Imageless computer navigation for placement of the femoral component in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 91, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 310-315

  Olsen, M ^a   Davis, E T ^b   Waddell, J P ^a   Schemitsch, E H ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE   (United Kingdom)

^c ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ANTERIOR POSTERIOR AXIS; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HIP RESURFACING; HUMAN; IMPLANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT PLANNING; EVALUATION; FEMUR; HIP; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP PROSTHESIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 63049121864     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B3.21288     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Amstutz HC, Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:28-39.
2. Back DL, Dalziel R, Young D, Shimmin A. Early results of primary birmingham hip resurfacings: an independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:324-9.
3. Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJ. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B:177-84.
4. Hing CB, Back DL, Bailey M, et al. The results of primary birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years: an independent prospective review of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:1431-8.
5. Mont MA, Seyler TM, Ulrich SD, et al. Effect of changing indications and techniques on total hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop 2007;465:63-70.
6. Steffen RT, Pandit HP, Palan J, et al. The five-year results of the birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:436-41.
7. Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:167-70.
8. Amstutz HC, Campbell PA, Le Duff MJ. Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:1874-7.
9. Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, LeDuff M, Gruen T, Amstutz HC. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop 2004;418:87-93.
10. Beaulé PE, Amstutz HC. Orientation of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005;87-A:1162.
11. De Smet KA. Belgium experience with metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2005;36:203-13.
12. Freeman MA. Total surface replacement hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1978;134:2-4.
13. Marker DR, Seyler TM, Jinnah RH, et al. Femoral neck fractures after metal-onmetal total hip resurfacing: a prospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:66-71.
14. McMinn D, Daniel J. History and modern concepts in surface replacement. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2006;220:239-51.
15. Shimmin AJ, Back D. Femoral neck fractures following birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:463-4.
16. Shimmin AJ, Bare J, Back DL. Complications associated with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2005;36:187-93.
17. Siebel T, Maubach S, Morlock MM. Lessons learned from early clinical experience and results of 300 ASR hip resurfacing implantations. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2006;220:345-53.
18. Davis ET, Gallie P, Macgroarty K, Waddell J P, Schemitsch E. The accuracy of image-free computer navigation in the placement of the femoral component of the birmingham hip resurfacing: a cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:557-60.
19. Barrett AR, Davies BL, Gomes M P, et al. Preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance for accurate computer-assisted minimally invasive hip resurfacing surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2006;220:759-73.
20. Barrett AR, Davies BL, Gomes M P, et al. Computer-assisted hip resurfacing surgery using the acrobot navigation system. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2007;221:773-85.
21. Ganapathi M, Vendittoli PA, Lavigne M, Gunther KP. Femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing with and without navigation: Clin Orthop 2008;Epub.
22. Hess T, Gampe T, Kottgen C, Szawlowski B. Intraoperative navigation for hip resurfacing: methods and first results. Orthopade 2004;33:1183-93 (in German).
23. Hodgson A, Helmy N, Masri BA, et al. Comparative repeatability of guide-pin axis positioning in computer-assisted and manual femoral head resurfacing arthroplasty. Proc Inst Mech Engh [H] 2007;221:713-24.
24. Hodgson AJ, Inkpen KB, Shekhman M, et al. Computer-assisted femoral head resurfacing. Comput Aided Surg 2005;10:337-43.
25. Resubal JR, Morgan DA. Computer-assisted vs conventional mechanical jig technique in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008; Epub.
26. Romanowski JR, Swank ML. Imageless navigation in hip resurfacing: avoiding component malposition during the surgeon learning curve. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008;90-A:65-70.
27. Schnurr C, Michael JW, Eysel P, Konig DP. Imageless navigation of hip resurfacing arthroplasty increases the implant accuracy. Int Orthop 2007; Epub.
28. Seyler TM, Lai LP, Sprinkle DI, Ward WG, Jinnah RH. Does computer-assisted surgery improve accuracy and decrease the learning curve in hip resurfacing?: a radiographic analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008;90-A(Suppl 3):71-80.
29. Bobroff ED, Chambers HG, Sartoris DJ, Wyatt M P, Sutherland DH. Femoral anteversion and neck-shaft angle in children with cerebral palsy. Clin Orthop 1999;364:194-204.
30. Burr DB, Cook LT, Martin NL, Asher M. Measurement accuracy of proximal femoral geometry using biplanar radiography. J Pediatr Orthop 1981;1:171-9.
31. Kay RM, Jaki KA, Skaggs DL. The effect of femoral rotation on the projected femoral neck-shaft angle. J Pediatr Orthop 2000;20:736-9.
32. Anglin C, Masri BA, Tonetti J, Hodgson AJ, Greidanus NV. Hip resurfacing femoral neck fracture influenced by valgus placement. Clin Orthop 2007;465:71-9.
33. Davis ET, Olsen M, Zdero R, Waddell JP, Schemitsch EH. Femoral component alignment and the risk of femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2007 Annual Meeting Podium Presentations. Podium No 127. http://www3.aaos.org/education/current/aumt2007/ podium/podium.cfm?Prevent=127 (date last accessed 14 November 2008).
34. Richards CJ, Giannitsios D, Huk OL, et al. Risk of periprosthetic femoral neck fracture after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: valgus compared with anatomic alignment: a biomechanical and clinical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008;90-A:96-101.
35. No authors listed. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry 2007. http://www.aoa.org.av/docs/njavep07.pdf (date last accessed 14 November 2008).
36. Cobb J P, Kannan V, Brust K, Thevendran G. Navigation reduces the learning curve in resurfacing total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2007;463:90-7.
37. Haspl M, Bilic R. Assessment of femoral neck-shaft and antetorsion angles. Int Orthop 1996;20:363-6.
38. Yoshioka Y, Siu D, Cooke TD. The anatomy and functional axes of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1987;69-A:873-80.
39. Olsen M, Davis ET, Gallie PA, Waddell J P, Schemitsch EH. The reliability of radiographic assessment of femoral neck-shaft and implant angulation in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008; Epub.