The nature of relationships among the components of pedagogical content knowledge of preservice science teachers: 'Ozone layer depletion' as an example

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 961-988

  Kaya, Osman N ^a  

^a FIRAT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449557004     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500690801911326     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Abraham, M.R., Cracolice, M.S., Graves, A.P., Aladamash, A.H., Kihega, J.G., Palma Gil, J.G., et al. (1997). The nature and state of general chemistry laboratory courses offered by colleges and universities in the United States. Journal of Chemical Education, 74, 591-594.
2. Barnett, J., & Hodson, D. (2001). Pedagogical context knowledge: Toward a fuller understanding of what good science teachers know. Science Education, 85, 426-453.
3. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33, 3-15.
4. Boyes, E., Chamber, W., & Stanisstreet, M. (1995). Trainee primary teachers' ideas about the ozone layer. Environmental Education Research, 1, 133-145
5. Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (1994). The Ideas of secondary school children concerning ozone layer damage. Global Environmental Change, 4, 317-330.
6. Cochran, K.R., Deruiter, J.A., & King, R.A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44, 263-270.
7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. De Jong, O. (2000). The teacher trainer as researcher: Exploring the initial pedagogical content concerns of prospective science teachers. European Journal of Teacher Education, 23, 127-137
9. De Jong, O., & Van Driel, J. (2004). Exploring the development of student teachers' PCK of the multiple meanings of chemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, 477-491
10. De Jong, O., Van Driel, J., & Verloop, N. (2005). Preservice teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of using particle models when teaching chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 947-964.
11. Dove, J. (1996). Student teacher understanding of the greenhouse effect, ozone layer depletion and acid rain. Environmental Education Research, 2, 89-100.
12. Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N.G. (1999). Examining pedagogical content knowledge. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
13. Grandy, R., & Duschl, R. (2005). Reconsidering the character and role of inquiry in school science: Framing the debates. NSF Inquiry Conference Proceedings. Retrieved October 23, 2006, from http://www.ruf.rice.edu/rgrandy/NSFConSched.html.
14. Grossman, P.L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York & London: Teachers College Press.
15. Halim, L., & Meerah, S.M. (2002). Science trainee teachers' pedagogical content knowledge and its influence on physics teaching. Research in Science and Technological Education, 20, 215-225.
16. Khalid, T. (2003). Pre-service high school teachers' perceptions of three environmental phenomena. Environmental Education Research, 9, 35-50.
17. Lederman, N.G., & Gess-Newsome, J. (1992). Do subject matter knowledge, and pedagogical content knowledge constitute the ideal gas law of science teaching? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 3, 16-20.
18. Lederman, N.G., Gess-Newsome, J., & Latz, M.S. (1994). The nature and development of preservice science teachers' conceptions of subject matter and pedagogy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 129-146.
19. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95-132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
20. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
21. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge Growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.
22. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
23. Shulman L.S., & Grossman, P.L. (1988). Knowledge growth in teaching: A final report to the Spencer Foundation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
24. Tobin, K., Tippins, D., & Gallard, A. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In D.L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 45-93). New York: Macmillan.
25. Turkish Higher Educational Council. (2006). Turkish science teacher education. Retrieved August 23, 2006, from http://www.yok.gov.tr/egitim/ogretmen/fen_bilgisi.doc
26. Turkish Ministry of National Education (2005). New curriculum of science and technology education. Retrieved December 24, 2005, from http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/ogretmen/
27. Van Driel, J., De Jong, O., & Verloop, N. (2002). The development of pre-service chemistry teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 86, 572-590
28. Van Driel, J.H., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 673-695.
29. Vazquez-Alonso, A., & Manassero-Mas, M.-A. (1999). Response and scoring models for the 'Views on Science-Technology-Society' instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 231-247.
30. Wiggins, G. (1996). Practicing what we preach in designing authentic assessments. Educational Leadership, 54, 18-25.
31. Yager, R.E. (2000). The constructivist learning model. The Science Teacher, 67, 44-45.
32. Zoller, U., Ben-Chaim, D., & Kamm, S.D. (1997). Examination type preferences of college science students and their faculty in Israel and USA: A comparative study. School Science and Mathematics, 97, 3-12.