Intraoperative navigation in hip surface arthroplasty: A radiographic comparative analysis study

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Volumn 128, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 429-434

  Hart, Radek ^a   Šváb, Pavel ^a   Filan, Peter ^a  

^a General Hospital Znojmo   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Computer navigation; Surface arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 41149149865     PISSN: 09368051     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-007-0540-3     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Amstutz HC, Campbell PA, Duff ML (2004) Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg 86A:1874-1877
2. Vendittoli PA, Lavigne M, Winzenrieth R, Plamondon D, Nuno N (2006) Factors affecting hip range of motion in surface replacement arthroplasty. Hip Int 16(Suppl):106
3. Itayem R, Arndt A, Nistor L, McMinn D, Lundberg A (2005) Stability of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty at two years. A radiostereophotogrammetric analysis study. J Bone Joint Surg 87B:158-162
4. Glyn-Jones S, Gill HS, McLardy-Smith P, Murray DW (2004) Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 86B:172-176
5. Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJW (2003) Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg 86B:177-184
6. Alberton GM, High WA, Morrey BF (2002) Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: An analysis of risk factors and treatment options. J Bone Joint Surg 84A:1788-1792
7. Kishida Y, Sugano N, Nishii T, Miki H, Yamaguchi K, Yoshikawa H (2004) Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg 86B:185-189
8. Silva M, Lee KH, Heisel Ch, delaRosa MA, Schmalzried TP (2004) The biomechanical results of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 86A:40-46
9. Bogoch ER, Fornasier VL, Capello WN (1982) The femoral head remnant in resurfacing arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 167:92-105
10. Ito K, Minka MA, Leunig M, Werlen S, Ganz R (2001) Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect. A MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset. J Bone Joint Surg 83B:171-176
11. Nötzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, Schmid MR, Treiber K, Hodler J (2002) The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of the anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg 84B:556-560
12. Meyer DC, Beck M, Ellis T, Ganz R, Leunig M (2006) Comparison of six radiographic projections to assess femoral head/neck asphericity. Clin Orthop 445:181-185
13. D'Lima DD, Chen PC, Colwell CW Jr (2001) Optimizing acetabular component position to minimize impingement and reduce contact stress. J Bone Joint Surg 83A:87-91
14. Berry DJ (1999) Dislocation. In: Steinberg ME, Garino JP (eds) Revision total hip arthroplasty. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 463-481
15. Beaulé PE, Lee JL, LeDuff MJ, Amstutz HC, Ebramzadeh E (2004) Orientation of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip. A biomechanical and clinical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg 86A:2015-2021
16. Bernsmann K, Langlotz U, Ansari B, Wiese M (2000) Computer assisted navigated cup placement in hip arthroplasty - application study in clinical routine. Z Orthop 138:515-521
17. DiGioia AM, Jaramaz B, Blackwell M, Simon DA, Morgan F, Moody JE, Nikou C, Colgan BD, Aston CA, Labarca RS, Kischell E, Kanade T (1998) The Otto Aufranc Award. Image guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively actabular implant alignment. Clin Orthop 355:8-22
18. Haaker R, Tiedjen K, Rubenthaler F, Stockheim M (2003) Computer assisted navigated cup placement in primary and secondary dysplastic hips. Z Orthop 141:105-111
19. Jaramaz B, DiGioia AM, Blackwell M, Nikou C (1998) Computer assisted measurement of cup placement in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 354:70-81
20. Kiefer H (2003) OrthoPilot cup navigation - how to optimise cup positioning? Int Orthop 27(S1):S37-S42
21. Ottersbach A, Haaker R (2005) Optimization of cup positioning in THA - comparison between conventional mechanical instrumentation and computer-assisted implanted cups by using the OrthoPilot navigation system. Z Orthop 143:611-615
22. Saxler G, Marx A, Vabndervelde D (2004) A comparison of free-hand and computer assisted cup placement in total hip arthroplasty. Z Orthop 142:286-291
23. Štipčák V, Stoklas J, Hart R, Janeček M (2004) Implantation of a non-cemented acetabulum with the use of a navigation system. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 71:288-291
24. Richolt JA, Rittmeister ME (2006) Misinterpretation of the anteversion in computer-assisted acetabular cup navigation as a result of a simplified palpation method of the frontal pelvic plane. An untrasonographic assessment. Z Orthop 144:305-310
25. Štipčák V, Hart R, Kučera B (2006) Our experience with an image guided navigation system for accurate alignment in total hip replacement by minimally invasive posterolateral surgery. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 73:350-352
26. Hess T, Gampe T, Köttgen C, Szawlowski B (2004) Intraoperative navigation for hip resurfacing. Methods and first results. Orthopade 33:1183-1193
27. Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Kalteis T, Grifka J (2007) Comparison of fluoroscopic and landmark-based technique with the Vector-Vision system. In: Stiehl JB, Konermann WH, Haaker RG, DiGioia AM (eds) Navigation and MIS in orthopedic surgery. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 359-364
28. Chandler M, Kowalski RSZ, Watkins ND, Briscoe A, New AMR (2006) Cementing techniques in hip resurfacing. Proc IMechE 220(part H):321-331
29. Siebel T, Maubach S, Morlock MM (2006) Lessons learned from early clinical experience and results of 300 ASR ™ hip resurfacing implantations. Proc IMechE 220(part H):345-353