360-Degree feedback: Possibilities for assessment of the ACGME core competencies for emergency medicine residents

Academic Emergency Medicine

Volumn 9, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 1300-1304

  Rodgers, Kevin G ^a   Manifold, Craig ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

360 degree feedback; Core competencies; Performance assessment; Residents

Indexed keywords

ACCREDITATION; COMPETENCE; CONFERENCE PAPER; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; PEER REVIEW; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; RESIDENT;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; PROGRAM EVALUATION;

EID: 0036844926     PISSN: 10696563     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1197/aemj.9.11.1300     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Gray JD. Global rating scales in residency education. Acad Med. 1996; 71(1, Jan suppl):S55-S63.
2. Klessig J, Robbins AS, Wieland D, Rubenstein L. Evaluating humanistic attributes of internal medicine residents. J Gen Intern Med. 1989; 4:514-21.
3. Goldman RL, Ciesco E. Improving peer review: Alternatives to unstructured judgments by a single reviewer. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1996; 22:762-9.
4. Gordon MJ. Cutting the Gordian knot: A two part approach to the evaluation and professional development of residents. Acad Med. 1997; 72:876-80.
5. Littlefield J, Terrell C. Improving the quality of resident performance appraisals. Acad Med. 1997; 72(10, Oct RIME):S45-S47.
6. Callahan M, Fein O, Battleman D. A practice profiling system for residents. Acad Med. 2002; 77:34-9.
7. Butterfield PS, Mazzaferri EL. A new rating form for use by nurses in assessing residents' humanistic behavior. J Gen Intern Med. 1991; 6:155-61.
8. Matthews DA, Feinstein AR. A new instrument for patients' ratings of physician performance in the hospital setting. J Gen Intern Med. 1989; 4:15-22.
9. Van Rosendaal GM, Jennett PA. Comparing peer and faculty evaluations in an internal medicine residency. Acad Med. 1994; 69:299-303.
10. Butterfield PS, Mazzaferri EL, Sachs LA. Nurses as evaluators of the humanistic behavior of internal medicine residents. J Med Educ. 1987; 62:842-9.
11. Goldman RL. The reliability of peer assessments. A metaanalysis. Eval Health Prof. 1994; 17:3-21.
12. Ramsey PG, Carline JD, Blank LL, Wenrich MD. Feasibility of hospital-based use of peer ratings to evaluate the performances of practicing physicians. Acad Med. 1996; 71:364-70.
13. Ramsey PG, Wenrich MD, Carline JD, et al. Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance. JAMA. 1993; 269:1655-60.
14. Dalton M. Multi-rater feedback and conditions for change. Consult Psychol J Pract Res. 1996; 48(1):12-6.
15. Arnold EL, Blank LL, Race EH, Cipparrone N. Can professionalism be measured? The development of a scale for use in the medical environment. Acad Med. 1998; 73:1119-21.
16. Southgate L, Cox J, David T, et al. The general medical council's performance procedures: Peer review of performance in the workplace. Med Educ. 2001; 35(suppl 1):9-19.
17. Rosenberg ME, Watson K, Paul J, et al. Development and implementation of a web-based evaluation system for an internal medicine residency program. Acad Med. 2001; 76:92-5.
18. Rudy DW, Fejfar MC, Griffith CH, Wilson JF. Self and peer assessment in a first-year communication and interviewing course. Eval Health Prof. 2001; 24:436-45.
19. Atwater LE, Yammarino FJ. Self-other rating agreement: A review and model. Res Person Hum Resources Manage. 1997; 15:141-64.
20. Romano C. Fear of feedback. Manage Rev. 1993; Dec:38-41.
21. DeSimone R. Establishing the link: Relating a 360-degree management assessment and development process to the bottom line. Health Care Superv. 1998; 17(1):31-6.
22. Hoffman R. Ten reasons you should be using 360-degree feedback. HR Magazine. 1995; Apr:82-5.
23. TEAMS, Inc. Multi-source, 360-degree feedback survey results. Tempe, AZ: TEAMS, Inc., Oct 1995.
24. Van Velsor E, Leslie JB, Fleenor JW. Choosing 360: A Guide to Evaluating Multi-Rater Feedback Instruments for Management Development. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership, 1997.
25. Vinson MN. The pros and cons of 360-degree feedback: Making it work. Training and Development. 1996; Apr:11-2.