Towards understanding the specifics of cochlear hearing loss: A modelling approach

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 47, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2008, Pages

  Stenfelt, Stefan ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Anatomy and physiology; Hearing aids; Medical audiology; Middle ear; Otoacoustic emissions; Psychoacoustics hearing science

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; AUDIOGRAPHY; AUDITORY SYSTEM; AUDITORY SYSTEM FUNCTION; COCHLEA; COCHLEA POTENTIAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; DISEASE ACTIVITY; HAIR CELL; HEARING AID; INNER EAR; INNER EAR DISEASE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MODEL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; PRESSURE; REHABILITATION OF HEARING IMPAIRED; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; VIBRATION;

EID: 56549107252     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14992020802307396     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (62)

1. Aibara, R., Welsh, J.T., Puria, S. & Goode, R.L. 2001. Human middle-ear sound transfer function and cochlear input impedance. Hear Res, 152, 100-109.
2. Bagatto, M., Moodie, S., Scollie, S., Seewald, R., Moodie, S., et al. 2005. Clinical protocols for hearing instrument fitting in the desired sensation level method. Trends Amplif, 9, 199-226.
3. Bruce, I.C., Sachs, M.B. & Young, E.D. 2003. An auditory-periphery model of the effects of acoustic trauma on auditory nerve responses. J Acoust Soc Am, 113, 369-388.
4. Buus, S., Musch, H. & Florentine, M. 1998. On loudness at threshold. J Acoust Soc Am, 111, 1810-1818.
5. Byrne, D. & Dillon, H. 1986. The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid. Ear Hear, 7, 257-265.
6. Byrne, D., Dillion, H., Ching, T., Katsch, R. & Keidser, G. 2001. NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: Characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. J Am Acad Audiol, 12, 37-51.
7. Carney, L.H. 1993. A model for the responses of low-frequency auditory-nerve fibres in cat. J Acoust Soc Am, 93, 401-417.
8. Cheatham, M.A. & Dallos, P. 2000. The dynamic range of inner hair cell and organ of Corti responses. J Acoust Soc Am, 107, 1508-1520.
9. Cooper N.P. & Dong W. 2003. Baseline position shifts and mechanical compression in the apical turns of the cochlea. In: A.W. Gummer (ed.), Biophysics of the Cochlea, Singapore: World Scientific, 261-270.
10. de Boer, E. 1997. Classical and non-classical models of the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am, 101, 2148-2150.
11. Derleth, R.P., Dau, T. & Kollmeier, B. 2001. Modeling temporal and compressive properties of the normal and impaired auditory system. Hear Res, 159, 132-149.
12. Durrant, J.D., Wang, J., Ding, D.L. & Salvi, R.J. 1998. Are inner or outer hair cells the source of summating potentials recorded from the round window? J Acoust Soc Am, 104, 370-377.
13. Edwards, B. 2007. The future of hearing aid technology. Trends Amplif, 11, 31-45.
14. Elliott, S.J., Ku, E.M. & Lineton, B. 2007. A state space model for cochlear mechanics. J Acoust Soc Am, 122, 2759-2771.
15. Evans, B.N. & Dallos, P. 1993. Stereocilia displacement induced somatic motility of cochlear outer hair cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 90, 8247-8351.
16. Evans, B.N., Hallwort., R. & Dallos, P. 1991. Outer hair cell electromotility: The sensitivity and vulnerability of the DC component. Hear Res, 52, 288-304.
17. Fukazawa, T. 1997. A model of cochlear micromechanics. Hear Res, 113, 182-190.
18. Gates, G.A. & Mills, J.H. 2005. Presbycusis. Lancet, 366, 1111-1120.
19. Geisler, D.C. & Sang, C. 1995. A cochlear model using feed-forward outer-hair-cell forces. Hear Res, 86, 132-146.
20. Giguere, C. & Woodland, P.C. 1994. A computational model of the auditory periphery for speech and hearing research. I. Ascending path. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 331-342.
21. Glasberg, B.R. & Moore, B.C.J. 1990. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear Res, 47, 103-138.
22. Harding, G.W., Bohne, B.A. & Ahmad, M. 2002. DPOAE level shifts and ABR threshold shifts compared to detailed analysis of histopathological damage from noise. Hear Res, 174, 158-171.
23. Hato, N., Stenfelt, S. & Goode, R.L. 2003. Three-dimensional stapes footplate motion in human temporal bones. Audiol Neurootol, 8, 140-152.
24. Hinchcliffe, R. 2003. The threshold of hearing. In L Luxon (ed.), Textbook of Audiological Medicine - Clinical Aspects of Hearing and Balance. London: Martin Dunitz, pp. 213-247.
25. Huettel, L.G. & Collins, L.M. 2004. A theoretical analysis of normal and impaired hearing intensity discrimination. IEEE Trans Speech Audio Proc, 12, 323-333.
26. Johnson, T.A., Neel, S.T., Kopu, J.G., Dierkin, D.M., Ta, H., et al. 2007. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: Cochlear-source contributions and clinical test performance. J Acoust Soc Am, 122, 3539-3553.
27. Kistler, D.J. & Wightman, F.L. 1992. A model of head-related transfer functions based on principal components analysis and minimum-phase reconstruction. J Acoust Soc Am, 91, 1637-1647.
28. Liberman, M.C. & Dodds, L.W. 1984. Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves. Hear Res, 16, 55-74.
29. Lim, K.M. & Steele, C.R. 2002. A three-dimensional nonlinear active cochlear model analysed by the WKB-numeric method. Hear Res, 170, 190-205.
30. Liu, X.Z. & Yan, D. 2007. Aging and hearing loss. J Pathol, 211, 188-197.
31. Lopez-Poveda, E.A. & Meddis, R. 2001. A human nonlinear cochlear filterbank. J Acoust Soc Am, 110, 3107-3118.
32. Lyon, R.F. 1982. A computational model of filtering, detection, and compression in the cochlea. IEEE ICASSP, 82, 1282-1285.
33. Mauermann, M., Uppenkamp, S., van Hengel, P.W.J. & Kollmeier, B. 1999. Evidence for the distortion product frequency place as a source of distortion product emission (DPOAE) fine structure in humans. I. Fine structure and higher-order DPOAE as a function of the frequency ratio f2/f1. J Acoust Soc Am, 106, 3473-3483.
34. Meddis, R. 1988. Simulation of auditory-neural transduction: Further studies. J Acoust Soc Am, 83, 1056-1063.
35. Meddis, R. 2006. Auditory-nerve first-spike latency and auditory absolute threshold: A computer model. J Acoust Soc Am, 119, 406-417.
36. Mills, D.M. & Schmiedt, R.A. 2004. Metabolic presbycusis: Differential changes in auditory brainstem and otoacoustic emission responses with chronic furosemide application in the gerbil. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 5, 1-10.
37. Mills, D.M. 2006. Determining the cause of hearing loss: Differential diagnosis using a comparison of audiometric and otoacoustic emission responses. Ear Hear, 27, 508-525.
38. Neely, S.T., Gorga, M.P. & Dorn, P.A. 2003. Cochlear compression estimates from measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am, 114, 1499-1507.
39. Nelson, D.A., Schroder, A.C. &Wojtczak, M. 2001. A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 110, 2045-2064.
40. O'Connor, K.N. & Puria, S. 2008. Middle-ear circuit model parameters based on a population of human ears. J Acoust Soc Am, 123, 197-211.
41. Patuzzi, R. 1996. Cochlear micromechanics and macromechanics. In P. Dallos, A.N. Popper & R.R. Fay (eds.) The Cochlea. New York: Springer, pp. 186-257.
42. Pichora-Fuller, K.M., Schneider, B.A., MacDonald, E., Pass, H.E. & Brown, S. 2007. Temporal jitter disrupts speech intelligibility: A simulation of auditory aging. Hear Res, 223, 114-121.
43. Plack, C.J. & Oxenham, A.J. 2000. Basilar-membrane nonlinearity estimated by pulsation threshold. J Acoust Soc Am, 107, 501-507.
44. Reyes, S., Ding, D., Sun, W. & Salvi, R. 2001. Effect of inner and outer hair cell lesions on electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res, 158, 139-150.
45. Robles, L. & Ruggero, M.A. 2001. Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. Physiol Rev, 81, 1305-1352.
46. Ruggero, M.A., Rich, N.C., Recio, A., Narayan, S.S. & Robles, L. 1997. Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am, 101, 2151-2163.
47. Sachs, M.B., Bruce, I.C., Miller, R.L. & Young, E.D. 2002. Biological basis of hearing-aid design. Ann Biomed Eng, 30, 157-168.
48. Salvi, R.J., Ding, D., Wang, J. & Jiang, H.Y. 2000. A review of the effects of selective inner hair cell lesion on distortion product otoacoustic emissions, cochlear function and auditory evoked potentials. Noise Health, 6, 9-25.
49. Santos-Sacchi, J. 1992. On the frequency limit and phase of outer hair cell motility: Effects of the membrane filter. J Neurosci, 12, 1906-1916.
50. Schmiedt, R.A., Lang, H., Okamura, H.O. & Schulte, B.A. 2002. Effects of furosemide applied chronically to the round window: A model of metabolic presbyacusis. J Neurosci, 22, 9643-9650.
51. Schuknecht, H.F. & Gace, M.R. 1993. Cochlear pathology in presbycusis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 102, 1-16.
52. Scollie, S., Seewald, R., Cornelisse, L., Moodie, S., Bagatto, M., et al. 2005. The desired sensation level multistage input/output algorithm. Trends Amplif, 9, 159-197.
53. Sewell, W.F. 1984. Furosemide selectively reduces one component in rate-level functions from auditory-nerve fibers. Hear Res, 15, 69-72.
54. Shaw, E.A.G. 1974. Transformation of sound pressure level from the free field to the eardrum in the horizontal plane. J Acoust Soc Am, 56, 1848-1861.
55. Stenfelt, S. & Goode, R.L. 2005. Bone conducted sound: Physiological and clinical aspects. Otol Neurotol, 26, 1245-1261.
56. Stenfelt, S., Hato, N. & Goode, R.L. 2004. Fluid volume displacement at the oval and round windows with air and bone conduction stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am, 115, 797-812.
57. Stenfelt, S., Puria, S., Hato, N. & Goode, R.L. 2003. Basilar membrane and osseous spiral lamina motion in human cadavers with air and bone conduction stimuli. Hear Res, 181, 131-143.
58. Summer, C.J., O'Mard, L.P., Lopez-Poveda, E.A. & Meddis, R. 2003. A nonlinear filterbank model of the guinea-pig cochlear nerve: Rate responses. J Acoust Soc Am, 113, 3264-3274.
59. Trautwein, P., Hofstetter, P., Wang, J., Salvi, R. & Nostrant, A. 1996. Selective inner hair cell loss does not alter distortion product emissions. Hear Res, 96, 71-82.
60. Van Eyken, E., van Camp, G. & Van Laer, L. 2007. The complexity of age-related hearing impairment: Contributing environmental and genetic factors. Audiol Neurotol, 12, 345-358.
61. Van Tasell, D. 1993. Hearing loss, speech, and hearing aids. J Speech Hear Res, 36, 228-244.
62. Zilany, M.A.S. & Bruce, I.C. 2006. Modeling auditory-nerve responses for high sound pressure levels in the normal and impaired auditory periphery. J Acoust Soc Am, 120, 1446-1466.