Single embryo transfer does not compromise the pregnancy rate in patients with good IVF/ICSI prognosis;Transfer jednoho embrya u pacientek s dobrou prognózou léčby pomocí IVF/ICSI nesnižuje pravdě podobnost otěhotnění

Ceska Gynekologie

Volumn 70, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 435-439

  Koryntová, Dana ^a,b   Moosova M ^a   Rezabek K ^a   Pavelkova I ^a   Mara M ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

IVF ICSI; Pregnancy; Single embryo transfer; Twins

Indexed keywords

GOSERELIN; UROFOLLITROPIN;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL OBSERVATION; DOUBLE EMBRYO TRANSFER; ELECTIVE SINGLE EMBRYO TRANSFER; EMBRYO; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; PREGNANCY RATE; PREGNANCY TEST; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STUDENT T TEST; TWIN PREGNANCY;

EID: 33144467449     PISSN: 12107832     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bergh, Ch. Single embryo transfer: a mini-review. Hum. Reprod., 2005, 20, p. 323-327.
2. Březinová, J., Oborná, I., Svobodová, M., et al. Embrya s časným dělením (early cleavage) a jejich vliv na vysledky klasického IVF. Čes. Gynek., 2003, 68, s. 449-453.
3. Coetsier, T., Devroey, P., Dhont, M., et al. Prevention of twin pregnancies after IVF/ICSI by single embryo transfer. Hum. Reprod., 2001. 16, p. 790-800.
4. Crosignani, P.G., Rubin, B. L. Multiple gestation pregnancy. Hum. Reprod., 2000, 15, p. 1856-1864.
5. De Neubourg, D., Mangelschots, K., Van Royen, E., et al. Impact of patient's choise for single embryo transfer of a top quality embryo versus double embryo transfer in the first IVF/ICSI cycle. Hum. Reprod., 2002, 17, p. 2621-2625.
6. De Sutter, P., Gerris, J., Dhont, M. A health-economic decision-analytic model comparing double with single embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI. Hum. Reprod., 2002, 17, p. 2891-2896.
7. Dittrichová, J., Mrázek, M., Pilařová, M., et al. Psychický stav dětí L těhotenství po asistované reprodukci ve třetím roce života. Čes. Gynek., 69, 2004, s. 172-177.
8. European IVF-monitoring programme (EIM).: Assisted reproctive technology in Europe, 2000. Results generated from european registers by ESHRE. Hum.Reprod. 2004, r. 19, p. 490-503.
9. Gardner, D. K., Surrey, E., Minjarez, D., et al. Single blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial. Fertil. Steril., 2004. 81, p. 551-555.
10. Garello, C., Baker, H., Rai, J., et al. Pronuclear orientation, polar body placement and embryo quality after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in-vitro fertilization: further evidence for polarity in human oocytes? Hum. Reprod., 1999, 14, p. 2588-2595.
11. Gerris, J. M. Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal. Hum. Reprod. Update, 2005, 11, p. 105-121.
12. Gerris, J., De Neubourg, D., Mangelschots, K., et al. Prevention of twin pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection based on strict embryo criteria: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Hum. Reprod., 1999, 14, p. 2581-2587.
13. Gerris, J., De Sutter, P., De Neubourg, D., et al. A real-life prospective health economic study of elective single embryo transfer versus two-embryo transfer in first IVF/ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod., 2004, 19, p. 917-923.
14. Lukassen, H.G., Braat, D. D., Wetzels, A. M., et al. Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Hum. Reprod., 2005, 20, p. 702-708.
15. Luke, B., Keith, L. G. The contribution of singletons, twins and triplets to low-birth-weight, infant-mortality and handicap in the United States. J. Reprod. Med., 1992, 37, p. 661-666.
16. Martikainen, H., Tiitinen, A., Tomas, C., et al. Finnish ET Study Group. One versus two embryo transfer after IVF and ICSI: a randomized study. Hum. Reprod., 2001, 16, p. 1900-1903.
17. Palmstierna, M., Murkes, D., Csemiczky, G., et al. Zona pellucida thickness variation and occurrence of visible mononucleated blastomeres in preembryos are associated with a high pregnancy rate in IVF treatment. J.Assist.Reprod.Genet., 1998, 15, p. 75-70.
18. Sebire, N. J., Jolly, M., Harris, J., et al. Risks of obstetric complications in multiple pregnancies: an analysis of more than 400 000 pregnancies in the UK. Prenat. Neonatal. Med., 2001, 6, p. 89-94.
19. Strömberg, B., Dahlquist, G., Ericson, A., et al. Neurological sequelae in children born after in-vitro fertilization: a population-based study. Lancet, 2002, 359, p. 461-465.
20. Tiitinen, A., Halttunen, M., Harkki, P., et al. Elective single embryo transfer: the value of cryopreservation. Hum Reprod.. 2001, 6, p. 1140-1144.
21. Van Montfoort, A. P. A., Dumoulin, J. C. M., Land, J. A., et al. Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) policy in the first three IVF/ICSI treatment cycles. Hum. Reprod.. 2005, 20, p. 433-436.
22. Van Royen, E., Mangelschots, K., De Neubourg, D. Characterization of a top quality embryo, a step towards single-embryo transfer. Hum. Reprod. 1999, 9, p. 2345-2349.
23. Vilska, S., Tiitinen, A., Hyden-Granskog, C., et al. Elective transfer of one embryo results in an acceptable pregnancy rate and eliminates the risk of multiple birth. Hum Reprod.. 1999, 14, p. 2392-2395.
24. Wang, J. X., Norman, R. J., Kristiansson, P. The effect of various infertility treatments on the risk of preterm birth. Hum. Reprod., 2002, 17, p. 945-949.