Direct catalytic asymmetric mannich-type reaction of thioamides

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Volumn 48, Issue 27, 2009, Pages 5026-5029

  Suzuki, Yuta ^a   Yazaki, Ryo ^a   Kumagai, Naoya ^a   Shibasaki, Masakatsu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Asymmetric catalysis; Copper; Mannich reactions; Proton transfer; Thioamides

Indexed keywords

ASYMMETRIC CATALYSIS; COOPERATIVE CATALYSIS; LEWIS ACID; MANNICH REACTIONS; MANNICH-TYPE REACTIONS; PRONUCLEOPHILES; THIOAMIDES;

CATALYSIS;

PROTON TRANSFER;

IMINE; MANNICH BASE; THIOAMIDE;

CATALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; STEREOISOMERISM;

CATALYSIS; IMINES; MANNICH BASES; STEREOISOMERISM; THIOAMIDES;

EID: 70349931503     PISSN: 14337851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/anie.200901588     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. T.S. Jagodzinski, Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 197, and references therein.
2. a) Y. Tamaru, T. Harada, S.-I. Nishi, M. Mizutani, T. Hioki, Z.-I. Yoshida, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102. 7806;
3. b) Y. Tamaru, T. Hioki, Z.-I. Yoshida, Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 5793.
4. C. Goasdoue, N. Goasdoue, M. Gaudemar, M. Mladenova, J. Organomet. Chem. 1982, 226, 209.
5. a) C. Goasdoue, N. Goasdoue, M. Gaudemar, Tetrahedron Lett. 1983. 24. 4001;
6. b) C. Goasdoue, N. Goasdoue, M. Gaudemar, Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 537.
7. C Goasdoue, M. Gaudemar, Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26. 1015.
8. N. Iwasawa, T. Yura, T. Mukaiyama. Tetrahedron 1989. 45, 1197.
9. a) B. M. Trost, Science 1991, 254, 1471;
10. b) P. A. Wender, V. A. Verma, T. J. Paxton, T. H. Pillow, Ace. Chem. Res 2008, 41, 40.
11. For the utility of N-diphenylphosphinoyl imines, see: a) S. M. Weinreb, R. K. Orr, Synthesis 2005. 1205:
12. b) G. K. Friestad, A. K. Mathies, Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 2541.
13. For recent reviews on direct Mannich(-type) reactions, see: a) M. M. B. Marques. Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 356;
14. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 348;
15. b) A. Ting, S. E. Schaus, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 5797;
16. c) J.M. M. Verkade, L. J. C. van Hemert. P. J. L. M. Quaedflieg, F. P. J. T. Rutjes, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 29;
17. for general reviews on catalytic asymmetric Mannich reactions, see: d) S. Kobayashi, M. Ueno in Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis, Supplement 1 (Eds.: E.N. Jacobsen, A. Pfaltz, H. Yamamoto). Springer, Berlin. 2004, Chapter 29.5, p. 143;
18. e) G. Friestad, A. K. Mathies, Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 2541.
19. a) Y. Suto, R. Tsuji, M. Kanai, M. Shibasaki. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3757;
20. b) Y. Asano, K. Hara, H. Ito, M. Sawamura, Org. Lett. 2007. 9, 3901;
21. c) R. Yazaki. T. Nitabaru. N. Kumagai. M. Shibasaki, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 14477;
22. d) R. Yazaki, N. Kumagai, M. Shibasaki, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 3195;
23. for selected examples of catalytic asymmetric formation of C-C or C-B bonds using Cu/alkoxides, see: e) B. L. Pagenkopf, J. Krüger, A. Stojanovic, E. M. Carreira, Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 3312;
24. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 3124;
25. f) H. Ito, C. Kawakami, M. Sawamura, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005. 127, 16034;
26. g) R. Wada. T. Shibuguchi, S. Makino, K. Oisaki, M. Kanai, M. Shibasaki, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7687;
27. h) J.-E. Lee, J. Yun, Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 151;
28. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008. 47, 145.
29. Sulfur has an electronegativity close to that for carbon: a) L. Pauling in The Nature of Chemical Bond, 3rd ed., Cornel University, Ithaca, NY, 1960, pp. 88;
30. for rotational barriers of thioamides, see: b) C. M. Lee, W. D. Kumler, J. Org. Chem. 1962, 27, 2052;
31. c) K. A. Jensen, Acta Chem. Scand. 1963, 17, 551;
32. d) A. Loewenstein, A. Melera, P. Rigny, W. Walter, J. Phys. Chem. 1964, 68, 1597;
33. e) W. E. Stewart, T. H. Siddall III. Chem. Rev. 1970, 70, 517.
34. a) K. B. Wiberg, P. R. Rabien, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 2201;
35. b) D. Lauvergnat, P.C. Hiberty, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9478;
36. c) B. Galabov, S. Ilieva, B. Hadjieva. E. Dinchova, J. Phys Chem. A 2003. 107. 5854.
37. a = 25.7 in DMSO; F.G. Bordwell, H. E. Fried, J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 4218)
38. a= 35 in DMSO; M. L. Hlavinka, J. F. Greco, J. R. Hagadorn, Chem. Commun. 2005, 5304).
39. As of May 2009, this commercially available C2 unit sells for ε85.7 per 5 g from A Better Choice for Research Chemicals.
40. a= 19.1 in DMSO) would avoid undesirable ß elimination.
41. The absolute configuration of 3 ab was determined by single Xray crystallographic analysis. Mr = 475.67, colorless block; a = 13.9241(3), b = 19.8931(4). c = 21.3053(4) Å, α = 64.6031(10)°, β= 118.497(7)°, γ = 88.5534(11)°. V=5228.95(19) Å, T= 103 K, triclinic, space group P1, Z = 8, Rigaku RAXIS-RAPID, λ(Cu Kα) = 1.54187 Å, 0max = 68.25°. The crystallographic data (CCDC-720992) can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallogrpahic Data Center via www.ccdc.cam. ac.uk/data-request/cif.
42. I salt, see: P. G. Eller. G. J. Kubas. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99. 4346.
43. D. C. Harrowven. M. C. Lucas, P. D. Howes, Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 1187.
44. R. Masuda, M. Hojo, T. Ichi, S. Sasano, T. Kobayashi, C. Kuroda, Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 1195.