Phylogenetic analysis of Toxicodendron (Anacardiaceae) and its biogeographic implications on the evolution of north temperate and tropical intercontinental disjunctions

Journal of Systematics and Evolution

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 416-430

  Nie, Ze Long ^a,b   Sun, Hang ^a   Meng, Ying ^a   Wen, Jun ^a,c,d  

^a KUNMING INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^c DEPARTMENT OF PALEOBIOLOGY   (United States)

^d INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (China)

Author keywords

Anacardiaceae; Biogeography; Disjunction; Eastern Asia; Neotropics; North America; Phylogenetics; Toxicodendron

Indexed keywords

ANACARDIACEAE; HEDERA; MYA; RHUS; TOXICODENDRON; TOXICODENDRON VERNIX; TOXICODENDRON VERNICIFLUUM;

EID: 70350309384     PISSN: 16744918     EISSN: 17596831     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1759-6831.2009.00045.x     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Aguilar-Ortigoza C, Sosa V. 2004. Taxonomic revision of the genus Pseudosmodingium (Anacardiaceae). Rhodora 106: 348-359
2. Aguilar-Ortigoza C, Sosa V, Angeles G. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships of three genera in Anacardiaceae: Bonetiella, Pseudosmodingium, and Smodingium. Brittonia 56: 169-184
3. Axelrod DI. 1975. Evolution and biogeography of MadreanTethyan Sclerophyll vegetation. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 62: 280-334
4. Barkley FA. 1937a. A monographic study of Rhus and its immediate allies in North and Central America, including the West Indies. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 24: 265-498
5. Barkley FA. 1937b. A new genus of Anacardiaceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 24: 1-10
6. Barkley FA. 1963. A criticism of the traditional concept of the genus Rhus. Prospects of Iraq Biology 3: 52-58
7. Brizicky GK. 1963. Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Rhus (Anacardiaceae). Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 44: 60-80
8. Cronquist A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. New York: Columbia University Press.
9. Davis CC, Bell CD, Mathews S, Donoghue MJ. 2002a. Laurasian migration explains Gondwanan disjunctions: evidence from Malpighiaceae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99: 6833-6837
10. Davis CC, Fritsch PW, Li JH, Donoghue MJ. 2002b. Phylogeny and biogeography of Cercis (Fabaceae): evidence from nuclear ribosomal ITS and chloroplast ndhF sequence data. Systematic Botany 27: 289-302
11. Donoghue MJ, Bell CD, Li JH. 2001. Phylogenetic patterns in Northern Hemisphere plant geography. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: S41-S52.
12. Drummond AJ, Ho SY, Phillips MJ, Rambaut A. 2006. Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biology 4: e88.
13. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A. 2007. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7: 214.
14. Farris JS, Källersjö M, Kluge AG, Bult C. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319
15. Felsenstein J. 1988. Phylogenies from molecular sequences: inference and reliability. Annual Review of Genetics 22: 521-565
16. Gillis WT. 1971. The systematics and ecology of poisonivy and the poison-oaks (Toxicodendron, Anacardiaceae). Rhodora 73: 72-159, 161-237, 370-443, 465-540
17. Gillis WT. 1975. Poison ivy and its kin. Arnoldia 35: 93-123
18. Graham A ed. 1972. Floristics and paleofloristics of Asia and eastern North America. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
19. Gray A. 1846. Analogy between the flora of Japan and that of the United States. American Journal of Science and Arts (series 2)2: 135-136
20. Gray A. 1859. Diagnostic characters of phanerogamous plants, collected in Japan by Charles Wright, botanist of the U.S. North Pacific Exploring Expedition, with observations upon the relationship of the Japanese flora to that of North America and of other parts of the northern temperate zone. Memoirs of the American Academy of Arts 6: 377-453
21. Hably L, Kvaček Z, Manchester SR. 2000. Shared taxa of land plants in the Oligocene of Europe and North America in context of Holarctic phytogeography. Acta Universitatis Carolinae-Geologica 44: 59-74
22. Hall TA.1999.BioEdit:auser-friendlybiologicalsequencealignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95-98
23. Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T. 1985. Dating of the humanape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. Journal of Molecular Evolution 22: 160-174
24. Heimsch C. 1940. Wood anatomy and pollen morphology of Rhus and allied genera. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 21: 279-291
25. Hipp AL, Hall JC, Sytsma KJ. 2004. Congruence versus phylogenetic accuracy: revisiting the incongruence length difference test. Systematic Biology 53: 81-89
26. Hopkins DM. 1967. The Bering land bridge. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
27. Howarth DG, Baum DA. 2002. Phylogenetic utility of a nuclear intron from nitrate reductase for the study of closely related plant species. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 23: 525-528
28. Hsü J. 1983. Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic vegetation in China, emphasizing their connections with North America. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 70: 490-508
29. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist R. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755
30. Ickert-Bond SM, Wen J. 2006. Phylogeny and biogeography of Altingiaceae: evidence from combined analysis of five non-coding chloroplast regions. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 39: 512-528
31. Ickert-Bond SM, Pigg KB, Wen J. 2007. Comparative infructescence morphology in Altingia (Altingiaceae) and discordance between morphological and molecular phylogenies. American Journal of Botany 94: 1094-1115
32. Lavin M, Luckow M. 1993. Origins and relationships of tropical North America in the context of the Boreotropics hypothesis. American Journal of Botany 80: 1-14
33. Li HL. 1952. Floristic relationships between eastern Asia and eastern North America. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 42: 371-429
34. MacGinitieHD.1937.ThefloraoftheWeavervillebedsofTrinity County, California with descriptions of plant-bearing beds. Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication 465: 84-151
35. MacGinitie HD. 1969. The Eocene Green River flora of northwestern Colorado and northeastern Utah. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences 83: 1-140
36. Manchester SR. 1994. Fruits and seeds of the middle Eocene Nut Beds flora, Clarno Formation, Oregon. Palaeontographica Americana 58: 1-205
37. McKenna MC. 1983. Cenozoic paleogeography of North Atlantic land bridges. In: Bott MHP, Saxov S, Talwani M, Thiede J eds. Structure and development of the Greenland-Scotland Ridge: new concepts and methods. New York: Plenum. 351-399
38. McNair JB. 1925. The geographical distribution in North America of poison ivy (Rhus toxicodendron) and allies. American Journal of Botany 12: 338-350
39. Miller AJ, Young DA, Wen J. 2001. Phylogeny and biogeography of Rhus (Anacardiaceae) based on ITS sequence data. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: 1401-1407
40. Min TL. 1980. The geographic distribution and floristic character of Chinese Anacardiaceae. Acta Botanica Yunnanica 2: 390-401
41. Muller J. 1984. Significance of fossil pollen for angiosperm history. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 71: 419-443
42. Nie Z-L, Sun H, Beardsley PM, Olmstead RG, Wen J. 2006. Evolution of biogeographic disjunction between eastern Asia and eastern North America in Phryma (Phrymaceae). American Journal of Botany 93: 1343-1356
43. Olmstead RG, Sweere JA. 1994. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: an empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Systematic Biology 43: 467-481
44. Pell SK. 2004. Molecular Systematics of the cashew family (Anacardiaceae). Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University.
45. Pell SK, Mitchell JD, Lowry PP, Randrianasolo A, Urbatsch LE. 2008. Phylogenetic split of Malagasy and African taxa of Protorhus and Rhus (Anacardiaceae) based on cpDNA trnLtrnF and nrDNA ETS and ITS sequence data. Systematic Botany 33: 375-383
46. Peng D, Wang X-Q. 2008. Reticulate evolution in Thuja inferred from multiple gene sequences: implications for the study of biogeographical disjunction between eastern Asia and North America. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 47: 1190-1202
47. Posada D, Buckley TR. 2004. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of the AIC and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Systematic Biology 53: 793-808
48. Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818
49. Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. 2007. Tracer v1.4. Available from http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/ [Accessed 2 November 2008].
50. Ramírez JL, Cevallos-Ferriz SRS. 2002. A diverse assemblage of Anacardiaceae from Oligocene sediments, Tepexi de Rodriguez, Puebla, Mexico. American Journal of Botany 89: 535-545
51. Renner SS. 2005. Relaxed molecular clocks for dating historical plant dispersal events. Trends in Plant Science 10: 550-558
52. Swofford DL. 2003. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods), version 4.0b10. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
53. Taberlet P, Gielly L, Pautou G, Bouvet J. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 1105-1109
54. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. 1997. The Clustal X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 24: 4876-4882
55. Tiffney BH. 1985a. Perspectives on the origin of the floristic similarity between eastern Asia and eastern North America. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 66: 73-94
56. Tiffney BH. 1985b. The Eocene North Atlantic land bridge: its importance in tertiary and modern phytogeography of the Northern hemisphere. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 66: 243-273
57. Tiffney BH. 2000. Geographic and climatic influences on the Cretaceous and Tertiary history of Euramerican floristic similarity. Acta Universitatis Carolinae-Geologica 44: 5-16
58. Tiffney BH, Manchester SR. 2001. The use of geological and paleontological evidence in evaluating plant phylogeographic hypotheses in the Northern Hemisphere tertiary. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: S3-S17.
59. Wang XQ, Tank DC, Sang T. 2000. Phylogeny and divergence times in Pinaceae: evidence from three genomes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17: 773-781
60. Wannan BS. 2006. Analysis of generic relationships in Anacardiaceae. Blumea 51: 165-195
61. Wen J. 1999. Evolution of eastern Asian and eastern North American disjunct distributions in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30: 421-455
62. Wen J. 2001. Evolution of eastern Asian-eastern North American biogeographic disjunctions: a few additional issues. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: S117-S122.
63. Wen J, Zimmer EA. 1996. Phylogeny and biogeography of Panax L. (the ginseng genus, Araliaceae): inferences from ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 6: 167-177
64. Wen J, Jansen RK, Zimmer EA. 1996. Phylogenetic relationships and DNA sequence divergence of eastern Asian and eastern North American disjunct plants. In: Nei M, Takahata N eds. Current topics in molecular evolution. University Park: Pennsylvania State University and Hayama: Graduate School for Advanced Studies 37-44
65. Wen J, Shi SH, Jansen RK, Zimmer EA. 1998. Phylogeny and biogeography of Aralia sect. Aralia (Araliaceae). American Journal of Botany 85: 866-875
66. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Shinsky JJ, White TJ eds. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego: Academic Press. 315-322
67. Wilf P. 2000. Late Paleocene-early Eocene climate changes in southwestern Wyoming: paleobotanical analysis. Geological Society of America Bulletin 112: 292-307
68. Wolfe JA. 1975. Some aspects of plant geography of the Northern Hemisphere during the late Cretaceous and Tertiary. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 62: 264-279
69. Woodson RE, Schery RW, Blackwell WH, Dodson CH. 1967. Flora of Panama. Part VI. Family 101. Anacardiaceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 54: 351-379
70. Xiang Q-Y, Manchester SR, Thomas DT, Zhang WH, Fan CZ. 2005. Phylogeny, biogeography, and molecular dating of Cornelian cherries (Cornus, Cornaceae): tracking tertiary plant migration. Evolution 59: 1685-1700
71. Xiang Q-Y, Soltis DE, Soltis PS. 1998a. Phylogenetic relationships of Cornaceae and close relatives inferred from matK and rbcL sequences. American Journal of Botany 85: 285-297
72. Xiang Q-Y, Soltis DE, Soltis PS. 1998b. The eastern Asian and eastern and western North American floristic disjunction: congruent phylogenetic patterns in seven diverse genera. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 10: 178-190
73. Yi TS, Miller AJ, Wen J. 2004. Phylogenetic and biogeographic diversification of Rhus (Anacardiaceae) in the Northern Hemisphere. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 33: 861-879
74. Yi TS, Miller AJ, Wen J. 2007. Phylogeny of Rhus (Anacardiaceae) based on sequences of nuclear NIA-i3 intron and chloroplast trnC-trnD. Systematic Botany 32: 379-391
75. Ying TS. 1983. The floristic relationships of the temperate forest regions of China and the United States. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 70: 597-604
76. Young DA. 1979. Heartwood flavonoids and the infrageneric relationships of Rhus (Anacardiaceae). American Journal of Botany 66: 502-510
77. Zhou SL, Renner SS, Wen J. 2006a. Molecular phylogeny and intra- and intercontinental biogeography of Calycanthaceae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 39: 1-15
78. Zhou ZK, Yang XF, Yang QS. 2006b. Land bridge and longdistance dispersal-Old views, new evidence. Chinese Science Bulletin 51: 1030-1038
79. Zomlefer WB. 1994. Guide to flowering plant families. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.