-
1
-
-
33745712700
-
-
For reviews, see: a
-
For reviews, see: a) I. Beletskaya, C. Moberg, Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 2320-2354;
-
(2006)
Chem. Rev
, vol.106
, pp. 2320-2354
-
-
Beletskaya, I.1
Moberg, C.2
-
2
-
-
0001008441
-
-
b) G. J. Irvine, M. J. G. Lesley, T. B. Marder, N. C. Norman, C. R. Rice, E. G. Robins, W. R. Roper, G. R. Whittell, L. J. Wright, Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 2685-2722;
-
(1998)
Chem. Rev
, vol.98
, pp. 2685-2722
-
-
Irvine, G.J.1
Lesley, M.J.G.2
Marder, T.B.3
Norman, N.C.4
Rice, C.R.5
Robins, E.G.6
Roper, W.R.7
Whittell, G.R.8
Wright, L.J.9
-
4
-
-
0004205240
-
-
Eds, M. Davidson, A. K. Hughes, T. B. Marder, K. Wade, RSC Cambridge
-
d) Contemporary Boron Chemistry (Eds.: M. Davidson, A. K. Hughes, T. B. Marder, K. Wade). RSC Cambridge, 2000.
-
(2000)
Contemporary Boron Chemistry
-
-
-
5
-
-
0002253853
-
-
a) Y. G. Lawson, M. J. G. Lesley, T. B. Marder, N. C. Norman, C. R. Rice, Chem. Commun. 1997, 2051-2052;
-
(1997)
Chem. Commun
, pp. 2051-2052
-
-
Lawson, Y.G.1
Lesley, M.J.G.2
Marder, T.B.3
Norman, N.C.4
Rice, C.R.5
-
6
-
-
0035802156
-
-
b) H. Abu Ali, I. Goldberg, M. Srebnik, Organometallics 2001, 20, 3962-3965;
-
(2001)
Organometallics
, vol.20
, pp. 3962-3965
-
-
Abu Ali, H.1
Goldberg, I.2
Srebnik, M.3
-
7
-
-
4644236574
-
-
c) N. J. Bell, A. J. Cox, N. R. Cameron, J. S. O. Evans, T. B. Marder, M. A. Duin, C. J. Elsevier, X. Baucherel, A. A. D. Tulloch, R. P. Tooze, Chem. Commun. 2004, 1854-1855.
-
(2004)
Chem. Commun
, pp. 1854-1855
-
-
Bell, N.J.1
Cox, A.J.2
Cameron, N.R.3
Evans, J.S.O.4
Marder, T.B.5
Duin, M.A.6
Elsevier, C.J.7
Baucherel, X.8
Tulloch, A.A.D.9
Tooze, R.P.10
-
8
-
-
0037170637
-
-
G. W. Kabalka, B. C. Das, S. Das, Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 2323-2325.
-
(2002)
Tetrahedron Lett
, vol.43
, pp. 2323-2325
-
-
Kabalka, G.W.1
Das, B.C.2
Das, S.3
-
9
-
-
0034718310
-
-
a) H. Ito, H. Yamanaka, J. Tateiwa, A. Hosomi, Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 6821-6825;
-
(2000)
Tetrahedron Lett
, vol.41
, pp. 6821-6825
-
-
Ito, H.1
Yamanaka, H.2
Tateiwa, J.3
Hosomi, A.4
-
10
-
-
0006272242
-
-
b) K. Takahashi, T. Ishiyama, N. Miyaura, J. Organomet. Chem. 2001, 625, 47-53.
-
(2001)
J. Organomet. Chem
, vol.625
, pp. 47-53
-
-
Takahashi, K.1
Ishiyama, T.2
Miyaura, N.3
-
11
-
-
33750292358
-
-
S. Mun, J.-E. Lee, J. Yun, Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4887-4889.
-
(2006)
Org. Lett
, vol.8
, pp. 4887-4889
-
-
Mun, S.1
Lee, J.-E.2
Yun, J.3
-
12
-
-
37549048101
-
-
Eds, P. V. Ramachandran, H. C. Brown, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC
-
a) Organoboranes for syntheses, ACS symposium series 783 (Eds.: P. V. Ramachandran, H. C. Brown), American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 2001;
-
(2001)
Organoboranes for syntheses, ACS symposium series 783
-
-
-
14
-
-
33845332989
-
-
a) D. Lee, D. Kim, J. Yun, Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 2851-2853;
-
(2006)
Angew. Chem
, vol.118
, pp. 2851-2853
-
-
Lee, D.1
Kim, D.2
Yun, J.3
-
15
-
-
33746216296
-
-
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2785-2787;
-
(2006)
Chem. Int. Ed
, vol.45
, pp. 2785-2787
-
-
Angew1
-
17
-
-
34547418739
-
-
c) D. Lee, Y. Yang, J. Yun, Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2749-2751.
-
(2007)
Org. Lett
, vol.9
, pp. 2749-2751
-
-
Lee, D.1
Yang, Y.2
Yun, J.3
-
18
-
-
37549041425
-
-
Other diphosphine ligands, such as various josiphos analogues and binap, were also surveyed in the boron addition reaction with 1e but gave poorer enantioselectivities (less than 50% ee). In this case, the best result was again obtained with josiphos. Other ligands, such as 2-(diphenylphosphino- 2′-methoxy-1,1′-binaphthyl) (mop) and binapthol-derived phosphoramidite, gave incomplete conversion and very low asymmetric inductions (less than 7 % ee).
-
Other diphosphine ligands, such as various josiphos analogues and binap, were also surveyed in the boron addition reaction with 1e but gave poorer enantioselectivities (less than 50% ee). In this case, the best result was again obtained with josiphos. Other ligands, such as 2-(diphenylphosphino- 2′-methoxy-1,1′-binaphthyl) (mop) and binapthol-derived phosphoramidite, gave incomplete conversion and very low asymmetric inductions (less than 7 % ee).
-
-
-
-
19
-
-
37549023546
-
-
The condition A gave slightly better enantioselectivities (0-2% ee) than the reaction conditions using the 1:1.5:1 combination of copper/base/L1.
-
The condition A gave slightly better enantioselectivities (0-2% ee) than the reaction conditions using the 1:1.5:1 combination of copper/base/L1.
-
-
-
-
21
-
-
37549019774
-
-
The major enantiomer of the other unknown products 3 was assumed to have the same configuration as the known cases (3a, 3b, 3d, 3e, and 3i).
-
The major enantiomer of the other unknown products 3 was assumed to have the same configuration as the known cases (3a, 3b, 3d, 3e, and 3i).
-
-
-
-
22
-
-
37549045349
-
-
With the ester substrates, longer reaction times (16-24 h) were required than with the nitriles substrates (less than 12 h) for complete conversion
-
With the ester substrates, longer reaction times (16-24 h) were required than with the nitriles substrates (less than 12 h) for complete conversion.
-
-
-
|