A structured model for the simulation of bioreactors under transient conditions

AIChE Journal

Volumn 55, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 2973-2984

  Morchain, Jérôme ^a   Fonade, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

Author keywords

Bioreactor; Dynamic; Simulation; Structured model; Transport

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL PROCESS; BIOLOGICAL VARIABLES; BIOREACTIONS; CONTINUOUS CULTURE; REACTOR SIZES; SCALE-UP; SIMULATION; SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY; STRUCTURED MODEL; SUBSTRATE UPTAKE; TIME CONSTANTS; TRANSIENT BEHAVIOR; TRANSIENT CONDITIONS; TRANSPORT; UNSTRUCTURED MODEL;

BIOCONVERSION; BIOREACTORS; SUBSTRATES;

SIMULATORS;

EID: 70350635761     PISSN: 00011541     EISSN: 15475905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/aic.11906     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Vrábel P, Van Der Lans RGJM, Van Der Schot FN, Luyben KCAM, Xu B, Enfors S-O. CMA: integration of fluid dynamics and microbial kinetics in modeling of large-scale fermentations. Chem Eng J. 2001;84:463-474.
2. Bezzo F, Macchietto S, Pantelides CC. General hybrid multizonal/ CFD approach for bioreactor modeling. AIChE J. 2003;49:2133-2148.
3. Hristov HV, Mann R, Lossev V, Vlaev SD. A simplified CFD for three-dimensional analysis of fluid mixing, Mass Transfer and Bioreaction in a Fermenter Equipped with Triple Novel Geometry Impellers. Food Bioproducts Process. 2004;82:21-34.
4. Schmalzriedt S, Jenne M, Mauch K, Reuss M. Integration of physiology and fluid dynamics. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2003;80: 19-68.
5. Neubauer P, Häggström L, Enfors S-O. Influence of substrate oscillations on acetate formation and growth yield in Escherichia coli glucose limited fed-batch cultivations. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1995;47: 139-146.
6. Larsson G, Törnkvist M, Wernersson ES, Trägardh C, Noorman H, Enfors S-O. Substrate gradients in bioreactors: origin and consequences. Bioprocess Eng. 1996;14:281-289.
7. Delvigne F, Destain J, Thonart P. Bioreactor hydrodynamic effect on Escherichia coli physiology: experimental results and stochastic simulations. Bioprocess Biosystems Eng. 2005;28:131-137.
8. Lapin A, Schmid J, Reuss M. Modeling the dynamics of E. coli populations in the three-dimensional turbulent field of a stirred-tank bioreactor-a structured-segregated approach. Chem Eng Sci. 2006;61: 4783-4797.
9. Delafosse A. Analyse et étude numérique des effets de mélange dans un bioréacteur, PhD Thesis, 2008, Institut National des Sciences Appliquées, Toulouse.
10. Enfors SO, Jahic M, Rozkov A, Xu B, Hecker M, Jürgen B, Krüger E, Schweder T, Hamer G, O'Beirne D, Noisommit-Rizzi N, Reuss M, Boone L, Hewitt C, McFarlane C, Nienow A, Kovacs T, Trägårdh C, Fuchs L, Revstedt J, Friberg PC, Hjertager B, Blomsten G, Skogman H, Hjort S, Hoeks F, Lin HY, Neubauer P, Van Der Lans R, Luyben K, Vrabel P, Manelius Å. Physiological responses to mixing in large scale bioreactors. J Biotechnol. 2001;85:175-185.
11. Young TB, Bruley DF, Bungay I. A dynamic mathematical model of the chemostat. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1970;12:747-769.
12. Ataai MM, Shuler ML. Simulation of CFSTR through development of a mathematical model for anaerobic growth of Escherichia coli cell population. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1985;27:1051-1055.
13. Nielsen J, Villadsen J. Modelling of microbial kinetics. Chem Eng Sci. 1992;47(17-18):4225-4270.
14. Patarinska T, Dochain D, Agathos SN, Ganovski L. Modelling of continuous microbial cultivation taking into account memory effects. Bioprocess Eng. 2000;22:517-527.
15. Ajbar A, Fakeeha AH. Static and dynamic behavior of a class of unstructured models of continuous bioreactors with growth associated product. Bioprocess Eng. 2002;25:21-27.
16. Wirtz KW. A generic model for changes in microbial kinetic coefficients. J Biotechnol. 2002;97:147-162.
17. Vanrolleghem PA, Sin G, Gernaey KV. Transient response of aerobic and anoxic activated sludge activities to sudden substrate concentration changes. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004;86:277-290.
18. Perret J. A new kinetic model of growing bacteria population. J General Microbiol. 1960;2:589-617.
19. Sin G, Guisasola A, Pauw DJWD, Baeza JA, Carrera J, Vanrolleghem PA. A new approach for modelling simultaneous storage and growth processes for activated sludge systems under aerobic conditions. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005;92:600-613.
20. Leegwater MPM, Neijssel OM, Tempest DW. Apects of microbial physiology in relation to process control. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 1982;32:92-99.
21. Chiam HF, Harris IJ. Application of a noninhibitory growth model to predict the transient response in a chemostat. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1983;25:1613-1623.
22. Sonnleitner B, Rothen SA, Kuriyama H. Dynamics of glucose consumption in yeast. Biotechnol Prog. 1997;13:8-13.
23. Ramkrishna D. On modeling of bioreactors for control. J Process Control. 2003;13:581-589.
24. Llaneras F, Picó J. Stoichiometric modelling of cell metabolism. J Biosci Bioeng. 2008;105:1-11.
25. Ramkrishna D, Mahoney AW. Population balance modeling. Promise for the future. Chem Eng Sci. 2002;57:595-606.
26. Varner J, Ramkrishna D. Mathematical models of metabolic pathways. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1999;10:146-150.
27. Fredrickson AG. Population balance equations for cell and microbial cultures revisited. AIChE J. 2003;49:1050-1059.
28. Tartakovsky B, Sheintuch M, Hilmer J-M, Scheper T. Modelling of E.coli fermentations: comparison of multicompartment and variable structure models. Bioprocess Eng. 1997;16:323-329.
29. Bailey JE, Ollis DF. Biochemical Engineering Fundamentals. Singapore: Mc-Graw Hill Book Company, 1986.
30. Rizzi M, Baltes M, Theobald U, Reuss M. In vivo analysis of metabolic dynamics in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. II. Mathematical model. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1997;55:592-608. (Pubitemid 27318173)
31. Zeng RJ, Loosdrecht MCMV, Yuan Z, Keller J. Metabolic model for glycogen-accumulating organisms in anaerobic/aerobic activated sludge systems. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2003;81:92-105. (Pubitemid 38181642)
32. Xu B, Jahic M, Enfors SO. Modeling of overflow metabolism in batch and fed-batch cultures of Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Prog. 1999;15:81-90.
33. Wiechert W. Modeling and simulation: tools for metabolic engineering. J Biotechnol. 2002;94:37-63.
34. Chassagnole C, Noisommit-Rizzi N, Schmid JW, Mauch K, Reuss M. Dynamic modeling of the central carbon metabolism of Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2002;79:53-73.
35. Alvarez-Vasquez F, Sims KJ, Hannun YA, Voit EO. Integration of kinetic information on yeast sphingolipid metabolism in dynamical pathway models. J Theor Biol. 2004;226:265-291.
36. Heijnen JJ. Approximative kinetic formats used in metabolic network modeling. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005;91:534-545.
37. Young JD, Henne KL, Morgan JA, Konopka AE, Ramkrishna D. Integrating cybernetic modeling with pathway analysis provides a dynamic, systems-level description of metabolic control. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008;100:542-559.
38. Goelzer A, Bekkal-Brikci F, Martin-Verstraet I, Noirot P, Bessieres P, Aymerich S, Fromion V. Reconstruction and analysis of the genetic and metabolic regulatory networks of the central metabolism of Bacillus subtilis. BMC Systems Biology. 2008;2:20.
39. Chung JD, Stephanopoulos G. On physiological multiplicity and population heterogeneity of biological systems. Chem Eng Sci. 1996;51:1509-1521.
40. Mantzaris NV, Daoutidis P. Cell population balance modeling and control in continuous bioreactors. J Process Control. 2004;14:775-784.
41. Henson MA. Dynamic modeling of microbial cell populations. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2003;14:460-467.
42. Henson MA. Dynamic modeling and control of yeast cell populations in continuous biochemical reactors. Comput Chem Eng. 2003; 27(8-9):1185-1199.
43. Henson MA. Cell ensemble modeling of metabolic oscillations in continuous yeast cultures. Comput Chem Eng. 2005;29:645-661.
44. Ramkrishna D. Toward a self-similar theory of microbial populations. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1994;43:138-148.
45. Mantzaris NV, Liou J-J, Daoutidis P, Srienc F. Numerical solution of a mass structured cell population balance model in an environment of changing substrate concentration. J Biotechnol. 1999;71(1-3):157-174.
46. Kätterer L, Allemann H, Käppeli O, Fiechter A. Transient responses of continuously growing yeast cultures to dilution rate shifts: a sensitive means to analyze biology and the performance of equipment. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1986;28:146-150.
47. O'Neil DG, Lyberatos G. Dynamic model development for a continuous culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1990;36:437-445.
48. Merchuk JC, Asenjo JA. The Monod equation and mass transfer. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1995;45:91-94.
49. Zafiri C, Kornaros M, Lyberatos G. Kinetic modelling of biological phosphorus removal with a pure culture of Acinetobacter sp. under aerobic, anaerobic and transient operating conditions. Water Res. 1999;33:2769-2788.
50. Storer FF, Gaudy AF. Computational analysis of transient response to quantitative shock loadings of heterogeneous populations in continuous culture. Environ Sci Technol. 1969;3:143-149.
51. Gaudy AF, Gaudy ET. Responses to changes in the environment. In: Microbiology for the Environmental Scientists and Engineers. New York: Mc Graw-Hill, 1980:618-634.
52. Ferenci T. Regulation by nutrient limitation. Curr Opin Microbiol. 1999;2:208-213.
53. Ferenci T. 'Growth of bacterial cultures' 50 years on: toward an uncertainty principle instead of constants in bacterial growth kinetics. Res Microbiol. 1999;150:431-438.
54. Lin HL, Neubauer P. Influence of controled glucose oscillations on a fed-batch process of reocombinant Escherichia coli. J Biotechnol. 2000;79:27-37.
55. Natarajan A, Srienc F. Dynamics of glucose uptake by single Escherichia coli cells. Metab Eng. 1999;1:320-333.
56. Natarajan A, Srienc F. Glucose uptake rates of single E. coli cells grown in glucose-limited chemostat cultures. J Microbiol Methods. 2000;42:87-96.
57. Ferenci T. Adaptation to life at micromolar nutrient levels: the regulation of Escherichia coli glucose transport by endoinduction and cAMP. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1996;18:301-317.
58. Lin HY, Mathiszik B, Xu B, Enfors SO, Neubauer P. Determination of the maximum specific uptake capacities for glucose and oxygen in glucose-limited fed-batch cultivations of Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2001;73:347-357.
59. Lapin A, Muller D, Reuss M. Dynamic behavior of microbial populations in stirred bioreactors simulated with euler-lagrange methods: traveling along the lifelines of single cells. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2004;43:4647-4656.