Comparative infructescence morphology in Altingia (Altingiaceae) and discordance between morphological and molecular phylogenies

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 94, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1094-1115

  Ickert Bond, Stefanie M ^a,b   Pigg, Kathleen B ^b   Wen, Jun ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION   (United States)

^d INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (China)

Author keywords

Altingia; Altingiaceae; Biogeography; Infructescence; Morphological stasis

Indexed keywords

BIOGEOGRAPHY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DICOTYLEDON; FRUITING; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENETICS;

ALTINGIA; ALTINGIACEAE; LIQUIDAMBAR; LIQUIDAMBAR ORIENTALIS; LIQUIDAMBAR STYRACIFLUA;

EID: 34447343598     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.94.7.1094     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. ARCHIE, J. W. 1985. Methods for coding variable morphological features for numerical taxonomic analysis. Systematic Zoology 34: 326-345.
2. BALDWIN, B. G., AND R. H. ROBINCHAUX. 1995. Historical biogeography and ecology of the Hawaiian silversword alliance (Asteraceae): new molecular phylogenetic perspectives. In W. L. Wagner and V. A. Funk [eds.], Hawaiian biogeography: evolution on a hot spot archipelago, 259-299. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
3. BOESEWINKEL, F. D., AND F. BOUMAN. 1984. The seed: structure. In B. M. Johri [ed.], Embryology of angiosperms, 567-610. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
4. BOGLE, A. L. 1986. The floral morphology and vascular anatomy of the Hamamelidaceae: subfamily Liquidambaroideae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 73: 325-347.
5. BOGLE, A. L., AND C. T. PHILBRICK. 1980. A generic atlas of hamamelidaceous pollens. Contributions from the Gray Herbarium of Harvard University 210: 29-103.
6. BUZAS, M. A., L. S. COLLINS, AND S. J. CULVER. 2002. Latitudinal difference in biodiversity caused by higher tropical rate of increase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99: 7841-7843.
7. CARLQUIST, S. 1982. The use of ethylene diamine in softening hard plant tissue for paraffin sectioning. Stain Technology 57: 311-317.
8. CHANG, H.-T. 1962. Semiliquidambar, novum Hamamelidacearum genus Sinicum. Sunyatsen University Bulletin of Natural Science 1: 34-44.
9. CHANG, H.-T. 1979. Hamamelidaceae. In H.-T. Chang [ed.], Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, vol. 35, no. 2, 36-166. Science Press, Beijing, China.
10. CHENG, W-C. 1947. New Chinese shrubs and trees. Forestry Institute, National Central University, Nanking, Research Notes, Dendrological Series 1: 1-4.
11. CORNER, E. J. H. 1976. The seeds of dicotyledons, vol. 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
12. CRAIB, W. G. 1928. Contributions to the flora of Siam. Kew Bulletin 1928: 68.
13. CRANE, P. R. 1989. Paleobotanical evidence on the early radiation of nonmagnoliid dicotyledons. Plant Systematics and Evolution 162: 165-191.
14. DOWELD, A. B. 1998. Carpology, seed anatomy and taxonomic relationships of Tetracentron (Tetracentraceae) and Trochodendron (Trochodendraceae). Annals of Botany 82: 413-443.
15. ELDREDGE, N., J. N. THOMPSON, P. N. BRAKEFIELD, S. GRAVRILETS, D. JABLONSKI, J. B. C. JACKSON, R. E. LENSKI, B. S. LIBERMAN, M. A. MCPEEK, AND W. MILLER III. 2005. Dynamics of evolutionary stasis. Paleobiology 3: 133-145.
16. ENDRESS, P. K. 1989a. Aspects of evolutionary differentiation of the Hamamelidaceae and the lower Hamamelididae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 162: 193-211.
17. ENDRESS, P. K. 1989b. A suprageneric taxonomic classification of the Hamamelidaceae. Taxon 38: 371-376.
18. ENDRESS, P. K. 1993. Hamamelidaceae. In K. Kubitzki [ed.], The families and genera of vascular plants, vol. 2, Flowering plants, dicotyledons, 322-330. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany.
19. ENDRESS, P. K., AND A. IGERSHEIM. 1999. Gynoecium diversity and systematics of the basal eudicots. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 130: 305-393.
20. ESAU, K. 1965. Plant anatomy. Wiley, New York, USA.
21. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
22. FERGUSON, D. K. 1989. A survey of the Liquidambaroideae (Hamamelidaceae) with a view to elucidating its fossil record. In P. R. Crane and S. Blackmore [eds.], Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, vol. 1, 249-272. Systematics Association special volume no. 40A. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
23. FERGUSON, D. K. 2002. Altingia siamensis, an apomorphic member of the Altingiaceae. 12th Flora of Thailand Meeting, 2002, 27. National Park, Wildlife and Plant Conservation Department, Bangkok, Thailand. Website http://www.dnp.go.th/botany/Image/events/Flora%20meeting/abstract.htm [accessed 2 July 2006].
24. GRAHAM, A. 1999. Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic history of North American vegetation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
25. GRAHAM, A. 2006. Paleobotanical evidence and molecular data in reconstructing the historical phytogeography of Rhizophoraceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 93: 325-334.
26. HERMSEN, E. J., K. C. NIXON, AND W. L. CREPET. 2006. The impact of extinct taxa on understanding the early evolution of angiosperm clades: an example incorporating fossil reproductive structures of Saxifragales. Plant Systematics and Evolution 260: 141-169.
27. HODGES, S. A., AND M. ARNOLD. 1994. Columbines: a geographically widespread species flock. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 91: 5129-5132.
28. HUFFORD, L. D., AND P. K. ENDRESS. 1989. The diversity of anther structure and dehiscence patterns among Hamamelididae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 99: 301-346.
29. ICKERT-BOND, S. M., K. B. PIGG, AND J. WEN. 2005. Comparative infructescence morphology in Liquidambar (Altingiaceae) and its evolutionary significance. American Journal of Botany 92: 1234-1255.
30. ICKERT-BOND, S. M., AND J. WEN. 2006. Phylogeny and biogeography of Altingiaceae: evidence from combined analysis of five non-coding chloroplast regions. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 39: 512-528.
31. JOHANSEN, D. A. 1940. Plant microtechnique. McGraw Hill, New York, New York, USA.
32. KIRCHHEIMER, F. 1943. Über Steinhauera subglobosa Presl. und die Reste von Liquidambar-Fruchtständen aus dem Tertiär Mitteleuropas. Neues Jahrbuch fü r Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie Monatshefte, Abteilung. B, Heft 8/9: 216-236.
33. KIRCHHEIMER, F. 1957. Die Laubgewächse der Braunkohlenzeit. VEB Wilhelm Knapp Verlag, Halle (Salle), Germany.
34. LECOMPTE, E., C. DENYS, AND L. GRANJON. 2005. Confrontation of morphological and molecular data: the Praomys group (Rodentia, Murinae) as a case of adaptive convergences and morphological stasis. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 37: 899-919.
35. LOBOVA, T. A., A. M. SCOTT, F. BLANCHARD, H. PECKHAM, AND P. CHARLES-DOMINIQUE. 2003. Cecropia as a food resource for bats in French Guiana and the significance of fruit structure in seed dispersal and longevity. American Journal of Botany 90: 388-403.
36. MAI, H. D. 1968. Zwei ausgestorbene Gattungen im Tertiär Europas und ihre florengeschichtliche Bedeutung. Palaeontographica 123B: 184-199.
37. MEIKLE, R. D. 1977. Flora of Cyprus, vol. 1. Betham-Moxum Trust, Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew, UK.
38. MELIKIAN, A. P. 1971. The anatomical structure of the spermoderm of the representatives of the genera Liquidamabar L. and Altingia Nor. relative to its systematics. Biologicheski Zhurnal Armenii 24: 50-55.
39. MELIKIAN, A. P. 1973. Seed coat types of Hamamelidaceae and allied families in relation to their systematics. Botaneski Zhurnal 58: 350-359.
40. MERRILL, E. D., AND W.-Y. CHUN. 1935. Hainan plants. Sunyatsenia 2: 238.
41. MORITZ, C., J. L. PATTON, C. J. SCHNEIDER, AND T. B. SMITH. 2000. Diversification of rainforest faunas: an integrated approach. Annual Reviews in Ecology and Systematics 31: 533-563.
42. MORLEY, R. J. 1999. Origin and evolution of tropical rainforests. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
43. NETOLITZKY, F. 1926. Anatomie der Angiospermen-Samen. Handbuch der Pflanzenanatomie. II. Abteilung, 2. Teil: Pteridophyten und Anthophyten. Verlag von Gebrueder Borntraeger, Berlin, Germany.
44. NIE, Z.-L., H. SUN, P. M. BEARDSLEY, R. G. OLMSTEAD, AND J. WEN. 2006. Evolution of biogeographic disjunction between eastern Asia and eastern North America in Phyrma (Phyrmaceae). American Journal of Botany 93: 1343-1356.
45. PIGG, K. B., S. M. ICKERT-BOND, AND J. WEN. 2004. Anatomically preserved Liquidambar (Altingiaceae) from the Middle Miocene of Yakima Canyon, Washington State, USA, and its biogeographic implications. American Journal of Botany 91: 499-509.
46. RAO, R. P. M. 1974. Seed anatomy in some Hamamelidaceae and phylogeny. Phytomorphology 24: 113-139.
47. REICHINGER, K. H. 1943. Flora Aegaea. Flora der Inseln und Halbinselsn des Ägäischen Meeres. Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien. Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, Denkschriften 105: 1-924.
48. SAKALA, J., AND C. PRIVÉ-GILL. 2004. Oligocene angiosperm woods from Northwestern Bohemia, Czech Republic. International Association of Wood Anatomists Journal 25: 369-380.
49. SCHMIDT, R. 1986. On Cornerian and other terminology of angiospermous and gymnospermous seed coats: historical perspective and terminological recommendations. Taxon 35: 476-491.
50. SHI, S., Y. HUANG, H.-T. CHANG, Y. CHEN, L. QU, AND J. WEN. 1998. Phylogeny of the Hamamelidaceae based on ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 26: 55-69.
51. STEVENS, P. F. 2000 onward. Angiosperm phylogeny website, version 6, 22 May 2006 [and more or less continuously updated since]. Website http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/ [accessed 19 June 2006].
52. STOPP, K. 1950. Karpologische Studien I und II. Vergleichend-morphologische Untersuchungen über die Dehiszensformen der Kapselfrüchte. Abhandlungen der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse, Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Mainz 7: 165-210.
53. SWOFFORD, D. I. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4b. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
54. TAKHTAJAN, A. 1996. Anatomia seminum comparativa, vol. 5. Nauka, Leningrad, Russian Federation.
55. TARDIEU-BLOT, M. L. 1965. Hamamelidaceae. In A. Aubréville and M. L. Tardieu-Blot [eds.], Flore du Cambodge du Laos et du Vietnâm, fascicle 4, 75-116. Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.
56. TIFFNEY, B. H. 1984. Seed size, dispersal syndromes, and the rise of the angiosperms, evidence and hypotheses. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 71: 551-576.
57. VINK, W. 1957. Hamamelidaceae. In C. G. J. van Steenis [ed.], Flora Malesiana, vol. 5. Nationaal Herbarium, Leiden, Netherlands.
58. WEN, J. 1998. Evolution of eastern Asian and eastern North American disjunct pattern: insights from phylogenetic studies. Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy 28: 63-81.
59. WEN, J. 1999. Evolution of the eastern Asian-eastern North American biogeographic disjunctions in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30: 421-455.
60. WEN, J. 2001. Evolution of eastern Asian-eastern North American biogeographic disjunctions: a few additional issues. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: S117-S122.
61. WINKLER, H. 1936. Septizide Kapsel und Spaltfrucht. Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen 24: 191-200.
62. ZAVADA, M. S., AND D. L. DILCHER. 1986. Comparative pollen morphology and its relationship to phylogeny of pollen in the Hamamelidae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 73: 348-381.
63. ZHANG, Z. Y., AND J. WEN. 1996. The seed morphology in Hamamelidaceae and its systematic evaluation. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 34: 538-546.
64. ZHANG, Z. Y., H.-T. ZHANG, AND P. K. ENDRESS. 2003. Hamamelidaceae. In Z.-Y. Wu, P. H. Raven, and D.-Y. Hong [eds.], Flora of China, vol. 9, 18-42. Science Press, Beijing, China.
65. ZHOU, Z.-K., W. L. CREPET, AND K. C. NIXON. 2001. The earliest fossil evidence of the Hamamelidaceae: late Cretaceous (Turonian) inflorescences and fruits of Altingioideae. American Journal of Botany 88: 753-766.