Community integration: A useful construct, but what does it really mean?

Brain Injury

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 149-159

  Minnes, Patricia ^a   Carlson, Peter ^b   McColl, Mary Ann ^a   Nolte, Mary Lou ^a   Johnston, Jane ^b   Buell, Katherine ^a,c  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b Reg Community Brain Injury Services   (Canada)

^c Department of Psychology ^*  (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMNESIA; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMMUNITY CARE; CONSCIOUSNESS DISORDER; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTEGRATION; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PERCEPTION; POSTTRAUMATIC COMPLICATION; PREVALENCE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; SCORING SYSTEM; SOCIAL INTERACTION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 0037318627     PISSN: 02699052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02699050301828     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Hall, K.M.: Establishing a national traumatic brain injury information system based upon a unified data set. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78: 5-11, 1997.
2. Willer, B., Rosenthal, M., Kreutzer, J. S. et al.: Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8: 75-87, 1993.
3. McColl, M.A., Carlson, P., Johnston, J. et al.: The definition of community integration: Perspectives of people with brain injuries. Brain Injury, 12: 15-30, 1998.
4. McColl, M.A., Davies, D., Carlson, P. et al.: The Community Integration Measure: Development and preliminary validation. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 82: 429-434, 2001.
5. Nolte, M. L.: 1999, Disablement, context and quality of life after brain injury: Measuring what matters. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
6. Buell, M. K. and Minnes, P.: An acculturation perspective on deinstitutionalization, normalization and service delivery. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 3: 94-107, 1994.
7. Minnes, P. M., Buell, M. K., Feldman, M. et al.: The Community Integration Questionnaire - Revised. Report to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, 1997.
8. Minnes, P. M., Buell, M. K., Nolte, M. L. et al.: Defining community integration of persons with brain injuries as acculturation: A Canadian perspective. NeuroRehabilitation, 16: 3-10, 2001.
9. Berry, J. W.: An ecological perspective on cultural and ethnic psychology. In: E. Trickett (editor) Human Diversity: Perspective on People in Context (New York: Jossey-Bass), 116-141, 1994.
10. Berry, J. W.,Kim, U., Power, S. et al.: Acculturation attitudes in plural societies. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 38: 185-206, 1989.
11. Condeluci, A.: Interdependence: The Route to Community (Winter Park, Florida: PMD Publishers), 1991.
12. Kay, T., Cavallo, M. M., Exrachi, O. et al.: Head Injury Family Interview: A clinical and research tool. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 10: 12-31, 1995.
13. Heinemann, A. W. and Whiteneck, G.: Relationships among impairment, disability, handicap and life satisfaction in persons with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 10: 54-63, 1995.
14. Whiteneck, G.: Measuring what matters: Key rehabilitation outcomes. Archives Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75: 1073-1076, 1994.
15. McGrew, K. S., Johnson. D. R. and Bruininks, R. H.: Factor analysis of community adjustment outcome measures for young adults with mild to severe disabilities. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 12: 55-66, 1994.