Endodontic working length assessment: Comparison of storage phosphor digital imaging and radiographic film

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics

Volumn 85, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 325-328

  Cederberg, Robert A ^a   Tidwell, Eddy ^a   Frederiksen, Neil L ^a   Benson, Byron W ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MOLAR TOOTH; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OBSERVER VARIATION; ODONTOMETRY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH PULP; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH ROOT; X RAY FILM;

BICUSPID; CUSPID; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; HUMANS; MOLAR; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OBSERVER VARIATION; ODONTOMETRY; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; ROOT CANAL THERAPY; TOOTH APEX; TOOTH ROOT; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 0032014790     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90017-8     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Dummer PMH. McGinn JH, Rees DG. The position and topography of the apical constriction and apical foramen. Int Endod J 1984;17:192-8.
2. Weine FS. Endodontic therapy, 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Co.; 1989. p. 295.
3. Huda W, Rill LN, Benn DK, Pettigrew JC. Comparison of a photostimulable phosphor system with film for dental radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;83: 725-31.
4. Shearer AC, Horner K, Wilson NHF. Radiovisiography for imaging root canals: an in vitro comparison with conventional radiography. Quint Int 1990;21:789-94.
5. Shearer AC, Horner K, Wilson NHF. Radiovisiography for length estimation in root canal treatment: an in vitro comparison with conventional radiography. Int Endod J 1991;24:233-9.
6. Griffiths BM, Brown JE, Hyatt AT, Linney AD. Comparison of three imaging techniques for assessing endodontic working length. Int Endod J 1992;25:279-87.
7. Hedrick RT, Dove SB, Peters DD, McDavid WD. Radiographic determination of canal length: direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography. J Endod 1994;20:320-6.
8. Leddy BJ, Miles DA, Newton CW, Brown CE. Interpretation of endodontic file lengths using radiovisiography. J Endod 1994;20:542-5.
9. Sanderink GCH, Huiskens R, van der Stelt PF, Welander US, Stheeman SE. Image quality of direct digital intraoral x-ray sensors in assessing root canal length. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994;78:125-32.
10. Ong EY, Pitt Ford TR. Comparison of radiovisiography with radiographic film in root length determination. Int Endod J 1995;28:25-9.
11. Conover GL, Hildebolt CF, Yokoyama-Crothers N. Comparison of linear measurements made from storage phosphor and dental radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996;25:268-73.
12. Gratt BM, Sickles EA, Gould RC. Dental xeroradiography for endodontics: a rapid x-ray system that produces high-quality images. J Endod 1979;5:266-70.
13. Barkhordar RA, Nicholson RJ, Nguyen NT, Abbas J. An evaluation of xeroradiographs and radiographs in length determination in endodontics. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987;64: 747-50.
14. Velders XL, Sanderink GCH, van der Stelt PF. Dose reduction of two digital sensor systems measuring file lengths. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;81:607-12.
15. Brettle DS, Workman A, Ellwood RP, Launders JH, Horner K, Davies RM. The imaging performance of a storage phosphor system for dental radiography. Br J Radiol 1996;69:256-61.