Elective single embryo transfer: A 6-year progressive implementation of 784 single blastocyst transfers and the influence of payment method on patient choice

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 92, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1895-1906

  Stillman, Robert J ^a   Richter, Kevin S ^a   Banks, Nicole K ^b   Graham, James R ^a  

^a Shady Grove Fertility Reproductive Science Center   (United States)

^b GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

blastocyst transfer; elective single embryo transfer; embryo transfer; In vitro fertilization; insurance; multiple pregnancy; pregnancy; Shared Risk

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLASTOCYST; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTIVE SINGLE EMBRYO TRANSFER; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; INSURANCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIPLE PREGNANCY; NIDATION; OOCYTE RETRIEVAL; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TWIN PREGNANCY;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; INFERTILITY, FEMALE; INSURANCE, HEALTH; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; PREGNANCY, HIGH-RISK; PREGNANCY, MULTIPLE; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SINGLE EMBRYO TRANSFER;

EID: 70349284297     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.023     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Cramer D.W., Liberman R.F., Powers D., Hornstein M.D., McShane P., and Barbieri R.L. Recent trends in assisted reproductive techniques and associated outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 95 (2000) 61-66
2. Jain T., Missmer S.A., and Hornstein M.D. Trends in embryo-transfer practice and in outcomes of the use of assisted reproductive technology in the United States. N Engl J Med 350 (2004) 1639-1645
3. Arslan M., Bocca S., Mirkin S., Barroso G., Stadtmauer L., and Oehninger S. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols for in vitro fertilization: two decades of experience after the birth of Elizabeth Carr. Fertil Steril 84 (2005) 555-569
4. Fauser B.C., and Edwards R.G. The early days of IVF. Hum Reprod Update 11 (2005) 437-438
5. Hunault C.C., Eijkemans M.J., Pieters M.H., te Velde E.R., Habbema J.D., Fauser B.C., et al. A prediction model for selecting patients undergoing in vitro fertilization for elective single embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 77 (2002) 725-732
6. Ng E.H., Chan C.C., Tang O.S., and Ho P.C. Antral follicle count and FSH concentration after clomiphene citrate challenge test in the prediction of ovarian response during IVF treatment. Hum Reprod 20 (2005) 1647-1654
7. Gardner D.K., and Sakkas D. Assessment of embryo viability: the ability to select a single embryo for transfer-a review. Placenta 24 Suppl B (2003) S5-12
8. Baczkowski T., Kurzawa R., and Glabowski W. Methods of embryo scoring in in vitro fertilization. Reprod Biol 4 (2004) 5-22
9. The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Multiple gestation pregnancy. Hum Reprod 15 (2000) 1856-1864
10. Adashi E.Y., Barri P.N., Berkowitz R., Braude P., Bryan E., Carr J., et al. Infertility therapy-associated multiple pregnancies (births): an ongoing epidemic. Reprod Biomed Online 7 (2003) 515-542
11. Gibbons W., Grainger D., Cedars M., Jain T., Klein N., and Stern J. Continuous quality improvement and assisted reproductive technology multiple gestations: some progress, some answers, more questions. Fertil Steril 88 (2007) 301-304
12. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Practice Committee Opinion. Guidelines on number of embryos transferred (January 1998), ASRM, Birmingham, AL
13. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Practice Committee Opinion. Guidelines on number of embryos transferred (November 1999), ASRM, Birmingham, AL
14. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guidelines on the number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril 82 (2004) 773-774
15. The Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guidelines on the number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril 86 (2006) S51-S52
16. Reynolds M.A., and Schieve L.A. Trends in embryo transfer practices and multiple gestation for IVF procedures in the USA, 1996-2002. Hum Reprod 21 (2006) 694-700
17. Stern J.E., Cedars M.I., Jain T., Klein N.A., Beaird C.M., Grainger D.A., et al. Assisted reproductive technology practice patterns and the impact of embryo transfer guidelines in the United States. Fertil Steril 88 (2007) 275-282
18. Dickey R.P. The relative contribution of assisted reproductive technologies and ovulation induction to multiple births in the United States 5 years after the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommendation to limit the number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril 88 (2007) 1554-1561
19. Stillman R.J. A 47-year-old woman with fertility problems who desires a multiple pregnancy. Jama 297 (2007) 858-867
20. Coetsier T., and Dhont M. Avoiding multiple pregnancies in in-vitro fertilization: who's afraid of single embryo transfer?. Hum Reprod 13 (1998) 2663-2664
21. ESHRE Campus Course Report. Prevention of twin pregnancies after IVF/ICSI by single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 16 (2001) 790-800
22. Land J.A., and Evers J.L. Risks and complications in assisted reproduction techniques: Report of an ESHRE consensus meeting. Hum Reprod 18 (2003) 455-457
23. Martikainen H., Tiitinen A., Tomas C., Tapanainen J., Orava M., Tuomivaara L., et al. One versus two embryo transfer after IVF and ICSI: a randomized study. Hum Reprod 16 (2001) 1900-1903
24. Gerris J., De Neubourg D., Mangelschots K., Van Royen E., Vercruyssen M., Barudy-Vasquez J., et al. Elective single day 3 embryo transfer halves the twinning rate without decrease in the ongoing pregnancy rate of an IVF/ICSI programme. Hum Reprod 17 (2002) 2626-2631
25. De Sutter P., Van der Elst J., Coetsier T., and Dhont M. Single embryo transfer and multiple pregnancy rate reduction in IVF/ICSI: a 5-year appraisal. Reprod Biomed Online 6 (2003) 464-469
26. Soderstrom-Anttila V., Vilska S., Makinen S., Foudila T., and Suikkari A.M. Elective single embryo transfer yields good delivery rates in oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 18 (2003) 1858-1863
27. Tiitinen A., Unkila-Kallio L., Halttunen M., and Hyden-Granskog C. Impact of elective single embryo transfer on the twin pregnancy rate. Hum Reprod 18 (2003) 1449-1453
28. Gardner D.K., Surrey E., Minjarez D., Leitz A., Stevens J., and Schoolcraft W.B. Single blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril 81 (2004) 551-555
29. Thurin A., Hausken J., Hillensjo T., Jablonowska B., Pinborg A., Strandell A., et al. Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 351 (2004) 2392-2402
30. Criniti A., Thyer A., Chow G., Lin P., Klein N., and Soules M. Elective single blastocyst transfer reduces twin rates without compromising pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril 84 (2005) 1613-1619
31. Gordts S., Campo R., Puttemans P., Brosens I., Valkenburg M., Norre J., et al. Belgian legislation and the effect of elective single embryo transfer on IVF outcome. Reprod Biomed Online 10 (2005) 436-441
32. Henman M., Catt J.W., Wood T., Bowman M.C., de Boer K.A., and Jansen R.P. Elective transfer of single fresh blastocysts and later transfer of cryostored blastocysts reduces the twin pregnancy rate and can improve the in vitro fertilization live birth rate in younger women. Fertil Steril 84 (2005) 1620-1627
33. Lukassen H.G., Braat D.D., Wetzels A.M., Zielhuis G.A., Adang E.M., Scheenjes E., et al. Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 20 (2005) 702-708
34. Saldeen P., and Sundstrom P. Would legislation imposing single embryo transfer be a feasible way to reduce the rate of multiple pregnancies after IVF treatment?. Hum Reprod 20 (2005) 4-8
35. Svobodova M., Brezinova J., Oborna I., Dostal J., and Lubusky M. [Prevention of multiple pregnancy after IVF/ICSI by elective single embryo transfer-pilot study]. Ceska Gynekol 70 (2005) 343-347
36. van Montfoort A.P., Dumoulin J.C., Land J.A., Coonen E., Derhaag J.G., and Evers J.L. Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) policy in the first three IVF/ICSI treatment cycles. Hum Reprod 20 (2005) 433-436
37. Ertzeid G., Fedorcsak P., Abyholm T., and Tanbo T. [Elective single embryo transfer in assisted reproduction]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 126 (2006) 3101-3102
38. Giorgetti C., Chabert-Orsini V., Barry B., Chinchole J.M., Franquebalme J.P., Hans E., et al. [Elective single embryo transfer: a justified policy for selected patients]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 34 (2006) 317-322
39. Le Lannou D., Griveau J.F., Laurent M.C., Gueho A., Veron E., and Morcel K. Contribution of embryo cryopreservation to elective single embryo transfer in IVF-ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online 13 (2006) 368-375
40. Romundstad L.B., Sunde A., Kjotrod S., Stoum H., Kierulf K.H., Lippe B., et al. [Elective single embryo transfer in assisted reproduction]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 126 (2006) 3098-3100
41. van Montfoort A.P., Fiddelers A.A., Janssen J.M., Derhaag J.G., Dirksen C.D., Dunselman G.A., et al. In unselected patients, elective single embryo transfer prevents all multiples, but results in significantly lower pregnancy rates compared with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 21 (2006) 338-343
42. Veleva Z., Vilska S., Hyden-Granskog C., Tiitinen A., Tapanainen J.S., and Martikainen H. Elective single embryo transfer in women aged 36-39 years. Hum Reprod 21 (2006) 2098-2102
43. Leniaud L., Poncelet C., Porcher R., Martin-Pont B., Cedrin-Durnerin I., Hugues J.N., et al. [Prospective evaluation of elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization: a two-year French hospital experience]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 36 (2008) 159-165
44. IFFS surveillance 04. Fertil Steril 81 (2004) S1-55
45. IFFS surveillance 07. Fertil Steril 87 (2007) S1-67
46. De Neubourg D., Gerris J., Van Royen E., Mangelschots K., and Vercruyssen M. Impact of a restriction in the number of embryos transferred on the multiple pregnancy rate. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 124 (2006) 212-215
47. Gleicher N., Weghofer A., and Barad D. A formal comparison of the practice of assisted reproductive technologies between Europe and the USA. Hum Reprod 21 (2006) 1945-1950
48. Van Landuyt L., Verheyen G., Tournaye H., Camus M., Devroey P., and Van Steirteghem A. New Belgian embryo transfer policy leads to sharp decrease in multiple pregnancy rate. Reprod Biomed Online 13 (2006) 765-771
49. Faber K. IVF in the US: multiple gestation, economic competition, and the necessity of excess. Hum Reprod 12 (1997) 1614-1616
50. Jain T., Harlow B.L., and Hornstein M.D. Insurance coverage and outcomes of in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 347 (2002) 661-666
51. Reynolds M.A., Schieve L.A., Jeng G., and Peterson H.B. Does insurance coverage decrease the risk for multiple births associated with assisted reproductive technology?. Fertil Steril 80 (2003) 16-23
52. Henne M.B., and Bundorf M.K. Insurance mandates and trends in infertility treatments. Fertil Steril 89 (2008) 66-73
53. The Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Shared-risk or refund programs in assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril 82 Suppl 1 (2004) S249-S250
54. Eichenlaub-Ritter U. Parental age-related aneuploidy in human germ cells and offspring: a story of past and present. Environ Mol Mutagen 28 (1996) 211-236
55. Ola B., and Li T.C. Implantation failure following in-vitro fertilization. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 18 (2006) 440-445
56. Dennis S.J., Thomas M.A., Williams D.B., and Robins J.C. Embryo morphology score on day 3 is predictive of implantation and live birth rates. J Assist Reprod Genet 23 (2006) 171-175
57. Balaban B., Yakin K., and Urman B. Randomized comparison of two different blastocyst grading systems. Fertil Steril 85 (2006) 559-563
58. Sauer M.V., Paulson R.J., and Lobo R.A. Oocyte donation to women of advanced reproductive age: pregnancy results and obstetrical outcomes in patients 45 years and older. Hum Reprod 11 (1996) 2540-2543
59. Licciardi F., Berkeley A.S., Krey L., Grifo J., and Noyes N. A two- versus three-embryo transfer: the oocyte donation model. Fertil Steril 75 (2001) 510-513
60. Reynolds M.A., Schieve L.A., Jeng G., Peterson H.B., and Wilcox L.S. Risk of multiple birth associated with in vitro fertilization using donor eggs. Am J Epidemiol 154 (2001) 1043-1050
61. Budak E., Garrido N., Soares S.R., Melo M.A., Meseguer M., Pellicer A., et al. Improvements achieved in an oocyte donation program over a 10-year period: sequential increase in implantation and pregnancy rates and decrease in high-order multiple pregnancies. Fertil Steril 88 (2007) 342-349
62. The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Multiple pregnancy associated with infertility therapy. Fertil Steril 86 (2006) S106-S110
63. Callahan T.L., Hall J.E., Ettner S.L., Christiansen C.L., Greene M.F., and Crowley Jr. W.F. The economic impact of multiple-gestation pregnancies and the contribution of assisted-reproduction techniques to their incidence. N Engl J Med 331 (1994) 244-249
64. Pinborg A., Loft A., and Nyboe Andersen A. Neonatal outcome in a Danish national cohort of 8602 children born after in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection: the role of twin pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83 (2004) 1071-1078
65. Pandian Z., Templeton A., Serour G., and Bhattacharya S. Number of embryos for transfer after IVF and ICSI: a Cochrane review. Hum Reprod 20 (2005) 2681-2687
66. Styer A.K., Wright D.L., Wolkovich A.M., Veiga C., and Toth T.L. Single-blastocyst transfer decreases twin gestation without affecting pregnancy outcome. Fertil Steril (2007)
67. Vilska S., Tiitinen A., Hyden-Granskog C., and Hovatta O. Elective transfer of one embryo results in an acceptable pregnancy rate and eliminates the risk of multiple birth. Hum Reprod 14 (1999) 2392-2395
68. Kovacs G., MacLachlan V., Rombauts L., Healy D., and Howlett D. Replacement of one selected embryo is just as successful as two embryo transfer, without the risk of twin pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 43 (2003) 369-371
69. Gerris J., De Sutter P., De Neubourg D., Van Royen E., Vander Elst J., Mangelschots K., et al. A real-life prospective health economic study of elective single embryo transfer versus two-embryo transfer in first IVF/ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod 19 (2004) 917-923
70. Koryntova D., Moosova M., Rezabek K., Pavelkova I., and Mara M. [Single embryo transfer does not compromise the pregnancy rate in patients with good IVF/ICSI prognosis]. Ceska Gynekol 70 (2005) 435-439
71. Soderstrom-Anttila V., and Vilska S. Five years of single embryo transfer with anonymous and non-anonymous oocyte donation. Reprod Biomed Online 15 (2007) 428-433
72. Kjellberg A.T., Carlsson P., and Bergh C. Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis. Hum Reprod 21 (2006) 210-216
73. De Sutter P., Gerris J., and Dhont M. A health-economic decision-analytic model comparing double with single embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI. Hum Reprod 17 (2002) 2891-2896
74. Wolner-Hanssen P., and Rydhstroem H. Cost-effectiveness analysis of in-vitro fertilization: estimated costs per successful pregnancy after transfer of one or two embryos. Hum Reprod 13 (1998) 88-94
75. Strandell A., Bergh C., and Lundin K. Selection of patients suitable for one-embryo transfer may reduce the rate of multiple births by half without impairment of overall birth rates. Hum Reprod 15 (2000) 2520-2525
76. Thurin A., Hardarson T., Hausken J., Jablonowska B., Lundin K., Pinborg A., et al. Predictors of ongoing implantation in IVF in a good prognosis group of patients. Hum Reprod 20 (2005) 1876-1880
77. Broekmans F.J., Kwee J., Hendriks D.J., Mol B.W., and Lambalk C.B. A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum Reprod Update 12 (2006) 685-718
78. Hellberg D., Blennborn M., and Nilsson S. Defining women who are prone to have twins in in vitro fertilization-a necessary step towards single embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet 22 (2005) 199-206
79. Schwarzler P., Zech H., Auer M., Pfau K., Gobel G., Vanderzwalmen P., et al. Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst transfer as compared to early cleavage stage embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 19 (2004) 2097-2102
80. Papanikolaou E.G., D'Haeseleer E., Verheyen G., Van de Velde H., Camus M., Van Steirteghem A., et al. Live birth rate is significantly higher after blastocyst transfer than after cleavage-stage embryo transfer when at least four embryos are available on day 3 of embryo culture. A randomized prospective study. Hum Reprod 20 (2005) 3198-3203
81. Papanikolaou E.G., Camus M., Kolibianakis E.M., Van Landuyt L., Van Steirteghem A., and Devroey P. In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos. N Engl J Med 354 (2006) 1139-1146
82. Blake D.A., Farquhar C.M., Johnson N., and Proctor M. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2007) CD002118
83. Rehman K.S., Bukulmez O., Langley M., Carr B.R., Nackley A.C., Doody K.M., et al. Late stages of embryo progression are a much better predictor of clinical pregnancy than early cleavage in intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization cycles with blastocyst-stage transfer. Fertil Steril 87 (2007) 1041-1052
84. Singh R., and Sinclair K.D. Metabolomics: approaches to assessing oocyte and embryo quality. Theriogenology 68 Suppl 1 (2007) S56-S62
85. Bromer J.G., and Seli E. Assessment of embryo viability in assisted reproductive technology: shortcomings of current approaches and the emerging role of metabolomics. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 20 (2008) 234-241
86. Dickey R.P., and Pyrzak R. Preimplantation genetic screening will play a dominant role in selecting embryos for single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 20 (2005) 2978
87. El-Sayed A., Hoelker M., Rings F., Salilew D., Jennen D., Tholen E., et al. Large-scale transcriptional analysis of bovine embryo biopsies in relation to pregnancy success after transfer to recipients. Physiol Genomics 28 (2006) 84-96
88. Gasca S., Pellestor F., Assou S., Loup V., Anahory T., Dechaud H., et al. Identifying new human oocyte marker genes: a microarray approach. Reprod Biomed Online 14 (2007) 175-183
89. Davis L.B., Lathi R.B., Westphal L.M., and Milki A.A. Elective single blastocyst transfer in women older than 35. Fertil Steril 89 (2008) 230-231
90. Gleicher N., Campbell D.P., Chan C.L., Karande V., Rao R., Balin M., et al. The desire for multiple births in couples with infertility problems contradicts present practice patterns. Hum Reprod 10 (1995) 1079-1084
91. Goldfarb J., Kinzer D.J., Boyle M., and Kurit D. Attitudes of in vitro fertilization and intrauterine insemination couples toward multiple gestation pregnancy and multifetal pregnancy reduction. Fertil Steril 65 (1996) 815-820
92. Grobman W.A., Milad M.P., Stout J., and Klock S.C. Patient perceptions of multiple gestations: an assessment of knowledge and risk aversion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185 (2001) 920-924
93. Pinborg A., Loft A., Schmidt L., and Andersen A.N. Attitudes of IVF/ICSI-twin mothers towards twins and single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 18 (2003) 621-627
94. Hojgaard A., Ottosen L.D., Kesmodel U., and Ingerslev H.J. Patient attitudes towards twin pregnancies and single embryo transfer-a questionnaire study. Hum Reprod 22 (2007) 2673-2678
95. Ryan G.L., Zhang S.H., Dokras A., Syrop C.H., and Van Voorhis B.J. The desire of infertile patients for multiple births. Fertil Steril 81 (2004) 500-504
96. Scotland G.S., McNamee P., Peddie V.L., and Bhattacharya S. Safety versus success in elective single embryo transfer: women's preferences for outcomes of in vitro fertilisation. Br J Obstet Gynecol 114 (2007) 977-983