Teacher-based assessment for foreign language pragmatics

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 445-470

  Ishihara, Noriko ^a  

^a HOSEI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350364521     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00244.x     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Ableeva, R. (2007). Assessing listening for development. In R. Alanen & S. Poyhonen (Eds.), Language in action: Vygotsky and Leontievian legacy today (pp. 352-379). Newcastle upon Tyne, England: Cambridge Scholars.
2. Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Bailey, K. M. (1998). Learning about language assessment. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
4. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Mahan-Taylor, R. (Eds.). (2003). Teaching pragmatics. Washington DC: Office of English Programs, U.S. Department of State. Retrieved June 15, 2008, from http://exchanges.state.gov/education/engteaching/pragmatics.htm.
5. Birenbaum, M. (1996). Assessment 2000: Towards a pluralistic approach to assessment. In M. Birenbaum & F. J. R. C. Dochy (Eds.), Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning processes and prior knowledge (pp. 3-29). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
6. Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. New York: Longman.
7. Brown, H. D., & Hudson, T. (1998). The alternatives in language assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 653-675.
8. Brown, J. D. (2001). Pragmatics tests: Different purposes, different tests. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 301-325). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Canagarajah, A. S. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47.
11. Cohen, A. D. (2004). Assessing speech acts in a second language. In D. Boxer & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Studying speaking to inform second language learning (pp. 302-327). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
12. Crandall, E., & Basturkmen, H. (2004). Evaluating pragmatics-focused materials. ELT Journal, 58, 38-49.
13. Darling-Hammond, L. (1994). Performance-based assessment and educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 64, 5-30.
14. Enochs, K., & Yoshitake-Strain, S. (1999). Evaluating six measures of EFL learners' pragmatic competence. JALT Journal, 21, 29-50.
15. Eslami-Rasekh, Z. (2005). Raising the pragmatic awareness of language learners. ELT Journal, 59, 199-208.
16. Félix-Brasdefer, C. (2006). Teaching the negotiation of multi-turn speech acts: Using conversation-analytic tools to teach pragmatics in the FL classroom. In K. Bardovi-Harlig, C. Félix-Brasdefer, & A. Omar (Eds.), Pragmatics and language learning, Volume 11 (pp. 167-197). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i at Manoa, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
17. Fox, J. (2008). Alternative assessment. In E. Shohamy & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Vol. 7. Language testing and assessment (2nd ed.; pp. 97-108). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.
18. Garrett, P. B., & Baquedano-López, P. (2002). Language socialization: Reproduction and continuity, transformation and change. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 339-361.
19. Hartford, B. S., & Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1992). Experimental and observational data in the study of interlanguage pragmatics. Pragmatics and Language Learning, 3, 33-52.
20. Hill, B., Ide, S., Ikuta, S., Kawasaki, A., & Ogino, T. (1986). Universals of linguistic politeness: Quantitative evidence from Japanese and American English. Journal of Pragmatics, 10, 347-371.
21. Hinkel, E. (1997). Appropriateness of advice: DCT and multiple choice data. Applied Linguistics, 18, 1-26.
22. Hudson, T. (2001). Indicators for pragmatic instruction: Some quantitative tools. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics and language teaching (pp. 283-300). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Hudson, T., Detmer, E., & Brown, J. D. (1995). Developing prototypic measures of cross-cultural pragmatics. (Technical Report No. 7). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
24. Huerta-Macías, A. (1995). Alternative assessment: Responses to commonly asked questions. TESOL Journal, 5, 8-11.
25. Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269-293). Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
26. Ishihara, N. (2006). Subjectivity, second/foreign language pragmatic use, and instruction: Evidence of accommodation and resistance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
27. Ishihara, N. (2007). Web-based curriculum for pragmatics instruction in Japanese as a foreign language: An explicit awareness-raising approach. Language Awareness, 16, 21-40.
28. Ishihara, N. (2008). Transforming community norms: Potentials of L2 speakers' pragmatic resistance. In M. Hood (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2008 Temple University Japan Colloquium on Language Learning (pp. 1-10). Tokyo: Temple University Japan.
29. Ishihara, N. (in press). Assessing learners' pragmatic ability in the classroom. In D. Tatsuki & N. Houck (Eds.), Speech acts and beyond: New directions in pragmatics. Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
30. Ishihara, N., Aoshima, S., & Akikawa, K. (2008, April). Assessing pragmatic competence: A study of authentic assessment for foreign language pragmatics. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of American Association for Applied Linguistics, Washington, D.C.
31. Kasper, G., & Dahl, M. (1991). Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 215-247.
32. Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
33. Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. (2004). Dynamic assessment: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 49-74.
35. Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second lan-guage development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Liu, J. (2007). Developing a pragmatics test for Chinese EFL learners. Language Testing, 24, 391-415.
38. LoCastro, V. (2003). An introduction to pragmatics: Social action for language teachers. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
39. Lynch, B. K. (2001). Rethinking assessment from a critical perspective. Language Testing, 18, 351-372.
40. Lynch, B., & Shaw, P. (2005). Portfolios, power, and ethics. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 263-297.
41. Martínez-Flor, A., & Usó-Juan, E. (2006). A comprehensive pedagogical framework to develop pragmatics in the foreign language classroom: The 6R approach. Applied Language Learning, 16, 39-64. Available from http://www.dliflc.edu/archive/documents/all16two.pdf
42. Martínez-Flor, A., & Usó-Juan, E. (Eds.). (in press). Speech act performance: Theoretical groundings and methodological innovations. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
43. McLean, T. (2005). "Why no tip?" Student-generated DCTs in the ESL classroom. In D. Tatsuki (Ed.), Pragmatics in language learning, theory, and practice (pp. 150-156). Tokyo: The Japan Association for Language Teaching Pragmatics Special Interest Group.
44. McNamara, T. (2001). Language assessment as social practice: Challenges for research. Language Testing, 18, 333-349.
45. McNamara, T. F., & Roever, C. (2006). The social dimension of proficiency: How test-able is it? In Language testing: The social dimension (pp. 43-79). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
46. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
47. Moss, P. (1994). Can there be validity without reliability? Educational Researcher, 23, 5-12.
48. Norton, B. (2001). Non-participation, imagined communities and the language classroom. In M. Breen (ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 159-171). Harlow, England: Pearson Education.
49. Norris, J. M., Brown, J. D., Hudson, T., & Yoshioka, J. (1998). Designing second language performance assessments. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
50. Ohta, A. S. (2005). Interlanguage pragmatics in the zone of proximal development. System, 33, 503-517.
51. O'Malley, M., & Valdez Pierce, L. (1996). Authentic assessment for English language learners. White Plains, NY: Addison-Wesley.
52. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. Pavlenko, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Second language learning as participation and the (re)construction of selves. In A. Pavlenko & J. P. Lantolf (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 155-177). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54. Pearson, L. (2006). Teaching pragmatics in Spanish L2 courses: What do learners think? In K. Bardovi-Harlig, C. Félix-Brasdefer, & A. Omar (Eds.), Pragmatics and language learning, Volume 11 (pp. 109-134). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i at Manoa, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
55. Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56. Poehner, M. (2007). Beyond the test: L2 dynamic assessment and the transcendence of mediated learning. Modern Language Journal, 91, 323-340.
57. Rea-Dickins, P. (2001). Mirror, mirror on the wall: Identifying processes of classroom assessment. Language Testing, 18, 429-462.
58. Rea-Dickins, P. (2008). Classroom-based language assessment. In E. Shohamy & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Vol. 7. Language testing and assessment, 2nd ed. (pp. 257-271). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.
59. Rintell, E. M., & Mitchell, C. J. (1989). Studying requests and apologies: An inquiry into method. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House, & G. Kasper (Eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies (pp. 248-272). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
60. Rose, K. R. (1994). On the validity of discourse completion tests in non-Western contexts. Applied Linguistics, 15, 1-14.
61. Rose, K. R. (1999). Teachers and students learning about requests in Hong Kong. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in second language teaching and learning (pp. 167-180). Cambridge: University Press.
62. Röver, C. (2004). Difficulty and practicality in tests of interlanguage pragmatics. In D. Boxer & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Studying speaking to inform second language learning (pp. 283-301). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
63. Röver, C. (2005). Testing ESL pragmatics: Development and validation of a Web-based assessment battery. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
64. Schieffelin, B. B., & Ochs, E. (Eds.). (1986). Language socialization across cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66. Schneider, K. P., & Barron, A. (Eds.). (2008). Variational pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
67. Shohamy, E. (2001). Democratic assessment as an alternative. Language Testing, 18, 373-391.
68. Siegal, M. (1996). The role of learner subjectivity in second language sociolinguistic competency: Western women learning Japanese. Applied Linguistics, 17, 356-382.
69. Tanaka, K. (1997). Developing pragmatic competence: A learners-as-researchers approach. TESOL Journal, 6 (3), 14-18.
70. Tarone, E., & Yule, G. (1989). Focus on the language learner. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
71. Tatsuki, D. (Ed.). (2005). Pragmatics in language learning, theory, and practice. Tokyo: The Japan Association for Language Teaching Pragmatics Special Interest Group.
72. Tatsuki, D., & Houck, N. (Eds.). (in press). TESOL classroom practice series: Pragmatics volume. Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
73. Tedick, D. J. (Ed.). (2002). Proficiency-oriented language instruction and assessment: A curriculum handbook for teachers. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, the Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition.
74. Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied linguistics, 4, 91-109.
75. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
76. Washburn, G. N. (2001). Using situational comedies for pragmatic language teaching and learning. TESOL Journal, 10 (4), 21-26.
77. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
78. Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 17, 89-100.
79. Yamashita, S. O. (1996). Six measures of JSL pragmatics (Technical Report No. 14). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
80. Yates, L. (2003). Softening short requests. In K. Bardovi-Harlig & R. Mahan-Taylor (Eds.), Teaching pragmatics. Washington DC: U.S. Department of State, Office of English Programs. Retrieved June 15, 2008, from http://exchanges.state.gov/education/engteaching/pragmatics/ishihara.htm
81. Zuskin, R. D. (1993). Assessing L2 sociolinguistic competence: In search of support from pragmatic theories. In L. F. Bouton & Y. Kachru (Eds.), Pragmatics and language learning, Monograph series: Vol. 4. Selected papers presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Conference on Pragmatics and Language Learning (6th, Urbana, IL, April 2-4, 1992) (pp. 166-182). Urbana: University of Illinois at Urban Champaign.