A quantitative methodology for acquiring engineering characteristics in PPHOQ

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 187-193

  Li, Yanlai ^a   Tang, Jiafu ^a   Luo, Xinggang ^a   Yao, Jianming ^b   Xu, Jie ^c  

^a KEY LABORATORY OF INTEGRATED AUTOMATION OF PROCESS INDUSTRY   (China)

^b Renmin Business School   (China)

^c NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Engineering characteristics; House of quality; Quality function deployment (QFD); Rough set

Indexed keywords

CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS; ENGINEERING CHARACTERISTICS; HOUSE OF QUALITY; PRODUCT PLANNING; QUANTITATIVE METHODOLOGY; ROUGH SET;

BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESES; DECISION MAKING; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY MEASUREMENT; FUZZY SETS; HOUSES; MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS; QUALITY CONTROL; ROUGH SET THEORY; WASHERS;

QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT;

EID: 70349451317     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Akao Y., and Mazur G.H. The leading edge in QFD: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 20 1 (2003) 20-35
2. Armacost R.L., Componation P.J., Mullens M.A., and Swart W.W. An AHP framework for prioritizing customer requirements in QFD: An industrialised housing application. IIE Transactions 26 1 (1994) 72-79
3. Bai H., and Kwong C.K. Inexact genetic algorithm approach to target values setting of engineering requirements in QFD. International Journal Production Research 41 16 (2003) 3861-3881
4. Chan L.K., and Wu M.L. Quality function deployment: A comprehensive review of its concepts and methods. Quality Engineering 15 1 (2002) 23-35
5. Chan L.K., and Wu M.L. Quality function deployment: A literature review. European Journal Operational Research 143 (2002) 463-497
6. Chan L.K., and Wu M.L. A systematic approach to quality function deployment with a full illustrative example. Omega 33 1 (2005) 119-139
7. Chin K.S., Wang Y.M., Yang J.B., and Poon K.K.G. An evidential reasoning based approach for quality function deployment under uncertainty. Expert Systems with Application 36 3P1 (2009) 5684-5694
8. Ertay T., Kahraman C., and Ruan D. Quality function deployment implementation based on analytic network process with linguistic data: An application in automotive industry. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 16 1 (2005) 221-232
9. Fung R.Y.K., Tang J.F., Tu Y.L., and Wang D. Product design resource optimization using a non-linear fuzzy quality function deployment model. International Journal Production Research 40 3 (2002) 585-599
10. Hauser J.R., and Clausing D. The house of quality. Harvard Business Reviews 66 3 (1988) 53-73
11. Ho E.S.S.A., Lai Y.J., and Chang S.I. An integrated group decision-making approach to quality function deployment. IIE Transactions 31 (1999) 553-567
12. Karsak E.E. Fuzzy multiple objective decision making approach to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment. International Journal Production Research 42 18 (2004) 3957-3974
13. Karsak E.E., Sozer S., and Alptekin S.E. Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach. Computers and Industrial Engineering 44 1 (2002) 171-190
14. Kim H.K., Lee M.S., and Kim K.J. A systematic method for generating engineering characteristic candidates in quality function deployment. International Journal of Industrial Engineering 14 2 (2007) 179-187
15. Kim K.J., Kim D.H., and Min D.K. Robust QFD: Framework and a case study. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 23 1 (2007) 31-44
16. Kim K.J., Moskowitz H., Dhingra A., and Evans G. Fuzzy multicriteria models for quality function deployment. European Journal Operational Research 121 (2000) 504-518
17. Kuo T.C., Wu H.H., and Shieh J.I. Integration of environmental considerations in quality function deployment by using fuzzy logic. Expert Systems with Applications 36 3P2 (2009) 7148-7156
18. Kwong C.K., and Bai H. A fuzzy AHP approach to the determination of importance weights of customer requirements in quality function deployment. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 13 5 (2002) 367-377
19. Kwong C.K., and Bai H. Determining the importance weights for the customer requirements in QFD using a fuzzy AHP with an extent analysis approach. IIE Transactions 35 2 (2003) 619-626
20. Li Y.L., Tang J.F., Luo X.G., and Xu J. An integrated method of rough set, Kano's model and AHP for rating customer requirements' final importance. Expert Systems with Application 36 3 (2009) 7045-7053
21. Liu X.Q., Noguchi K., and Zhou W.H. Requirement acquisition, analysis, and synthesis in quality function deployment. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Application 9 1 (2003) 24-36
22. Luo, X. G., Tang J. F., Wang, D. W. (2007). An optimization method for components selection using quality function deployment. International Journal of Advance Manufacture Technology, doi:10.1007/s00170-007-1206-6.
23. Min D.K., and Kim K.J. An extended QFD planning model for selecting design requirements with longitudinal effect consideration. Expert Systems with Applications 35 4 (2008) 1546-1554
24. Pawlak Z. Rough sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Science 11 2 (1982) 341-356
25. Pawlak Z., and Skowron A. Rudiments of rough sets. Information Science 177 (2007) 3-27
26. Pawlak Z., and Skowron A. Rough sets and Boolean reasoning. Information Science 177 (2007) 41-73
27. Raharjo, H., Brombacher, A. C., Xie, M. (2008). Dealing with subjectivity in early product design phase: A systematic approach to exploit quality function deployment potentials. Computer and Industrial Engineering, doi:10.1016/j.cie.2007.12.012.
28. Raharjo X., Xie M., and Brombacher A.C. Prioritizing quality characteristic in dynamic quality function deployment. International Journal Production Research 44 23 (2006) 5005-5018
29. Reich Y., and Paz A. Managing product quality, risk, and resources through resource quality function deployment. Journal of Engineering Design 19 3 (2008) 249-267
30. Tang J.F., Fung R.Y.K., Xu D., and Wang D.W. A new approach to quality function deployment with financial consideration. Computer and Operational Research 29 11 (2002) 1447-1463
31. Tang J.F., Zhan Y.E., Tu Y.L., Chen Y.Z., and Dong Y. Synthesis, evaluation, and selection of parts design scheme in supplier involved product development. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications 13 (2005) 277-289
32. Wasserman G.S. On how to prioritize design requirements during the QFD planning process. IIE Transactions 25 3 (1993) 59-65
33. Wu, H. H., Shieh, J. I. (2007). Using a Markov chain model in quality function deployment[J]. Quality and Quantity, doi:10.1007/s11135-007-9079-1.
34. Xie M., Goh T.N., and Wang H. A study of the sensitivity of customer voice in QFD analysis. International Journal of Industrial Engineering 5 4 (1998) 301-307
35. Xie M., Tan K.C., and Goh T.N. Advanced QFD applications (2003), ASQ Quality Press, Milwaukee, Wisconsin