Perceived rationality, morality, and power of social choice as a function of interdependence structure and social value orientation

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 413-437

  Joireman, Jeffrey A ^a   Kuhlman, D Michael ^d   Van Lange, Paul A M ^b   Doi, Toshiaki ^c   Shelley, Gregory P ^d  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c TOKYO UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE   (Japan)

^d NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037644842     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.155     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Beggan, J. K., Messick, D. M., & Allison, S. T. (1988). Social values and egocentric bias: Two tests of the might over morality hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 606-611.
2. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (1995). Impact of social value orientations on negotiator cognition and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1178-1188.
3. Griesinger, D. W., & Livingston, J. W. (1973). Toward a model of interpersonal motivation in experimental games. Behavioral Science, 18, 173-188.
4. Hamburger, H. (1979). Games as models of social phenomena. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
5. Joireman, J. A., Van Lange, P. A. M., Kuhlman, D. M., Van Vugt, M., & Shelley, G. P. (1997). An interdependence analysis of commuting decisions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 441-463.
6. Kahan, J. P. (1974). Rationality, the prisoner's dilemma, and population. Journal of Social Issues, 30, 189-210.
7. Kelley, H. H., & Stahelski, A. J. (1970). Errors in perceptions of intentions in a mixed-motive game. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 379-400.
8. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: John Wiley.
9. Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental approach. In T. Lickona (Ed.)., Moral development and behavior: Theory, research, and social issues (pp. 31-43). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
10. Kramer, R. M., McClintock, C. G., & Messick, D. M. (1986). Social values and cooperative response to a simulated resource conservation crisis. Journal of Personality, 54, 576-592.
11. Kuhlman, D. M., Brown, C. E., & Teta, P. (1992). Cooperation, individualism, and competition as moderators of verbal and social orientation interpretations of cooperation and defection in social dilemmas. In W. Liebrand, D. Messick, & H. Wilke (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 111-132). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
12. Kuhlman, D. M., Camac, C. R., & Cunha, D. A. (1986). Individual differences in social orientation. In H. Wilke, D. Messick, & C. Rutte (Eds.), Experimental social dilemmas (pp. 151-176). New York: Verlag Peter Lang.
13. Kuhlman, D. M., & Marshello, A. F. J. (1975). Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategic effects in prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 922-931.
14. Kuhlman, D. M., & Wimberley, D. L. (1976). Expectations of choice behavior held by prosocials, competitors, and individualists across four classes of experimental game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 69-81.
15. Liebrand, W. B. G., Jansen, R. W. T. L., Rijken, V. M., & Suhre, C. J. M. (1986a). Might over morality: Social values and the perception of other players in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 203-215.
16. Liebrand, W. B. G., & McClintock, C. G. (1988). The ring measure of social values: A computerized procedure for assessing individual differences in information processing and social value orientation. European Journal of Personality, 2, 217-230.
17. Liebrand, W. B. G., Wilke, H. A. M., Vogel, R., & Wolters, F. J. M. (1986b). Value orientation and conformity: A study using three types of social dilemma games. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 30, 77-97.
18. Luce, R. D., & Raffia, H. (1957). Games and decisions. New York: John Wiley.
19. McClintock, C. G. (1978). Social values: Their definition, measurement and development. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12, 121-137.
20. McClintock, C. G., & Allison, S. T. (1989). Social value orientation and helping behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 353-363.
21. McClintock, C. G., & Liebrand, W. B. G. (1988). Role of interdependence structure, individual value orientation, and another's strategy in social decision making: A transformational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 396-409.
22. McClintock, C. G., & McNeel, S. P. (1967). Prior dyadic experience and monetary reward as determinants of cooperative and competitive game behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 282-294.
23. Messick, D. M., & McClintock, C. G. (1968). Motivational basis of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1-25.
24. Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
25. Parks, C. D. (1994). The predictive ability of social values in resource dilemmas and public goods games. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 431-438.
26. Rapoport, A., & Guyer, M. A. (1966). A taxonomy of 2 × 2 games. General Systems, 11, 203-214.
27. Rosenberg, S., & Sedlak, A. (1972). Structural representations of implicit personality theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 235-297). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
28. Ross, L., Green, D., & House, P. (1977). The false consensus phenomenon: An attributional bias in self-perception and social-perception processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279-301.
29. Sattler, D. N., & Kerr, N. L. (1991). Might versus morality explained: Motivational and cognitive bases for social motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 756-765.
30. Schneider, D. J. (1973). Implicit personality theory: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 294-309.
31. Sheldon, K. M. (1999). Learning the lessons of tit-for-tat: Even competitors can get the message. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1245-1253.
32. Van Lange, P. A. M. (1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 337-349.
33. Van Lange, P. A. M., Agnew, C. R., Harinck, F., & Steemers, G. E. M. (1997). From game theory to real life: How social value orientation affects willingness to sacrifice in ongoing close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1330-1344.
34. Van Lange, P. A. M., & Kuhlman, D. M. (1994). Social value orientations and impressions of partner's honesty and intelligence: A test of the might versus morality effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 126-141.
35. Van Lange, P. A. M., & Liebrand, W. B. G. (1989). On perceiving morality and potency: Social values and the effects of person perception in a give-some dilemma. European Journal of Personality, 3, 209-225.
36. Van Lange, P. A. M., & Liebrand, W. B. G. (1991a). Social value orientation and intelligence: A test of the goal prescribes rationality principle. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 273-292.
37. Van Lange, P. A. M., & Liebrand, W. B. G. (1991b). The influence of other's morality and own social value orientation on cooperation in the Netherlands and the U.S.A. International Journal of Psychology, 26, 429-449.
38. Van Lange, P. A. M., Liebrand, W. B. G., & Kuhlman, D. M. (1990). Causal attribution of choice behavior in three N-person prisoner's dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 34-48.
39. Van Vugt, M., & Meertens, R. M., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (1995). Car versus public transportation? The role of social value orientations in a real-life social dilemma. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 258-278.