Structural analysis of the consumer-directed theory of empowerment

Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 209-216

  Kosciulek, John F ^a   Merz, MaryAnn ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MARYVILLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035592861     PISSN: 00343552     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/003435520104400403     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: America's perceptions of quality of life. New York: Plenum Press.
2. Arbuckle, J. L. (1997). AMOS User's Guide Version 3.6. Chicago: Smallwaters.
3. Baldwin, B. (1989). A primer in the use and interpretation of structural equation models. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 22, 115-127.
4. Banja, J. D., & DeJong, G. (2000). The rehabilitation marketplace: Economics, values, and proposals for reforms. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81, 233-240.
5. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Fit indexes, Lagrange multipliers, constraint changes, and incomplete data in structural models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 163-172.
6. Bentler, P. M., & Bonnett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
7. Bigelow, D. A., Gareau, M. J., & Young, D. J. (1992). A quality of life interview. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 14, 94-98.
8. Bogdan, R., & Taylor, S. J. (1987). Conclusion: The next wave. In S. J. Taylor, D. Biklen, & J. Knoll (Eds.), Community integration for people with severe disabilities (pp. 209-213). New York: Teachers College Press.
9. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equation models with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
10. Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (Eds.). (1993). Testing structural equation models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Bolton, B., & Brookings, J. (1996). Development of a multifaceted definition of empowerment. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 39, 256-264.
12. Bradley, W. J., & Schaefer, K. C. (1998). The uses and misuses of data and models: The mathematization of the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/ Windows. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Crown, W. H. (1998). Statistical models for the behavioral and social sciences. Westport, CT: Praeger.
15. Estes, W. K. (1993). Mathematical models in psychology. In G. Keren & C. Lewis (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences: Methodological issues (pp. 3-19). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Felce, D., & Perry, J. (1996). Exploring current conceptions of quality of life: A model for people with and without disabilities. In R. Renwick, I. Brown, & M. Nagler (Eds.), Quality of life in health promotion and rehabilitation (pp. 51-62). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Habeck, R. V., & Szymanski, E. M. (1999). Vocational rehabilitation strategies for the new world of work: Introduction to the special issue. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 42, 274-278.
18. Hahn, H. (1991). Alternative views of empowerment: Social services and civil rights. Journal of Rehabilitation, 57(4), 17-19.
19. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1993). New features in LISREL 8. Chicago: Scientific Software.
20. Kosciulek, J. F. (1999a). The Consumer-Directed Theory of Empowerment. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 42, 196-213.
21. Kosciulek, J. F. (1999b). Consumer direction in disability policy formulation and rehabilitation service delivery. Journal of Rehabilitation, 65(2), 4-9.
22. Kosciulek, J. F. (2000a). Implications of consumer direction for disability policy development and rehabilitation service delivery. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 11(2), 82-89.
23. Kosciulek, J. F. (2000b). The Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act (WIIA) of 1999: An opportunity for rehabilitation counselors. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 43, 1-2.
24. Lehman, A. F., Postrado, L. T, & Rachuba, L. (1993). Convergent validation of quality of life assessments for persons with severe mental illness. Quality of Life Research, 2, 327-333.
25. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (1986). The MIT dictionary of modern economics. Cambridge, MA: Author.
26. National Institute on Consumer-Directed Long-Term Services. (1996). Principles of consumer-directed home and community-based services. Washington, DC: Author.
27. O'Day, B. (1999, Spring-Summer). Policy barriers for people with disabilities who want to work. American Rehabilitation, 8-15.
28. Parent, W. (1993). Quality of life and consumer choice. In P. Wehman (Ed.), The ADA mandate for social change (pp. 19-33). Baltimore: Brookes.
29. Polit, D. F. (1996). Data analysis & statistics for nursing research. Stamford, CT: Appleton & Lange.
30. Rogers, E. S., Chamberlin, J., Ellison, M. L., & Crean, T. (1997). A consumer constructed scale to measure empowerment among users of mental health services. Psychiatric Services, 48, 1042-1047.
31. Seelman, K., & Sweeney, S. (1995, Autumn-Winter). The changing universe of disability. American Rehabilitation, 2-13.
32. Stein, J. (1997). Empowerment and women's health: Theory, methods, and practice. London: Zed Books.
33. Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
34. Taylor, S. J., Biklen, D., & Knoll, J. (1987). Community integration for people with severe disabilities. New York: Teachers College Press.
35. Willer, B. S., Ottenbacher, K. J., & Coad, M. L. (1994). The Community Integration Questionnaire: A comparative examination. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73, 103-111.
36. Willer, B. S., Rosenthal, M., Kreutzer, J. S., Gordon, W. A., & Rempel, R. (1993). Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8, 75-87.
37. Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 581-599.
38. Zimmerman, M. A., & Warschausky, S. (1998). Empowerment theory for rehabilitation research: Conceptual and methodological issues. Rehabilitation Psychology, 43, 3-16.