Community integration: Conceptualisation and measurement

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 31, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 761-771

  Yasui, Naoko Yura ^a   Berven, Norman L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Community integration; Measurement; Models of disability

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY REINTEGRATION; CULTURAL FACTOR; DISABILITY; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; INDEPENDENCE; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MENTAL DISEASE; NOTE; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOCIAL STATUS; THEORETICAL MODEL; VALIDATION PROCESS; DEMOGRAPHY; DISABLED PERSON; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REVIEW; SOCIAL ADAPTATION; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

DISABLED PERSONS; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 70350464912     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638280802306638     Document Type: Note

References (52)

1. Carling PJ. Return to community: Building support systems for people with psychiatric disabilities. New York: Guilford; 1995.
2. Gordon WA, Brown M, Bergman AI, Shields RW. Community integration research: An empowerment paradigm. In: Hagglund KJ, Heinemann AW, editors. Handbook of applied disability and rehabilitation research. New York: Springer; 2006. pp 5-23.
3. Kosciulek JF, Merz M. Structural analysis of the consumerdirected theory of empowerment. Rehabil Couns Bull 2001;44:209-216.
4. McColl MA, Carlson P, Johnston J, Minnes P, Shue K, Davis D, Karlovits T. The definition of community integration: Perspectives of people with brain injuries. Brain Inj 1998;12:15-30.
5. Wong Y-LI, Solomon PL. Community integration of persons with psychiatric disabilities in supportive independent housing: A conceptual model and methodological considerations. Ment Health Serv Res 2002;4:13-28.
6. Ware NC, Hopper K, Tugenbergm T, Dickey B, Fisher D. Connectedness and citizenship: Redefining social integration. Psychiatr Serv 2007;58:469-474.
7. Wood-Dauphinee S, Opzoomer A, Williams JI, Marchand B, Spitzer WO. Assessment of global function: The reintegration to normal living index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988;69:583-590.
8. Spitzer WO, Dobson AJ, Hall J, Chesterman E, Levi J, Shepherd R, Battista RN, Catchlove BR. Measuring quality of life of cancer patients: Concise QL-Index for use by physicians. J Chronic Dis 1981;34:585-597.
9. Tooth LR, McKenna KT, SmithM, O'Rourke PK. Reliability of scores between stroke patients and significant others on the reintegration to normal living (RNL) index. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:433-440.
10. Willer B, Rosenthal M, Kreutzer JS, Gordon WA, Rempel R. Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1993;8:75-87.
11. Willer B, Ottenbacher KJ, Coad ML. The community integration questionnaire: A comprehensive examination. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1994;73:103-111.
12. Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA, Overholser JD, Richardson GN. Quantifying handicap: A new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73:519-526.
13. Corrigan JD, Deming R. Psychometric characteristics of the community integration questionnaire: Replication and extension. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1995;10:41-53.
14. Rintala DH, Novy DM, Garza HM, Young ME, HighWMJr, Chiou-Tan FY. Psychometric properties of a Spanishlanguage version of the community integration questionnaire (CIQ). Rehabil Psychol 2002;47:144-164.
15. Dijkers M. Measuring the long-term outcomes of traumatic brain injury: A review of the community integration questionnaire. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1997;12:74-91.
16. McCollMA, Davies D, Carlson P, Johnston J, Minnes P. The community integration measure: Development and preliminary validation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:429-434.
17. Kaplan CP. The community integration questionnaire with new scoring guidelines: Concurrent validity and need for appropriate norms. Brain Inj 2001;15:725-731.
18. Cicerone KD, Mott T, Azulay J, Friel JC. Community integration and satisfaction with functioning after intensive rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:943-950.
19. Berry JW. An ecological perspective on cultural and ethnic psychology. In: Trickett EJ, Watts RJ, Birman D, editors. Human diversity: Perspectives on people in context. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1993. pp 115-141.
20. Buell MK, Minnes P. An acculturation perspective on deinstitutionalization, normalization and service delivery. J Dev Disabil 1994;3:94-107.
21. Minnes P, Buell K, Feldman MA, McColl MA, McCreary B. Community integration as acculturation: Preliminary validation of the AIMS Interview. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil 2002;15:377-387.
22. Minnes P, Buell K, Nolte ML, McColl MA, Carlson P, Johnston J. Defining community integration of persons with brain injuries as acculturation: A Canadian perspective. NeuroRehabil 2001;16:3-10.
23. Minnes P, Carlson P, McColl MA, Nolte ML, Johnston J, Buell K. Community integration: A useful construct, but what does it really mean? Brain Inj 2003;17:149-159.
24. Buell MK. Integration as acculturation: Developmental disability, deinstitutionalization, and service delivery implications. Int Rev Res Ment Retard 2003;26:221-260.
25. Flynn RJ, Aubry TD. Integration of persons with developmental or psychiatric disabilities: Conceptualisation and measurements. In: Flynn RJ, Lemay RA, editors. A quartercentury of normalization and social role valorization: Evolution and impact. Ottawa, ON: University of Ottawa Press; 1999. pp 271-303.
26. Wolfensberger W, Tullman S. A brief outline of the principle of normalization. Rehabil Psychol 1982;27:131-145.
27. Wolfensberger W, Thomas S. PASSING (Program Analysis of Service Systems' Implementation of Normalization Goals): Normalization criteria and ratings manual. 2nd ed. Toronto, ON: National Institute on Mental Retardation; 1983.
28. Flynn RJ. A comprehensive review of research conducted with the program evaluation instruments PASS and PASSING. In: Flynn RJ, Lemay RA, editors. A quarter-century of normalization and social role valorization: Evolution and impact. Ottawa, ON: University of Ottawa Press; 1999. pp 317-349.
29. US Department of Education. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR) long range plan for fiscal years 1999-2003. Electronic Citation. http://www. ncddr.org/new/announcements/nidrr-lrp/index. html. Last accessed March 2005.
30. Trigg R, Wood VA, Langton Hewer R. Social reintegration after stroke: The first stages in the development of the subjective index of physical and social outcome (SIPSO). Clin Rehabil 1999;13:341-353.
31. Trigg R, Wood VA. The subjective index of physical and social outcome (SIPSO): A new measure for use with stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 2000;14:288-299.
32. Trigg R, Wood VA. The validation of the subjective index of physical and social outcome (SIPSO). Clin Rehabil 2003;17:283-289.
33. Sneeuw KC, Aaronson NK, de Haan RJ, Limburg M. Assessing quality of life after stroke: The value and limitations of proxy ratings. Stroke 1997;28:1541-1549.
34. Brown M, Dijkers MPJM, Gordon WA, Ashman T, Charatz H, Cheng Z. Participation objective, participation subjective: A measure of participation combining outside and insider perspectives. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2004;19:459-481.
35. World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and heath, ICF. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2001.
36. Cohen S, Underwood LG, Gottlieb BH. Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.
37. Brissette I, Cohen S, Seeman TE. Measuring social integration and social networks. In: Cohen S, Underwood LG, Gottlieb BH, editors. Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. pp 53-85.
38. Cohen S. Social supports and physical health: Symptoms, health behaviors, and infectious disease. In: Greene AL, Cummings EM, Karraker KH, editors. Life-span perspectives on stress and coping. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1991. pp 213-234.
39. House JS, Robbins C, Metzner HL. The association of social relationships and activities with mortality: Prospective evidence from the Techumseh community health study. Am J Epidemiol 1982;116:123-140.
40. Heinemann AW. Putting outcome measurement in context: A rehabilitation psychology perspective. Rehabil Psychol 2005;50:6-14.
41. Hanson BS, Isacsson SO, Janzon L, Lindell S-E, Rastam L. Social anchorage and blood pressure in elderly men. J Hypertens 1988;5:503-510.
42. Hanson BS, Isacsson SO, Janzon L, Lindell S-E. Social network and social support influence mortality in elderly men: Prospective population study of men born in Malmö, Sweden. Am J Epidemiol 1989;130:100-111.
43. Buckner JC. The development of an instrument to measure neighborhood cohesion. Am J Community Psychol 1988;16:771-791.
44. Perkins DD, Florin P, Rich RC, Wandersman A, Chavis DM. Participation and the social and physical environment of residential blocks: Crime and community context. Am J Community Psychol 1990;18:83-115.
45. Pledger C, editor. A new model of disability [Special section]. Am Psychol 2003;58:279-312.
46. Tate DG, Pledger C. An integrative conceptual framework of disability: New directions for research. Am Psychol 2003;58:289-295.
47. Tate DG. Hospital to community: Changes in practice and outcomes. Rehabil Psychol 2001;46:125-138.
48. Olkin R, Pledger C. Can disability studies and psychology join hands? Am Psychol 2003;58:296-304.
49. Zimmerman MA, Warschausky S. Empowerment theory for rehabilitation research: Conceptual and methodological issuers. Rehabil Psychol 1998;43:3-16.
50. DeJong G. Independent living: From social movement to analytic paradigm. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1979;60:435-446.
51. Shinn M, Toohey SM. Community contexts of human welfare. Annu Rev Psychol 2003;54:427-459.
52. Perkins R, Repper J. Working alongside people with long term mental health problems. London: Chapman & Hall; 1996.