Toward a theory of creativity in diverse creative women

Creativity Research Journal

Volumn 14, Issue 3-4, 2002, Pages 305-316

  Reis, Sally M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 11244329471     PISSN: 10400419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15326934CRJ1434_2     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Ajzenberg-Selove, F. (1994). A matter of choices: Memoirs of a female physicist. Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
2. Arnold, K. D. (1995). Lives of promise. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Arnold, K. D., & Denny, T. (1985). The lives of academic achievers: The career aspiration of male and female high school valedictorians and salutatorians. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
4. Axelrod, T. (1988). Patently successful. Ms., 16(10), 44-45.
5. Baer, J. (1997). Gender differences in the effects of anticipated evaluation of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 25-31.
6. Bateson, M. C. (1990). Composing a life. New York. Plume.
7. Beck, M., Kantrowski, B., & Beachy, L. (1990, July 16). Trading places, Newsweek, 48-54.
8. Bell, L. A. (1989). Something's wrong here and it's not me: Challenging the dilemmas that block girls' success. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 12, 118-130.
9. Block, J. H. (1982). Sex role identity and ego development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Callahan, C. M. (1979). The gifted and talented woman. In A. H. Passow (Ed.), The gifted and talented (pp. 401-423). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
11. Callahan, C. M., Cunningham, C. M., & Plucker, J. A. (1994). Foundations for the future: The socio-emotional development of gifted, adolescent women. Roeper Review, 17, 99-105.
12. Cattell, J. M. (1903). A statistical study of eminent men. Popular Science Monthly, 62, 359-377.
13. Cramer, R. H. (1989). Attitudes of gifted boys and girls toward math: A qualitative study. Roeper Review, 11, 128-133.
14. Dash, J. (1988). A life of one's own. New York: Paragon House.
15. Diamond, A. M. (1986). The life-cycle research productivity of mathematicians and scientists. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 520-525.
16. Gabor, A. (1995). Einstein's wife: Work and marriage in the lives of five great twenty-first century women. New York: Viking/ Penguin.
17. Gates, E. (1994). Why have there been no great women composers? Psychological theories, past and present. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 28(2), 27-34.
18. Helson, R. (1996). In search of the creative personality. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 295-306.
19. Hollinger, C. L., & Fleming, E. S. (1988). Gifted and talented young women: Antecedents and correlates of life satisfaction. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 254-260.
20. Huyck, M. H. (1990). Gender differences in aging. In J. Biren & W. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (3rd ed., pp. 120-134). New York: Academic.
21. Kerr, B. A. (1985). Smart girls, gifted women. Columbus: Ohio Psychology Publishing.
22. Kirschenbaum, R. J., & Reis, S. M. (1997). Conflicts in creativity: Talented female artists. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 251-263.
23. Kramer, L. R. (1991). The social construction of ability perceptions: An ethnographic study of gifted adolescent girls. Journal of Early Women in Culture and Society, 16, 158-172.
24. Kuebli, J., & Fivush, R. (1992). Gender differences in parent-child conversations about past emotions. Sex Roles, 27, 683-698.
25. Lerner, G. (1993). The creation of feminist consciousness. New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Leroux, J. A. (1988). Voices from the classroom: Academic and social self-concepts of gifted adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 11(3), 3-18.
27. Lindauer, M. S. (1992). Creativity in aging artists: Contributions from the humanities to the psychology of old age. Creativity Research Journal, 5, 211-231.
28. List, K., & Renzulli, J. (1991). Creative women's developmental patterns through age thirty-five. Gifted Education International, 7, 114-122.
29. McLeish, J. A. B. (1976). The Ulyssean adult: Creativity in the middle and later years. New York: McGraw-Hill/Ryerson.
30. Miller, J. B. (1976). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon.
31. Noble, K. D. (1989). Counseling gifted women: Becoming the heroes of our own stories. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 12, 131-141.
32. Ochse, R. (1991). Why there were relatively few eminent women creators. Journal of Creative Behavior, 25, 334-343.
33. Piirto, J. (1991). Why are there so few? (creative women: visual artists, mathematicians, musicians). Roeper Review, 13, 142-147.
34. Reis, S. M. (1987). We can't change what we don't recognize: Understanding the special needs of gifted females. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 83-88.
35. Reis, S. M. (1995). Talent ignored, talent diverted: The cultural context underlying giftedness in females. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 162-170.
36. Reis, S. M. (1996). Older women's reflections on eminence: Obstacles, and opportunities. In K. D. Arnold, K. D. Noble, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Remarkable women: Perspectives on female talent development (pp. 149-168). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
37. Reis, S. M. (1998). Work left undone. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning.
38. Reis, S. M., & Callahan, C. M. (1989). Gifted females: They've come a long way - or have they? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 12, 99-117.
39. Richards, R. (1996). Beyond Piaget: Accepting divergent, chaotic, and creative thought. In M. Runco (Ed.), Creativity from childhood through adulthood: The developmental issues. New directions for child development (No. 72, pp. 67-86). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
40. Roberts, T. (1991). Gender and the influence of evaluations on self-assessments in achievement settings. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 297-308.
41. Roberts, T., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1994). Gender comparisons in responsiveness to others' evaluations in achievement settings. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 221-240.
42. Roscher, N. (1987). Chemistry's creative women. Journal of Chemical Education, 56, 748-752.
43. Runco, M. A. (1991). Divergent thinking. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
44. Schneidman, E. (1989). The Indian summer of life: A preliminary study of septuagenarians. American Psychologist, 44, 684-694.
45. Schwartz, L. A., & Markham, W. T. (1985). Sex stereotyping in children's achievements. Sex Roles, 12, 157-170.
46. Sears, R. (1977). Sources of satisfactions of Terman's gifted men. American Psychologist, 32, 119-128.
47. Simonton, D. K. (1978). Creative productivity, age, and stress: A biographical time-series analysis of 10 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 791-804.
48. Simonton, D. K. (1984). Artistic creativity and interpersonal relations across and within generations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1273-1286.
49. Simonton, D. K. (1989). The swan-song phenomenon: Last-work effects for 172 classical composers. Psychology and Aging, 4, 42-47.
50. Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, Personal, Developmental, and Social Aspects. American Psychologist, 55, 151-158.
51. Sloane, K. D., & Sosniak, L. A. (1985). The development of accomplished sculptures. In B. Bloom (Ed.), The development of talent in young people (pp. 90-138). New York: Ballantine.
52. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd. New York: The Free Press.
53. Subotnik, R., & Arnold, K. (1995). Passing through the gates: Career establishment of talented women scientists. Roeper Review, 13, 55-61.
54. VanTassel-Baska, J. (1995). A study of life themes in Charlotte Bronte and Virginia Wolf. Roeper Review, 13(3), 14-19.
55. Wallace, T., & Wahlberg, H. (1995). Girls who became famous literalists of the imagination. Roeper Review, 13(3), 24-27.
56. Woolf, V. (1957). A room of one's own. New York: Harcourt Brace.