Naturalizing Perception: Developing the Gibsonian Approach to Perception along Evolutionary Lines

Theory & Psychology

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 363-389

  Withagen, Rob ^a   Chemero, Anthony ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (United States)

^b MARSHALL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

ecological psychology; evolutionary psychology; information; naturalism; perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349325813     PISSN: 09593543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0959354309104159     Document Type: Article

References (109)

1. Amazeen, E.L., & Turvey, M.T. (1996). Weight perception and the haptic size-weight illusion are functions of the inertia tensor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 213-232.
2. Barwise, J., & Perry, J. (1981). Situations and attitudes. Journal of Philosophy, 77, 668-691.
3. Barwise, J., & Perry, J. (1983). Situations and attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Beard, A.S., & Blaser, M.J. (2002). The ecology of height: The effect of microbial transmission on human height. Perspectives in Biology & Medicine, 45, 475-498.
5. Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6. Burton, G., & Turvey, M.T. (1990). Perceiving the lengths of rods that are held but not wielded. Ecological Psychology, 2, 295-324.
7. Cabe, P.A. (2001). Absolutist array specification and species survival: An ecological perspective on ecological perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 217.
8. Carello, C., Thuot, S., Anderson, K.L., & Turvey, M.T. (1999). Perceiving the sweet spot. Perception, 28, 307-320.
9. Carello, C., & Turvey, M.T. (2004). Physics and psychology of the muscle sense. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 25-28.
10. Cesari, P., Formenti, F., & Olivato, P. (2003). A common perceptual parameter for stair climbing for children, young and old adults. Human Movement Science, 22, 111-124.
11. Chemero, A. (2003). Information for perception and information processing. Minds and Machines, 13, 577-588.
12. Chemero, A. (2006). Information and direct perception: A new approach. In P. Farias & J. Queiroz (Eds.), Advanced issues on cognitive science and semiotics (pp. 75-93). Maastricht, The Netherlands: Shaker.
13. Chemero, A. (in press). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and environment together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Cutting, J.E. (1982). Two ecological perspectives: Gibson vs. Turvey and Shaw. American Journal of Psychology, 95, 199-222.
16. Cutting, J.E. (1986). Perception with an eye for motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Cutting, J.E. (1991). Four ways to reject directed perception. Ecological Psychology, 6, 185-204.
18. Darwin, C. (1985). On the origin of species by means of natural selection. London: Penguin. (Original work published 1859)
19. Dawkins, R. (1982). The extended phenotype: The gene as the unit of selection. Oxford, UK: Freeman.
20. Eldredge, N., & Gould, S.J. (1972). Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism. In T. M. Schopf (Ed.), Models in paleobiology (pp. 82-115). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
21. Endler, J.A. (1986). Natural selection in the wild. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22. Fajen, B.R. (2005). Perceiving possibilities for action: On the necessity of calibration and perceptual learning for the visual guidance of action. Perception, 34, 717-740.
23. Fajen, B.R., & Devaney, M.C. (2006). Learning to control collisions: The role of perceptual attunement and action boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 300-313.
24. Fajen, B.R., & Warren, W.H. (2003). Behavioral dynamics of steering, obstacle avoidance, and route selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 343-362.
25. Fodor, J.A. (1980). Methodological solipsism considered as a research strategy in cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 63-109.
26. Gibson, J.J. (1957). Survival in a world of probable object. Contemporary Psychology, 2, 33-35.
27. Gibson, J.J. (1959). Perception as a function of stimulation. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (pp. 456-501). New York: McGraw-Hill.
28. Gibson, J.J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
29. Gibson, J.J. (1967). Autobiography. In E.G. Boring & G. Lindzey (Eds.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. 5, pp. 127-143). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
30. Gibson, J.J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. (Original work published 1979)
31. Glotzbach, P., & Heft, H. (1982). Ecological and phenomenological contributions of the psychology of perception. Nous, 16, 108-121.
32. Goldfield, E.C. (1995). Emergent forms: Origin and early development of human action and perception. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Gottlieb, G. (1998). Normally occurring environmental and behavioral influences on gene activity: From central dogma to probabilistic epigenesis. Psychological Review, 105, 792-802.
34. Gould, S.J. (1997). The exaptive excellence of spandrels as a term and prototype. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94, 10750-10755.
35. Gould, S.J., & Lewontin, R. (1978). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist program. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B205, 581-598.
36. Hatfield, G. (1990). The natural and the normative: Theories of spatial perception from Kant to Helmholtz. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Heft, H. (2001). Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the legacy of William James's radical empiricism. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Heider, F. (1959a). Thing and medium. In On perception, event structure, and psychological environment (pp. 35-52). New York: International University Press. (Original work published 1927)
39. Heider, F. (1959b). The function of the perceptual system. In On perception, event structure, and psychological environment (pp. 35-52). New York: International University Press. (Original work published 1930)
40. Holt, E.B. (1915). The Freudian wish and its place in ethics. New York: Holt.
41. Hull, D.L. (1965). The effect of essentialism and taxonomy. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 15, 314-326.
42. Hull, D.L. (1978). A matter of individuality. Philosophy of Science, 45, 335-360.
43. Jacobs, D.M., & Michaels, C.F. (2002). On the apparent paradox of learning and realism. Ecological Psychology, 14, 127-139.
44. Jacobs, D.M., & Michaels, C.F. (2007). Direct learning. Ecological Psychology, 19, 321-349.
45. Jacobs, D.M., Michaels, C.F., & Runeson, S. (2000). Learning to perceive the relative mass of colliding balls: The effects of ratio-scaling and feedback. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1332-1340.
46. Jacobs, D.M., Runeson, S., & Michaels, C.F. (2001). Learning to perceive the relative mass of colliding balls in globally and locally constrained task ecologies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1019-1038.
47. James, W. (1950). The principles of psychology. New York: Dover. (Original work published in 1890)
48. Keijzer, F. (2001). Representation and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. Kelso, J.A.S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
50. Kirsh, D. (1991). Today the earwig, tomorrow man? Artificial Intelligence, 47, 161-184.
51. Kugler, P.N., & Turvey, M.T. (1987). Information, natural law, and the self-assembly of rhythmic movement. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Lewontin, R.C. (1970). The units of selection. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1, 1-18.
53. Lewontin, R.C. (1984). The structure of evolutionary genetics. In E. Sober (Ed.), Conceptual issues in evolutionary biology (pp. 3-13). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. Lombardo, T.J. (1987). The reciprocity of perceiver and environment: The evolution of James J. Gibson's ecological psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Looren de Jong, H. (1995). Ecological psychology and naturalism: Heider, Gibson, and Marr. Theory & Psychology, 5, 251-269.
56. Looren de Jong, H. (1997). Some remarks on a relational concept of mind. Theory & Psychology, 7, 147-172.
57. Looren de Jong, H., & van der Steen, W.J. (1998). Biological thinking in evolutionary psychology: Rockbottom or quicksand? Philosophical Psychology, 11, 183-205.
58. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. New York: Freeman.
59. Mayr, E. (1994). Typological versus population thinking. In E. Sober (Ed.), Conceptual issues in evolutionary biology (pp. 157-160). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1975)
60. Mayr, E. (2002). What evolution is. London: Phoenix. (Original work published 2001)
61. Mayr, E. (2007). What makes biology unique? New York: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 2004)
62. Meijer, O.G. (1998). Een beetje uit de pas. Unpublished manuscript.
63. Meijsing, M. (1998). Where is meaning in this world? Perception in an evolutionary context. In T. Derksen (Ed.), The promise of evolutionary epistemology (pp. 81-99). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
64. Michaels, C.F. (2000). Information, perception, and action: What should ecological psychologists learn from Milner and Goodale (1995)? Ecological Psychology, 12, 241-258.
65. Michaels, C.F., & Beek, P.J. (1995). The state of ecological psychology. Ecological Psychology, 7, 259-278.
66. Michaels, C.F., & Carello, C. (1981). Direct perception. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
67. Michaels, C.F., & de Vries, M.M. (1998). Higher order and lower order variables in the visual perception of relative pulling force. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 526-546.
68. Michaels, C.F., Zeinstra, E., & Oudejans, R.R.D. (2001). Information and action in timing the punch of a falling ball. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 69-93.
69. Millikan, R.G. (2000). On clear and confused ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70. Müller, J. (2007). Elements of physiology (W. Baly, Trans.). Whitefish, MT: Kessinger. (Original work published 1838-40)
71. Oyama, S. (1985). The ontogeny of information: Developmental systems and evolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
72. Oyama, S. (2000). Evolution's eye: A systems view of the biology-culture divide. London: Duke University Press.
73. Oyama, S., Griffiths, P.E., & Gray, R.D. (Eds.). (2001). Cycles of contingency: Developmental systems and evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
74. Pittenger, J.B. (1989). Multiple sources of information: Threat of menace? ISEP Newsletter, 4, 4-6.
75. Port, R.F., & van Gelder, T. (Eds.). (1995). Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
76. Reed, E.S. (1982a). An outline of a theory of action systems. Journal of Motor Behavior, 14, 98-134.
77. Reed, E.S. (1982b). The corporeal ideas hypothesis and the origin of scientific psychology. Review of Metaphysics, 35, 731-752.
78. Reed, E.S. (1985). An ecological approach to the evolution of behavior. In T. Johnston & A. Pietrewicz (Eds.), Issues in the ecological study of learning (pp. 357-383). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
79. Reed, E.S. (1988). James J. Gibson and the psychology of perception. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
80. Reed, E.S. (1996). Encountering the world: Toward an ecological psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
81. Richards, R.J. (1987). Darwin and the emergence of evolutionary theories of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
82. Riley, M.A., & Turvey, M.T. (2001). Inertial constraints on limb proprioception are independent of visual calibration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 438-455.
83. Runeson, S. (1988). The distorted room illusion, equivalent configurations, and the specificity of static optic arrays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 295-304.
84. Runeson, S., Juslin, P., & Olsson, H. (2000). Visual perception of dynamic properties: Cue heuristic versus direct-perceptual competence. Psychological Review, 107, 525-555.
85. Shaw, R.E., & Kinsella-Shaw, J. (1988). Ecological mechanics: A physical geometry for intentional constraints. Human Movement Science, 7, 155-200.
86. Shaw, R.E., Turvey, M.T., & Mace, W.M. (1982). Ecological psychology: The consequence of a commitment to realism. In W. Weimer & D. Palermo (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic processes II (pp. 159-226). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
87. Sober, E. (1980). Evolution, population thinking, and essentialism. Philosophy of Science, 47, 350-383.
88. Sober, E. (1993). Philosophy of biology. Boulder, CO: Westview.
89. Solomon, H.Y., & Turvey, M.T. (1988). Haptically perceiving the distance reachable with hand-held objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 404-427.
90. Stoffregen, T.A., & Bardy, B.G. (2001). On specification and the senses. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 195-261.
91. Thelen, E., & Smith, L.B. (1994). A dynamical systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
92. Todd, J.T. (1981). Visual information about moving objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 795-810.
93. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990). On the universality of human nature and the uniqueness of the individual: The role of genetics and adaptation. Journal of Personality, 58, 17-67.
94. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J.H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind (pp. 19-136). New York: Oxford University Press.
95. Tresilian, J.R. (1999). Visually timed action: Time-out for “tau.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 301-310.
96. Turvey, M.T. (1990). The challenge of a physical account of action: A personal view. In H. T.A. Whiting, O.G. Meijer, & P.C.W. van Wieringen (Eds.), A natural-physical approach to movement control (pp. 57-93). Amsterdam: Free University Press.
97. Turvey, M.T., Burton, G., Amazeen, E., Butwill, M., & Carello, C. (1998). Perceiving the width and height of hand-held objects by dynamic touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 35-48.
98. Turvey, M.T., & Carello, C. (1995). Dynamic touch. In W. Epstein & S. Rogers (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition: Perception of space and motion (pp. 401-490). New York: Academic Press.
99. Turvey, M.T., & Kugler, P.N. (1984). A comment on equating information with symbol strings. American Journal of Physiology, 246, R925-R927.
100. Turvey, M.T., & Shaw, R.E. (1999). Ecological foundations of cognition: I. Symmetry and specificity of animal-environment systems. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6, 95-110.
101. Turvey, M.T., Shaw, R.E., Reed, E.D., & Mace, W.M. (1981) Ecological laws of perceiving and acting: In reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn. Cognition, 9, 237-304.
102. Turvey, M.T., Shockley, K., & Carello, C. (1999). Affordance, proper function, and the physical basis of perceived heaviness. Cognition, 73, B17-B28.
103. van de Langenberg, R., Kingma, I., & Beek, P.J. (2006). Mechanical invariants are implicated in dynamic touch as a function of their salience in the stimulus flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1093-1106.
104. van der Kamp, J., Savelsbergh, G.J.P., & Smeets, J.B.J. (1997). Multiple information sources in interceptive timing. Human Movement Science, 16, 787-821.
105. Vicente, K.J. (2003). Beyond the lens model and direct perception: Toward a broader ecological approach. Ecological Psychology, 15, 241-267.
106. Wilson, D.S. (1994). Adaptive genetic variation and human evolutionary psychology. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 219-135.
107. Withagen, R. (2004). The pickup of nonspecifying variables does not entail indirect perception. Ecological Psychology, 16, 237-253.
108. Withagen, R., & Michaels, C.F. (2005). The role of feedback information for calibration and attunement in perceiving length by dynamic touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1379-1390.
109. Withagen, R., & van Wermeskerken, M. (2009). Individual differences in learning to perceive length by dynamic touch: Evidence for variation in perceptual learning capactities. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 71, 64-75.