Imageless computer navigation without preoperative templating may lead to malpreparation of the femoral head in hip resurfacing

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 91, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1281-1286

  Olsen, M ^a   Davis, E T ^a,b   Chiu, M ^a   Gamble, P ^a   Tumia, N ^a   Boyle, R A ^a   Schemitsch, E H ^a  

^a ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b Royal Orthopaedic NHS Trust   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CADAVER; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; FEMUR SHAFT; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SOFTWARE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 70349656501     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B10.22020     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Shimmin AJ, Back D. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:463-464
2. Amstutz HC, Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:28-39.
3. Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, LeDuff M, Gruen T, Amstutz HC. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop 2004;418:87-93.
4. Marker DR, Seyler TM, Jinnah RH, et al. Femoral neck fractures after metal-onmetal total hip resurfacing: a prospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty 2007;22(7 Suppl 3):66-71.
5. Cobb JP, Kannan V, Brust K, Thevendran G. Navigation reduces the learning curve in resurfacing total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2007;463:90-97
6. Ganapathi M, Vendittoli PA, Lavigne M, Gunther KP. Femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing with and without navigation. Clin Orthop 2009;467:1341-1347
7. Olsen M, Davis ET, Waddell JP, Schemitsch EH. Imageless computer navigation for placement of the femoral component in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B:310-315
8. Resubal JR, Morgan DA. Computer-assisted vs conventional mechanical jig technique in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:341-350
9. Amstutz HC, Campbell PA, Le Duff MJ. Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:1874-1877 (Pubitemid 39223453)
10. Beaulé PE, Amstutz HC. Orientation of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005;87-A:1162.
11. Freeman MA. Total surface replacement hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1978;134:2-4.
12. McMinn D, Daniel J. History and modern concepts in surface replacement. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2006;220:239-251
13. Anglin C, Masri BA, Tonetti J, Hodgson AJ, Greidanus NV. Hip resurfacing femoral neck fracture influenced by valgus placement. Clin Orthop 2007;465:71-79 (Pubitemid 350306496)
14. Davis ET, Olsen M, Zdero R, Waddell JP, Schemitsch EH. Femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing: the effect of alignment of the femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:1522-1527
15. Burdock EI, Fleiss JL, Hardesty AS. A new view of interobserver agreement. Pers Pyschol 1963;16:373-384
16. No authors listed. MKAPPASC.SPS. Available from ftp://ftp.spss.com/pub/ spss/statistics/nichols/macros/mkappasc.sps (date last accessed 12 February 2009).
17. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174
18. Cobb JP, Kannan V, Dandachli W, et al. Learning how to resurface cam-type femoral heads with acceptable accuracy and precision: the role of computed tomography-based navigation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008;90-A(Suppl 3):57-64.
19. Hart R, Svab P, Filan P. Intraoperative navigation in hip surface arthroplasty: a radiographic comparative analysis study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2008;128:429-434
20. Schnurr C, Michael JW, Eysel P, Konig DP. Imageless navigation of hip resurfacing arthroplasty increases the implant accuracy. Int Orthop 2009;33:365-372
21. Seyler TM, Lai LP, Sprinkle DI, Ward WG, Jinnah RH. Does computer-assisted surgery improve accuracy and decrease the learning curve in hip resurfacing?: a radiographic analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008;90-A(Suppl 3):71-80.
22. Davis ET, Gallie P, Macgroarty K, Waddell JP, Schemitsch E. The accuracy of image-free computer navigation in the placement of the femoral component of the Birmingham hip resurfacing: a cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:557-560
23. Hodgson A, Helmy N, Masri B, et al. Comparative repeatability of guide-pin axis positioning in computer-assisted and manual femoral head resurfacing arthroplasty. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2007;221:713-724
24. Hodgson AJ, Inkpen KB, Shekhman M, et al. Computer-assisted femoral head resurfacing. Comput Aided Surg 2005;10:337-343
25. Eckrich SG, Noble PC, Tullos HS. Effect of rotation on the radiographic appearance of the femoral canal. J Arthroplasty 1994;9:419-426
26. Garry SC, Khangri GS, Lambert RG. Femoral neck radiography: effect of flexion on visualization. Can Assoc Radiol J 2005;56:155-162
27. Kay RM, Jaki KA, Skaggs DL. The effect of femoral rotation on the projected femoral neck-shaft angle. J Pediatr Orthop 2000;20:736-739
28. Olsen M, Davis ET, Gallie PA, Waddell JP, Schemitsch EH. The reliability of radiographic assessment of femoral neck-shaft and implant angulation in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:333-340
29. Bailey C, Gul R, Falworth M, Zadow S, Oakeshott R. Component alignment in hip resurfacing using computer navigation. Clin Orthop 2009;467:917-922
30. Romanowski JR, Swank ML. Imageless navigation in hip resurfacing: avoiding component malposition during the surgeon learning curve. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008;90-A(Suppl 3):65-70.