The planning and implementation of a faculty peer review teaching project

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2006, Pages

  Schultz, Karen K ^a   Latif, David ^a,b   Dunn, Bernard J ^a  

^a SHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Faculty development; Peer review

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; METHODOLOGY; PEER REVIEW; PHARMACY STUDENT; PILOT STUDY; TEACHING; UNIVERSITY;

FACULTY; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; PEER REVIEW; PILOT PROJECTS; STUDENTS, PHARMACY; TEACHING;

EID: 33646488531     PISSN: 00029459     EISSN: 15536467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5688/aj700232     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Barnett CW, Matthews HW. Current procedures used to evaluate teaching in schools of pharmacy. Am J Pharm Educ. 1998;62:388-91.
2. Chism N. Valuing student differences. In: McKeachie WJ, ed. Teaching Tips 10th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company; 1999.
3. Kidd RS, Latif DA. Student evaluations: Are they valid measures of course effectiveness? Am J Pharm Educ. 2004;68:Article 61.
4. McKeachie WJ. Student ratings: The validity of use. Am Psych. 1997;52:1218-25.
5. Aleamoni LM. Typical faculty concerns about student evaluation of teaching. In: Aleamoni LM, ed. Techniques for evaluations and improving instruction. New directions for teaching and learning, no. 31. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1987.
6. Arreola RA. Developing a Comprehensive Faculty Evaluation System: A handbook for college faculty and administrators on designing and operating a comprehensive faculty evaluation system. Boston, Mass: Anker Publishing Co; 1995.
7. Holmes DS. Effects of grades and disconfirmed grade expectancies on students' evaluations of their instructor. J Educ Psychol. 1972;63:130-3.
8. Powell RW. Grades, learning, and student evaluation of instruction. Res High Educ. 1977;7:193-205.
9. Vasta R, Sarmiento RF. Liberal grading improves evaluations but not performance. J Educ Psychol. 1979;71:207-11.
10. Worthington AG, Wong PTP. Effects of earned and assigned grades on student evaluations of an instructor. J Educ Psychol. 1979;71:764-75.
11. Kerr S. On the folly of rewarding A while hoping for B. Acad Manage J. 1975;18:769-83.
12. Seldin P. How colleges evaluate teaching: 1988 vs. 1998. AAHE Bull. 1998:50(7):3-7.
13. Chism N. Peer Review of Teaching: A Sourcebook. Boston, Mass: Anker Publishing Co; 1999.