling and statistical procedures used in the California Learning Assessment System. Sacramento: California State Department of Education. (Reprinted in Cronbach, 1995)
20. Shavelson, R. J. (1991). Generalizability theory and military performance measurements: I. Individual performance. In A. K. Wigdor & B. F. Green, Jr. (Eds.), Performance assessment in the workplace: Vol. 2. Technical issues (pp. 207-257). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
21. Shavelson, R. J., & Webb, N. M. (1991). Generalizability theory: A primer. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.