Eco-architecture analysis for end-of-life decision making

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 47, Issue 22, 2009, Pages 6233-6259

  Kwak, Min Jung ^a   Hong, Yoo Suk ^a   Cho, Nam Wook ^b  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University of Science and Technology   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Design for disassembly; Eco architecture; End of life decision making; End of life module

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURE ANALYSIS; ARCHITECTURE DESIGNS; DECISION MAKING PROCESS; DESIGN APPROACHES; DESIGN FOR DISASSEMBLY; ECO-ARCHITECTURE; END-OF-LIFE; END-OF-LIFE DECISION MAKING; END-OF-LIFE MODULE; NOVEL CONCEPT; PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE; RECYCLING CAPABILITY;

DESIGN; RECYCLING;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 70449597999     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207540802175329     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Chen, R.W., Navin-Chandra, D., and Prinz, F.B., 1994. A cost-benefit analysis model of product design for recyclability and its application. IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology, Part A, 17 (4), 502-507.
2. Das, S., Yedlarajiah, P., and Narendra, R., 2000. An approach for estimating the EOL product disassembly effort and cost. International Journal of Production Research, 38 (3), 657-673.
3. Das, S. and Naik, S., 2001. The DBOM standard: a specification for efficient product data transfer between manufacturers and demanufacturers. In: Proceedings of 2001 IEEE international symposium on electronics and the environment, 7-9 May 2001. Denver, USA, 241-246
4. Das, S. and Naik, S., 2002. Process planning for product disassembly. International Journal of Production Research, 40 (6), 1335-1355.
5. Dong, J. and Arndt, G., 2003. A review of current research on disassembly sequence generation and computer-aided design for disassembly. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 217 (3), 299-312.
6. Dowie, T. and Kelly, P., 1994. Estimation of disassembly times. Technical report DDR/TR15. Manchester Metropolitan University, UK.
7. Duverlie, P. and Castelain, J.M., 1999. Cost estimation during design step: parametric method versus case based reasoning method. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 15 (12), 895-906.
8. Eggert, R.J., 2005. Engineering design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
9. Erdos, G., Kis, T., and Xirouchakis, P., 2001. Modelling and evaluating product EOL options. International Journal of Production Research, 39 (6), 1203-1220.
10. Feldmann, K., et al., 2001. Computer-based product structure analysis for technical goods regarding optimal end-of-life strategies. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 215 (5), 683-693.
11. Fixson, S.K., 2004. Assessing product architecture costing: product life cycles, allocation rules, and cost models. In: Proceedings of ASME 2004 design engineering technical conferences, 28 September-2 October 2004. Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, DETC 2004-57458.
12. Gonzalez, B. and Adenso-Diaz, B., 2005. A bill of materials-based approach for EOL decision making in design for the environment. International Journal of Production Research, 43 (10), 2071-2099.
13. Gu, P. and Sosale, S., 1999. Product modularization for life cycle engineering. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 15 (5), 387-401.
14. Hundal, M.S., 2002. Mechanical life cycle handbook. New York: Marcel Dekker.
15. Ishii, K., Eubanks, C.H., and Di Marco, P., 1994. Design for product retirement and material life-cycle. Materials and Design, 15 (4), 225-233.
16. Johnson, M.R. and Wang, M.H., 1995. Planning product disassembly for material recovery opportunities. International Journal of Production Research, 33 (11), 3119-3142.
17. Krikke, H.R., van Harten, A., and Schuur, P.C., 1998. On a medium term product recovery and disposal strategy for durable assembly products. International Journal of Production Research, 36 (1), 111-140.
18. Kroll, E. and Carver, B.S., 1999. Disassembly analysis through time estimation and other metrics. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 15 (3), 191-200.
19. Kuo, T.C., Zhang, H.C., and Huang, S.H., 2000. Disassembly analysis for electromechanical products: a graph-based heuristic approach. International Journal of Production Research, 38 (5), 993-1007.
20. Kutz, M., 2007. Environmentally conscious mechanical design. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
21. Lambert, A.J.D., 1999. Linear programming in disassembly/clustering sequence generation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 36 (4), 723-738.
22. Lambert, A.J.D., 2002. Determining optimum disassembly sequences in electronic equipment. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 43 (3), 553-575.
23. Lambert, A.J.D. and Gupta, S.M., 2005. Disassembly modeling for assembly, maintenance, reuse, and recycling. New York: CRC Press.
24. Lee, B.H. and Ishii, K., 1997. Demanufacturing complexity metrics in design for recyclability. In: Proceedings of 1997 IEEE international symposium on electronics and the environment, 5-7 May 1997. San Francisco, USA, 19-24.
25. Lee, D.-H., Kang, J.-G., and Xirouchakis, P., 2001a. Disassembly planning and scheduling: review and further research. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B Journal of engineering manufacture, 215 (5), 695-710.
26. Lee, S.G., Lye, S.W., and Khoo, M.K., 2001b. A multi-objective methodology for evaluating product EOL options and disassembly. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 18 (2), 148-156.
27. Marks, M.D., Eubanks, C.F., and Ishii, K., 1993. Life-cycle clumping of product designs for ownership and retirement. In: Proceedings of the ASME design theory and methodology, 27-30 September 1993. Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, 83-90.
28. Mat Saman, M.Z., et al., 2005. Methodology for the design recyclability assessment in automotive engineering. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on design and manufacture for sustainable development, 12 July 2005. Newcastle, UK.
29. Murayama, T., Kagawa, K., and Oba, F., 1999. Computer-aided redesign for improving recyclability. In: Proceedings of 1st international symposium on environmentally conscious design and inverse manufacturing, 1-3 February 1999. Tokyo, Japan, 746-751.
30. Ong, N.S. and Wong, Y.C., 1999. Automatic subassembly detection from a product model for disassembly sequence generation. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 15 (4), 425-431.
31. O'Shea, B., Kaebernick, H., and Grewal, S.S., 2000. Using a cluster graph representation of products for application in the disassembly planning. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Application, 8 (3), 158-170.
32. Pnueli, Y. and Zussman, E., 1997. Evaluating the EOL value of a product and improving it by redesign. International Journal of Production Research, 35 (4), 921-942.
33. Qian, X. and Zhang, H.C., 2003. Design for environment: an environmental analysis model for the modular design of products. In: Proceedings of 2003 IEEE international symposium on electronics and the environment, 19-22 May 2003. Boston, USA, 114-119.
34. Sand, J.C., Gu, P., and Watson, G., 2002. HOME: house of modular enhancement-a tool for modular product redesign. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 10 (2), 153-164.
35. Seo, K.K., et al., 2002. Approximate estimation of the product life cycle cost using artificial neural networks in conceptual design. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 19 (6), 461-471.
36. Sodhi, R., Sonnenberg, M., and Das, S., 2004. Evaluating the unfastening effort in design for disassembly and serviceability. Journal of Engineering Design, 15 (1), 69-90.
37. Suzuki, T., Kanehara, T., Inaba, A. and Okuma, S., 1993. On algebraic and graph structural properties of assembly petri net. In: Proceedings of 1993 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, 2-6 May 1993. Atlanta, USA, 507-514.
38. Takeuchi, S. and Saitou, K., 2005. Design for product-embedded disassembly. In: Proceedings of ASME 2005 international design engineering technical conferences, 24-28 September 2005. Long Beach, USA, DETC 2005-85260.
39. Ulrich, K., 1995. The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy, 24 (3), 419-440.
40. Ulrich, K.T. and Eppinger, S.D., 2003. Product design and development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
41. Veerakamolmal, P. and Gupta, S.M., 1999. Analysis of design efficiency for the disassembly of modular electronic products. Journal of Electronics Manufacturing, 9 (1), 79-95.
42. Zhang, Y. and Gershenson, J.K., 2002. Questioning the direct relationship between product modularity and retirement cost. The Journal of Sustainable Product Design, 2 (1-2), 53-68.