How we can promote behavior that serves all of us in the future

Social Issues and Policy Review

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 127-157

  Van Lange, Paul A M ^a   Joireman, Jeff A ^b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449632360     PISSN: 17512395     EISSN: 17512409     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-2409.2008.00013.x     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Allison S T, Messick D M. Social decision heuristics in the use of shared resources. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 1990, 3:23-42.
2. Au W T, Kwong J Y Y, Suleiman R, Budescu D V, Fischer I, Messick D M. Measurements and effects of social-value orientation in social dilemmas: A review. Contemporary psychological research on social dilemmas 2004, 71-98. In, Eds, pp, New York, Cambridge University Press
3. Axelrod R. The evolution of cooperation 1984, New York, Basic Books
4. Batson C D. Why act for the public good. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1994, 20:603-610.
5. Batson C D, Ahmad N. Empathy-induced altruism in a prisoner's dilemma II: What if the target of empathy has defected. European Journal of Social Psychology 2001, 31:25-36.
6. Batson C D, Batson J G, Todd R M, Brummett B H, Shaw L L, Aldeguer C M R. Empathy and collective good: Caring for one of the others in a social dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1995, 68:619-631.
7. Batson C D, Moran T. Empathy-induced altruism in a prisoner's dilemma. European Journal of Social Psychology 1999, 29:909-924.
8. Bornstein G. The free-rider problem in intergroup conflicts over step-level and continuous public goods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1992, 62:597-606.
9. Brewer M B, Kramer R M. Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 50:543-549.
10. Camerer C, Thaler R H. Anomalies: Ultimatums, dictators and manners. Journal of Economic Perspectives 1995, 9:209-219.
11. Cialdini R B, Brown S L, Lewis B P, Luce C, Neuberg S L. Reinterpreting the empathy-altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1997, 73:481-494.
12. Clark M S, Mills J. The difference between communal and exchange relationships: What it is and is not. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1993, 19:684-691.
13. Dovidio J F, Piliavan J A, Schroeder D A, Penner L A. The social psychology of prosocial behavior 2006, Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum
14. Ebreo A, Vining J. How similar are recycling and waste reduction? Future orientation and reasons for reducing waste as predictors of self-reported behavior. Environment and Behavior 2001, 33:424-448.
15. Eek D, Gärling T. Effects of joint outcome, equality, and efficiency on assessments of social value orientations 2000, Goteborg University, Sweden
16. Eisenberger N I, Lieberman M D, Williams K D. Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science 2003, 302:290-292.
17. Elliott C S, Hayward D M, Canon S. Institutional framing: Some experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1998, 35:455-464.
18. Fehr E, Gächter S. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 2002, 415:137-140.
19. Fiske A P. The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review 1992, 99:689-723.
20. Gaertner S L, Dovidio J F. Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model 2000, Philadelphia, PA, Psychology Press
21. Gärling T. Value priorities, social value orientations, and cooperation in social dilemmas. British Journal of Social Psychology 1999, 38:397-408.
22. Güth W, Schmittberger R, Schwarze B. An experimental analysis of ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1982, 3:367-388.
23. Henrich J, Boyd R, Bowles S, Camerer C, Fehr E, Gintis H, McElreath R, Alvard M, Barr A, Ensminger J, Henrich N S, Hill N, Gil-White F, Gurven M, Marlowe F W, Patton J Q, Tracer D. Economic man" in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2005, 28:795-855.
24. Higgins E T, Zanna M P. Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in experimental social psychology 1998, Vol. 30:1-46. In, Ed, pp, New York, Academic Press
25. Holmes J G. Interpersonal expectations as the building blocks of social cognition: An interdependence theory perspective. Personal Relationships 2002, 9:1-26.
26. Insko C A, Schopler J, Sedikides C, Schopler J, Insko C A. Differential distrust of groups and individuals. Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior: Toward a closer union 1998, 75-107. In, Eds, pp, Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum
27. Joireman J A, Anderson J, Strathman A. The aggression paradox: Understanding links among aggression, sensation seeking, and the consideration of future consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003, 84:1287-1302.
28. Joireman J A, Daniels D, George-Falvy J, Kamdar D. Organizational citizenship behaviors as a function of empathy, consideration of future consequences, and employee time horizon: An initial exploration using an in-basket simulation of OCBs. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2006, 39:2266-2292.
29. Joireman J, Duell B. Mother Teresa vs. Ebenezer Scrooge: Mortality salience leads proselfs to endorse self-transcendent values (unless proselfs are reassured). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2005, 31:307-320.
30. Joireman J A, Kamdar D, Daniels D, Duell B. Good citizens to the end? It depends: Empathy and concern with future consequences moderate the impact of a short-term time horizon on OCBs. Journal of Applied Psychology 2006, 91:1307-1320.
31. Joireman J A, Kuhlman D M, Van Lange P A M, Doi T, Shelley G P. Perceived rationality, morality, and power of social choice as a function of interdependence structure and social value orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology 2003, 33:413-437.
32. Joireman J A, Lasane T P, Bennett J, Richards D, Solaimani S. Integrating social value orientation and the consideration of future consequences within the extended norm activation model of proenvironmental behavior. British Journal of Social Psychology 2001, 40:133-155.
33. Joireman J, Sprott D, Spangenberg E. Fiscal responsibility and the consideration of future consequences. Personality and Individual Differences 2005, 39:1159-1168.
34. Joireman J, Strathman A, Balliet D, Sanna L, Chang E. Considering future consequences: An integrative model. Judgments over time: The interplay of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors 2006, 82-99. In, Eds, pp, Oxford, Oxford University Press
35. Joireman J, Van Lange P A M, Van Vugt M. Who cares about the environmental impact of cars? Those with an eye toward the future. Environment and Behavior 2004, 36:187-206.
36. Joireman J A, Van Lange P A M, Van Vugt M, Wood A, Vander Leest T, Lambert C. Structural solutions to social dilemmas: A field study on commuters' willingness to fund improvements in public transit. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2001, 31:504-526.
37. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47:263-292.
38. Kelley H H, Holmes J W, Kerr N L, Reis H T, Rusbult C E, Van Lange P A M. An atlas of interpersonal situations 2003, New York, Cambridge
39. Kelley H H, Stahelski A J. Social interaction basis of cooperators' and competitors' beliefs about others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1970, 16:66-91.
40. Kelley H H, Thibaut J W. Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence 1978, New York, Wiley
41. Kenrick D T, Becker D V, Butner J, Li N P, Maner J K, Sterelny K, Fitness J. Evolutionary cognitive science: Adding what and why to how the mind works. From mating to mentality: Evaluating evolutionary psychology 2003, 13-38. In, Eds, pp, New York, Psychology Press
42. Komorita S S, Parks C D. Interpersonal relations: Mixed-motive interaction. Annual Review of Psychology 1995, 46:183-207.
43. Kortenkamp K V, Moore C F. Time, uncertainty, and individual differences in decisions to cooperate in resource dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2006, 32:603-615.
44. Kuhlman D M, Marshello A. Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategic effects in prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975, 32:922-931.
45. Liberman N, Trope Y, McCrea S M, Sherman S J. The effect of level of construal on the temporal distance of activity enactment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2007, 43:143-149.
46. Liebrand W B G, Jansen R W T L, Rijken V M, Suhre C J M. Might over morality: Social values and the perception of other players in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1986, 22:203-215.
47. Liebrand W B G, Van Run G J. The effects of social motives on behavior in social dilemmas in two cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1985, 21:86-102.
48. McClintock C G. Social motivation-a set of propositions. Behavioral Science 1972, 17:438-454.
49. McClintock C G, Liebrand W B G. Role of interdependence structure, individual value orientation, and another's strategy in social decision making: A transformational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1988, 55:396-409.
50. McClintock C G, Moskowitz J M. Children's preference for individualistic, cooperative, and competitive outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1976, 34:543-555.
51. Messick D M, Brewer M B, Wheeler L, Shaver P. Solving social dilemmas: A review. Review of personality and social psychology 1983, Vol. 4:11-44. In, Eds, pp, Beverly Hills, CA, Sage
52. Messick D M, McClintock C G. Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1968, 4:1-25.
53. Messick D M, Thorngate W B. Relative gain maximization in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1967, 3:85-101.
54. Mikula G, Petri B, Tanzer N K. What people regard as unjust: Types and structures of everyday experiences of injustice. European Journal of Social Psychology 1990, 20:133-149.
55. Murnighan J K, Roth A E. Expecting continued play in prisoner's dilemma games: A test of several models. Journal of Conflict Resolution 1983, 27:279-300.
56. Olweus D. Stability of aggression patterns in males: A review. Psychological Bulletin 1979, 86:852-875.
57. Penner L A, Dovidio J F, Piliavin J A, Schroeder D A. Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology 2005, 56:365-392.
58. Poppe M, Valkenberg H. Effects of gain versus loss and certain versus probable outcomes on social value orientations. European Journal of Social Psychology 2003, 33:331-337.
59. Reinders Folmer C, Van Lange P A M, Klapwijk A. One for all: Psychological differences between acting as group representative and as an individual 2007, Unpublished manuscript, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
60. Rusbult C E, Martz J M. Remaining in an abusive relationship: An investment model analysis of nonvoluntary commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1995, 21:558-571.
61. Rusbult C E, Van Lange P A M. Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology 2003, 54:351-375.
62. Rutte C G, Wilke H A M, Liebrand W B G, Messick D M, Wilke H A M. Goals, expectations and behavior in a social dilemma situation. Social dilemmas 1992, 289-305. In, Eds, pp, Elmsford, NY, Pergamon Press
63. Samuelson C D. A multiattribute evaluation approach to structural change in resource dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1993, 55:298-324.
64. Schroeder D A, Steel J E, Woodell A J, Bembenek A F. Justice within social dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2003, 7:374-387.
65. Smeesters D, Warlop L, Van Avermaet E, Corneille O, Yzerbyt V. Do not prime hawks with doves: The interplay of construct activation and consistency of social value orientation on cooperative behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003, 84:972-987.
66. Strathman A, Gleicher F, Boninger D S, Edwards C S. The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1994, 66:742-752.
67. Thibaut J W, Walker L. Procedural justice: A psychological analysis 1975, Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum
68. Utz S, Ouwerkerk J, Van Lange P A M. Is cooperation smart or dumb? Effects of priming competence on cooperation. European Journal of Social Psychology 2004, 34:317-332.
69. Van Beest I, Andeweg R, Koning L, Van Lange P A M. Do groups exclude others more readily than individuals in coalition formation. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 2008, 11:69-81.
70. Van Beest I, Wilke H A M, Van Dijk E. The excluded player in coalition formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2003, 29:237-247.
71. Van Den Bos K, Wilke H A M, Lind E A. When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 75:1449-1458.
72. Van Dijk E, Wilke H A M. Differential interests, equity, and public good provision. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1993, 29:1-16.
73. Van Goozen S H M, Frijda N H, Van de Poll N E. Anger and aggression during role playing: Gender differences between hormonally treated male and female transexuals and controls. Aggressive Behavior 1995, 21:257-273.
74. Van Lange P A M. The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 77:337-349.
75. Van Lange P A M, Agnew C R, Harinck F, Steemers G. From game theory to real life: How social value orientation affects willingness to sacrifice in ongoing close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1997, 73:1330-1344.
76. Van Lange P A M, De Cremer D, Van Dijk E, Van Vugt M, Kruglanski A W, Higgings E T. Self-interest and beyond: Basic principles of social interaction. Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles 2007, 540-561. In, Eds, 2nd ed., pp, New York, Guilford
77. Van Lange P A M, Kuhlman D M. Social value orientations and impressions of a partner's honesty and intelligence: A test of the might versus morality effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1994, 67:126-141.
78. Van Lange P A M, Otten W, De Bruin E N M, Joireman J A. Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1997, 73:733-746.
79. Van Lange P A M, Ouwerkerk J W, Tazelaar M J A. How to overcome the detrimental effects of noise in social interaction: The benefits of generosity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 82:768-780.
80. Van Lange P A M, Semin-Goossens A. The boundaries of reciprocal cooperation. European Journal of Social Psychology 1998, 28:847-854.
81. Van Lange P A M, Visser K. Locomotion in social dilemmas: How we adapt to cooperative, Tit-for-Tat, and noncooperative partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 77:762-773.
82. Van Vugt M, Hart C M. Social identity as social glue: The origins of group loyalty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2004, 86:585-598.
83. Vierikko E, Pulkkinen L, Kaprio J, Rose R J. Genetic and environmental sources of continuity and change in teacher-rated aggression during early adolescence. Aggressive Behavior 2006, 32:308-320.
84. Wit A P, De Rooij M, Van Lange P A M. Social value orientation and parochial cooperation 2007, Unpublished data
85. Wit A P, Kerr N L. Me versus just us versus us all" categorization and cooperation in nested social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 83:616-637.
86. Yamagishi T. The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 51:110-116.
87. Zimbardo P, Boyd J. Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 77:1271-1288.