A peer review process for classroom teaching

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Volumn 73, Issue 5, 2009, Pages

  Wellein, Marlea G ^a,c   Ragucci, Kelly R ^a   Lapointe, Marc ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c Trident Health System   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Classroom; Faculty; Peer evaluation; Survey; Teaching

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVALUATION; EXPERIENCE; MEDICAL SCHOOL; ONLINE SYSTEM; PEER REVIEW; PLANNING; TEACHING; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADVISORY COMMITTEE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; PEER GROUP; PERCEPTION; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARD; UNIVERSITY;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, PHARMACY; FACULTY; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; HUMANS; PEER GROUP; PEER REVIEW; PERCEPTION; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; TEACHING;

EID: 70349245067     PISSN: 00029459     EISSN: 15536467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5688/aj730579     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Barnett CW, Matthews HW. Current procedures used to evaluate teaching in schools of pharmacy. Am J Pharm Educ. 1998;62:388-391
2. McKeachie WJ. Student ratings: the validity of use. Am Psych. 1997;52:1218-1225
3. Arreola RA. Developing a Comprehensive Faculty Evaluation System: A Handbook for College Faculty and Administrators on Designing and Operating a Comprehensive Faculty Evaluation System. Boston, Mass: Anker Publishing Co; 1995.
4. Holmes DS. Effects of grades and disconfirmed grade expectancies on students' evaluations of their instructor. J Educ Psychol. 1972;63:130-133
5. Powell RW. Grades, learning and student evaluation of instruction. Res High Educ. 1977;7:193-205.
6. Vasta R, Sarmiento RF. Liberal grading improves evaluations but not performance. J Educ Psychol. 1979;71:207-211
7. Worthington AG, Wong PTP. Effects of earned and assigned grades on student evaluations of an instructor. J Educ Psychol. 1979;71:764-775
8. Kidd RS, Latif DA. Student evaluations: are they valid measure of course effectiveness? Am J Pharm Educ. 2004;68:Article 61.
9. Barnett CW, Matthews HW. Student evaluation of classroom teaching: A study of pharmacy faculty attitudes and effects on instructional practices. Am J Pharm Educ. 1997;61:345-350
10. Wolfgang AP, Gupchup GV, Plake KS. Relative importance of performance criteria in promotion and tenure decisions: Perceptions of pharmacy faculty members. Am J Pharm Educ. 1995;59:342-347
11. Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. Accreditation standards and guidelines for the professional program in pharmacy leading to the doctor of pharmacy degree. http://www.acpe-accredit.org/pdf/ACPE-Revised-PharmD-Standards- Adopted-Jan152006.pdf. Accessed April 17, 2009.
12. Hutchings P. Peer review of teaching. American Association for Health Education bulletin. November 1994: 3-8.
13. Schultz KK, Latif D. The planning and implementation of a faculty peer review teaching project. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70:Article 32.
14. Hansen LB, McCollum M, Paulsen SM, Cyr T, Jarvis CL, Tate G, et al. Evaluation of an evidence-based peer teaching assessment program. Am J Pharm Educ. 2007;71:Article 45. (Pubitemid 46869313)
15. Lubawy WC. Evaluating teaching using the best practices model. Am J Pharm Educ 2003;67:Article 87.
16. Hammer DP, Sauer KA, Fielding DW, Skau KA. White Paper on Best Evidence Pharmacy Education (BEPE). Am J Pharm Educ. 2004;68:Article 24.