Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital imaging by using CCD and CMOS-APS sensors with E-speed film in the detection of periapical bony lesions

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics

Volumn 89, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 356-362

  Paurazas, Susan B ^a,c   Geist, James R ^b   Pink, Frank E ^b   Hoen, Michael M ^b   Steiman, H Robert ^b  

^a School of Dentistry ^*

^b School of Dentistry

^c UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENDODONTICS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; JAW; JAW DISEASE; METHODOLOGY; OSTEOLYSIS; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGY; ROC CURVE; TOOTH PERIAPICAL DISEASE; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH ROOT; X RAY FILM;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ENDODONTICS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MANDIBULAR DISEASES; PERIAPICAL DISEASES; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; RADIOLOGY; ROC CURVE; TOOTH ROOT; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 0034146665     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/moe.2000.103525     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Lim KF, Loh E-M, Hong YH. Intra-oral computed radiography: an in vitro evaluation. J Dent 1996;24:359-64.
2. Farman AG, Scarfe WC, Schick DB, Rumack PM. Computed dental radiography: evaluation of a new charge-coupled-device-based intraoral radiographic system. Quintessence International 1995;26:399-404.
3. Miles D. Imaging using solid-state detectors. Dent Clin N Am 1993;37:531-40.
4. Fossum ER. CMOS evolution: the digital camera-on-a-chip gets active. Advanced Imaging 1997;13-14,74.
5. Fossum ER. Active pixel sensors: Are CCDs dinosaurs? International Society for Optical Engineering (SPIE) 1993;1900:2-14.
6. Barbat J, Messer HH. Detectahility of artificial periapical lesions using direct digital and conventional radiography. J Endod 1998;24:837-42.
7. Kullendorf B, Nilsson M, Rohlin M. Diagnostic accuracy of direct dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;82:344-50.
8. Holtzmann DJ, Johnson WT, Southard TE, Khademi JA, Chang PJ, Rivera EM. Storage-phosphor computed radiography versus film radiography in the detection of pathologic periradicular hone loss in cadavers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;86:90-7.
9. Tirrell BC, Miles DA, Brown CE, Legan JJ. Interpretation of chemically created lesions using direct digital imaging. J Endod 1996;22:74-8.
10. Yokota ET, Miles DA, Newton CW, Brown CE. Interpretation of periapical lesions using radiovisiography. J Endod 1994;20:490-4.
11. Bender IB, Seltzer S. Roentgenographic and direct observation of experimental lesions in bone, I. J Am Dent Assoc 1961;62:152-60.
12. Bender IB, Seltzer S. Roentgenographic and direct observation of experimental lesions in bone, II. J Am Dent Assoc 1961;62:708-16.
13. Bender IB. Factors influencing the radiographic appearance of bony lesions. J Endod 1982;8:161-70.
14. Schwartz SF, Foster JK. Roentgenographic interpretation of experimentally produced bony lesions, I. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971;32:606-12.
15. Shoha RR, Dowson J, Richards AG. Radiographic interpretation of experimentally produced bony lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1974;38:294-303.
16. Lee SJ, Messer HH. Radiographic appearance of artificially prepared periapical lesions confined to cancellous bone. Int Endod J 1986;19:64-72.
17. Mistak EJ, Loushine RJ, Primack PD, West LA, Runyan DA. Interpretation of periapical lesions comparing conventional, direct digital, and telephonically transmitted radiographic images. J Endod 1998;24:262-6.
18. Versteeg CH, Snaderink CH, van der Stell PF. Efficacy of digital intra-oral radiography in clinical dentistry. J Dent 1997;25:215-24.
19. Goldman M, Pearson AH, Darzenta N. Endodontic success: Who's reading the radiograph? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972;33:432-7.
20. Zakariasen K. Endodontic recall radiographs: How reliable is our interpretation of endodontic success or failure and what factors affect our reliability? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984;57:251-4.
21. van der Stell PF. Computer-assisted interpretation in radiographic diagnosis. Dent Clin N Am 1993;37:683-96.
22. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74.
23. Kerosuo E, Orstavik D. Application of computerised image analysis to monitoring endodontic therapy: reproducibility and comparison with visual assessment. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997;26:79-84.
24. Gelfand M, Sunderman EJ, Goldman M. Reliability of radiographical interpretations. J Endod 1983;9:71-5.
25. Gelfand DW, Ott DJ. Methodologic considerations in comparing imaging methods. Am J Roentgenol 1985;144:1117-21.
26. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143:29-36.