Neonatal outcome in a Danish national cohort of 8602 children born after in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection: The role of twin pregnancy

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 83, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 1071-1078

  Pinborg, Anja ^a   Loft, Anne ^a   Andersen, Anders Nyboe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Congenital malformations; FVF ICSI; Neonatal outcome; Singletons; Twins

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER INCIDENCE; CESAREAN SECTION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; DENMARK; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; HYPOSPADIAS; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; NEWBORN; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK; STILLBIRTH; TWIN PREGNANCY;

ADULT; COHORT STUDIES; DENMARK; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT MORTALITY; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, NEWBORN, DISEASES; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS, NEONATAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ADMISSION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; REGISTRIES; SPERM INJECTIONS, INTRACYTOPLASMIC; TWINS;

EID: 4043184342     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00476.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Nygren KG, Nyboe Andersen A. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 1999. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 3260-74.
2. Imaizumi Y. A comparative study of twinning and triplet rates in 17 countries, 1972-1996. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 1998; 47: 101-14.
3. Sperling L, Tabor A. Twin pregnancy: the role of ultrasound in management. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001; 80: 287-99.
4. Schachter M, Raziel A, Shevach F, Strassburger D, Bern O, Ron-El R. Monozygotic twinning after assisted reproductive techniques: a phenomenon independent of micromanipulation. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 1264-9.
5. Bryan E, Little J, Burn J. Congenital anomalies in twins. Bailliere's Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 1: 697-721.
6. Loos R, Derom C, Vlietinck R, Derom R. The East Flanders Prospective Twin Survey: a population-based register. Twin Res 1998; 1: 167-75.
7. Bergh T, Ericson A, Hillensjö T, Nygren KG, Wennerholm UB. Deliveries and children born after in-vitro fertilisation in Sweden 1982-95: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 1999; 354: 1579-85.
8. Dhont M, Sutler PD, Ruyssinck G, Martens G, Bekaert A. Perinatal outcome of pregnancies after assisted reproduction: a case-control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 688-95.
9. Koivurova S, Hartikainen AL, Gissler M, Hemminki E, Sovio U, Jarvelin MR. Neonatal outcome and congenital malformations in children born after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 1391-8.
10. Schieve LA, Meikle SF, Ferre C, Peterson HB, Jeng G, Wilcox LS. Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 731-7.
11. Westergaard HB, Johansen AMT, Erb K, Nyboe Andersen A. Danish National In-vitro Fertilization Registry 1994 and 1995: a controlled study of birth, malformations and cytogenetic findings. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 1896-902.
12. Nyboe Andersen A, Westergaard HB, Olsen J. The Danish in vitro fertilisation (IVF) Registry. Dan Med Bull 1999; 46: 357-60.
13. Knudsen L, Olsen J. The Danish Medical Birth Registry. Dan Med Bull 1998; 45: 320-3.
14. Andersen TF, Madsen M, Jorgensen J, Mellemkjaer L, Olsen J. The Danish Hospital Register. A valuable source of data for modern health sciences. Dan Med Bull 1999; 46: 263-8.
15. Larsen H, Nielsen GL, Bendsen J, Flint C, Olsen J, Sørensen HT. Predictive value and completeness of the registration of congenital abnormalities in three Danish population-based registries. Scand J Public Health 2003; 31: 12-16.
16. Weinberg W. Beiträge zur Physiologie und Pathologie der Mehrlingsgebuhrten beim Menschen. Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere 1902; 88: 346-430.
17. Källen B. Congenital malformations in twins: a population study. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 1986; 35: 167-78.
18. Doyle P, Beral V, Botting B, Wale C. Congenital malformations in twins in England and Wales. J Epidemiol Community Health 1991; 45: 43-8.
19. Bonduelle M, Liebaers I, Dekelelaere V, Derde MP, Camus M, Devroey P et al. Neonatal data on a cohort of 2889 infants born after ICSI (1991-1999) and of 2995 infants born after IVF (1983-1999). Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 671-94.
20. Ericson, A, Källen B. Congenital malformations in infants born after IVF: a population-based study. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 504-9.
21. Moll AC, Imhof SM, Cruysberg JRM, Meeteren AYNS-V, Boers M, Leeuwen FEV. Incidence of retinoblastoma in children born after in-vitro fertilisation. Lancet 2003; 361: 309-10.
22. Pinborg A, Loft A, Rasmussen S, Schmidt L, Langhoff-Roos J, Greisen G et al. Neonatal outcome in a Danish national cohort of 3438 IVF/ICSI and 10362 non-IVF/ICSI twins born between 1995 and 2000. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 435-41.
23. Ericson A, Nygren KG, Otterblad Olauson P, Källen B. Hospital care utilization of infants born after IVF. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 929-32.
24. Strömberg B, Dahlquist G, Ericson A, Finnström O, Köster M, Stjernquist K. Neurological sequelae in children born after in-vitro fertilisation: a population based study. Lancet 2002; 359: 461-5.
25. Pinborg A, Loft A, Schmidt L, Nyboe Andersen A. Morbidity in a Danish National Cohort of 472 IVF/ICSI twins, 1132 non-IVF/ICSI twins and 634 IVF/ICSI singletons: health-related and social implications for the children and their families. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 1234-43.
26. Pinborg A, Loft A, Schmidt L, Langhoff-Roos J, Nyboe Andersen A. Maternal risks and perinatal outcome in a Danish National cohort of 1005 twin pregnancies: the role of in vitro fertilization (IVF). Acta Gynecol Obstet Scand 2004; 83: 75-84.
27. De Sutter P, Gerris J, Dhont M. A health-economic decision-analytic model comparing double with single embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 2891-6.
28. Gerris J, De Neubourg D, Mangelschots K, Van Royen E, Van de Meerssche M, Valkenburg M. Prevention of twin pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection based on strict embryo criteria: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 2581-7.
29. Martikainen H, Tiitinen A, Tomás C, Tapainen J, Orava M, Tuomivaara L et al. One versus two embryo transfer after IVF and ICSI: a randomized study. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 1900-3.
30. De Neubourg D, Mangelschots K, Van Royen E, Vercruyssen M, Ryckaert G, Valkenburg M et al. Impact of patients' choice for single embryo transfer of a top quality embryo versus double embryo transfer in the first IVF/ICSI cycle. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 2621-5.
31. Tiitinen A, Unkila-Kallio L, Halttunen M, Hyden-Granskog C. Impact of elective single embryo transfer on the twin pregnancy rate. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 1449-53.