Feminist perspectives on talent development: A research-based conception of giftedness in women

Conceptions of Giftedness: Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 217-245

  Reis, Sally M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349610143     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511610455.014     Document Type: Chapter

References (84)

1. Ajzenberg-Selove, F. (1994). A matter of choices: Memoirs of a female physicist. Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
2. Antler, J. (1987). Lucy Sprague Mitchell. New Haven: Yale University Press.
3. Arnold, K. D. (1995). Lives of promise. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Arnold, K. D., & Denny, T. (1985, April). The lives of academic achievers: The career aspiration of male and female high school valedictorians and salutatorians. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
5. Arnold, K. D., Noble, K. D., & Subotnik, R. F. (1996). Remarkable women: Perspectives on female talent development. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
6. Axelrod, T. (1988). Patently successful. Ms., 16(10), 44-45.
7. Baer, J. (1997). Gender differences in the effects of anticipated evaluation of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 10(1), 25-31.
8. Bateson, M. C. (1990). Composing a life. New York. Plume.
9. Belkin, L. (2003, October 23). The opt-out revolution. New York Times Magazine, 42-47, 58, 85-86.
10. Berlin, I. (1953). The hedgehog and the fox. New York: Simon & Schuster.
11. Burke, R. J. (2001a). Managerial women’s career experiences, satisfaction, and wellbeing: A five-country study. Cross-Cultural Management, 8(3/4), 117-133.
12. Burke, R. J. (2001b).Women in management: Cross-cultural research. Cross-Cultural Management, 8(3/4), 3-10.
13. Burton, L. J. (2002). Talent development in female Olympians:Aphenomenological approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation: University of Connecticut, Storrs.
14. Callahan, C. M. (1979). The gifted and talented woman. In A. H. Passow (Ed.), The gifted and talented (pp. 401-423). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
15. Callahan, C. M., Cunningham, C. M., & Plucker, J. A. (1994). Foundations for the future: The socio-emotional development of gifted, adolescent women. Roeper Review, 17(2), 99-105.
16. Cattell, J. M. (1903). A statistical study of eminent men. Popular Science Monthly, 62, 359-377.
17. Dash, J. (1973). A life of one’s own: Three gifted women and the men they married. New York: Paragon.
18. Dash, J. (1988). A life of one’s own. New York: Paragon.
19. Diamond, A. (1986). Guests at the table: Feminists and contracts. Thought and Action, 2, 123-34.
20. Gabor, A. (1995). Einstein’s wife:Work and marriage in the lives of five great twenty-first century women. New York: Viking.
21. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Gruber, H. E. (1986). The self-construction of the extraordinary. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 247-260). New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Hardwick, J. (1990). An immodest violet. London: Andre Deutsch.
24. Helson, R. (1996). In search of the creative personality. Creativity Research Journal, 9(4), 295-306.
25. Hollinger, C. L., & Fleming, E. S. (1988). Gifted and talented young women: Antecedents and correlates of life satisfaction. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32(2), 254-260.
26. Hutchinson, E. J. (1930).Women and the Ph.D. Greensboro, NC: College forWomen.
27. Kennedy, C. J., & McConnell, M. (2001). Generally speaking. New York: Warner.
28. Kerr, B. A. (1985). Smart girls, gifted women. Columbus, OH: Ohio Psychology.
29. Kirschenbaum, R. J., & Reis, S. M. (1997). Conflicts in creativity: Talented female artists. Creativity Research Journal, 10(2&3), 251-263.
30. Knights, D., & Richards, W. (2003). Sex discrimination in UK academia.Gender, Work, and Organization, 10(2), 213-238.
31. Lehman, H. C. (1953). Age and achievement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32. Lerner, G. (1993). The creation of feminist consciousness. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Lindauer, M. S. (1992). Creativity in aging artists. Creativity Research Journal, 5(3), 211-231.
34. Linehan, M. (2001). Women international managers: The European experience. Cross-Cultural Management, 8(3/4), 68-84.
35. List, K., & Renzulli, J. (1991). Creative women’s developmental patterns through age thirty-five. Gifted Education International, 7(3), 114-122.
36. McLeish, J. A. B. (1976). The Ulyssean adult: Creative in the middle and later years. New York: McGraw-Hill.
37. Miller, J. B. (1976). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon.
38. Nelson, D. L., & Burke, R. J. (Eds.). (2002). Gender, work stress, and health. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
39. Noble, K., Subotnik, R., & Arnold, K. (1996). A new model for adult female talent development:Asynthesis of perspectives fromremarkable women. In K. Arnold, K. Noble, & R. Subotnik (Eds.), Remarkable women: Perspectives on female talent development. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
40. Ochse, R. (1991). Why there were relatively few eminent women creators. Journal of Creative Behavior, 25(4), 334-343.
41. O’Connell, A. N., & Russo, N. F. (1983). Models of achievement: Reflections of eminent women in psychology. New York: Columbia University Press.
42. Oden, M. H. (1968). The fulfillment of promise. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 77(1), 3-93
43. O’Donovan-Polter, S. (2001). The scales of success: Constructions of life-career success of eminentmenandwomenlawyers. Toronto, Canada: University ofToronto Press.
44. Omar, A., & Davidson, M. J. (2001).Women in management: A comparative crosscultural overview. Cross-Cultural Management, 8(3/4), 35-67.
45. Oppenheimer, J. (1988). Private demons: The life of Shirley Jackson. New York: Ballantine.
46. Piirto, J. (1991). Why are there so few? (creative women: visual artists, mathematicians, musicians). Roeper Review, 13(3), 142-147.
47. Reis, S. M. (1987). We can’t change what we don’t recognize: Understanding the special needs of gifted females. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 83-88.
48. Reis, S. M. (1995). Talent ignored, talent diverted: The cultural context underlying giftedness in females. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 162-170.
49. Reis, S. M. (1996). Older women’s reflections on eminence: Obstacles and opportunities. In K. D. Arnold, K. D. Noble, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Remarkable women: Perspectives on female talent development (pp. 149-168). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
50. Reis, S. M. (1998). Work left undone. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
51. Reis, S. M. (2001). External barriers experienced by gifted and talented girls and women. Gifted Child Today, 24(4), 26-35, 65.
52. Reis, S. M. (2002a). Internal barriers, personal issues, and decisions faced by gifted and talented females. Gifted Child Today, 25(1), 14-28.
53. Reis, S. M. (2002b). Toward a theory of creativity in diverse creative women. Creativity Research Journal, 14(3-4), 305-316.
54. Reis, S. M., Hebert, T. P., Diaz, E. I., Maxfield, L. R., & Ratley, M. E. (1995). Case studies of talented students who achieve and underachieve in an urban high school (Research Monograph 95114). Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center for the Gifted and Talented.
55. Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Re-examining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180-184, 261.
56. Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53-92). New York: Cambridge University Press.
57. Renzulli, J. S. (1991). The national research center on the gifted and talented: The dream, the design, and the destination. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35(2), 73-80.
58. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
59. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
60. Rimm, S., Rimm-Kaufman, S., & Rimm, I. (1999). See Jane win. New York: Crown.
61. Roberts, T. (1991). Gender and the influence of evaluations on self-assessments in achievement settings. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 297-308.
62. Roberts, T., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1994). Gender comparisons in responsiveness to others’ evaluations in achievement settings. Psychology ofWomen Quarterly, 18, 221-240.
63. Roscher, N. (1987). Chemistry’s creative women. Journal of Chemical Education, 56(4), 748-752.
64. Schneidman, E. (1989). The Indian summer of life: A preliminary study of septuagenarians. American Psychologist, 44, 684-694.
65. Sears, R. (1977). Sources of satisfactions of Terman’s gifted men. American Psychologist, 32,119-128.
66. Simonton, D. K. (1975). Sociocultural context of individual creativity: A transhistorical time-series analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1119-1133.
67. Simonton, D. K. (1977). Creative productivity, age, and stress: A biographical timeseries analysis of 10 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 791-804.
68. Simonton, D. K. (1984). Artistic creativity and interpersonal relations across and within generations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1273-1286.
69. Simonton, D. K. (1988). Age and outstanding achievement: What do we know after a century of research? Psychological Bulletin, 104, 251-267.
70. Simonton, D. K. (1989). The swan-song phenomenon: Last-work effects for 172 classical composers. Psychology and Aging, 4, 42-47.
71. Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
72. Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triarchic theory of intellectual giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 233-243). New York: Cambridge University Press.
73. Sternberg, R. J. (1999). The theory of successful intelligence. Review of General Psychology, 3, 292-316.
74. Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.). (1986). Conceptions of giftedness. New York: Cambridge University Press.
75. Sternberg, R. J., & Gregorenko, E. L. (2002). The theory of successful intelligence as a basis for gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46(4), 265-277.
76. Subotnik, R., & Arnold, K. (1995). Passing through the gates: Career establishment of talented women scientists. Roeper Review, 13(3), 55-61.
77. Tannenbaum, A. J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. New York: Macmillan.
78. Tannenbaum, A. J. (1991). The social psychology of giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 27-44). Boston: Allyn&Bacon.
79. Vance, C. M., & Paik, Y. (2001). Where do American women face their biggest obstacle to expatriate success? Back in their own backyard. Cross-Cultural Management, 8(3/4), 98-116.
80. Varma, A., & Stroh, L. K. (2001). Different perspectives on selection for international assignments: The impact of LMX and gender. Cross-Cultural Management, 8(3/4), 85-97.
81. Wallace, T., & Walberg, H. (1995). Girls who became famous literalists of the imagination. Roeper Review, 13(3), 24-27.
82. Wasserman, E. (2000). The door in the dream: Conversations with eminent women in science. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry.
83. Winstone, H. V. F. (1978). Gertrude Bell. New York: Quartet.
84. Woolf, V. (1957). A room of one’s own. New York: Harcourt Brace.