Interpretation of periapical lesions comparing conventional, direct digital, and telephonically transmitted radiographic images

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 262-264

  James Mistak, E ^a   Loushine, Robert J ^a   Primack, Patrice D ^a   West, Lesley A ^a   Runyan, Dennis A ^a  

^a US Army Dental Activity Fort Gordon   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OBSERVER VARIATION; OSTEOLYSIS; RADIOGRAPHY; TELERADIOLOGY; TOOTH PERIAPICAL DISEASE; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERIAPICAL DISEASES; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TELERADIOLOGY;

EID: 0032038164     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0099-2399(98)80110-6     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Vandre RH, Webber RL. Future trends in dental radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1995;80:471-8.
2. Nelvig P, Wing K, Welander U. Sens-A-Ray: a new system for direct digital intraoral radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;74:818-23.
3. Mouyen F, Benz C, Sonnabend E, Lodter JP. Presentation and physical evaluation of Radiovisiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989;68:238-42.
4. Benz C, Mouyen F. Evaluation of the new Radiovisiography system image quality. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991;72:627-31.
5. Dunn SM, Kantor ML. Digital radiology facts and fictions. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:39-47.
6. Yokota ET, Miles DA, Newton CW, Brown CE. Interpretation of periapical lesions using Radiovisiography. J Endodon 1994;20:490-4.
7. Nummikoski PV, Martinez TS, Matteson SR, McDavid WD, Dove SB. Digital subtraction radiography in artificial recurrent caries detection. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1992;21:59-64.
8. Tirrell BC, Miles DA, Brown CE, Legan JJ. Interpretation of chemically created lesions using direct digital imaging. J Endodon 1996;22:74-8.
9. Furkart AJ, Dove SB, McDavid WD, Nummikoski P, Matteson S. Direct digital radiography for the detection of periodontal bone lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;74:652-60.
10. Leddy BJ, Miles DA, Newton CW, Brown CE. Interpretation of endodontic file lengths using Radiovisiography. J Endodon 1994;20:542-5.
11. Ong EY, Pitt Ford TR. Comparison of Radiovisiography with radio-graphic film in root length determination. Int Endod J 1995;28:25-9.
12. Ellingsen MA, Harrington GW, Hollender LG. Radiovisiography versus conventional radiography for detection of small instruments in endodontic length determination. Part 1. In vitro evaluation. J Endodon 1995;21:326-31.
13. Ellingsen MA, Hollender LG, Harrington GW. Radiovisiography versus conventional radiography for detection of small instruments in endodontic length determination. Part 2. In vivo evaluation. J Endodon 1995;21:516-20.