The progress of protein quality Control methods in shotgun proteomics

Progress in Biochemistry and Biophysics

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 668-675

  Li, Ning ^a   Wu, Song Feng ^a   Zhu, Yun Ping ^a   Yang, Xiao Ming ^a  

^a BEIJING INSTITUTE OF RADIATION MEDICINE   (China)

Author keywords

MS MS; Protein assembly; Protein identification; Protein probability; Shotgun proteomics

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349194545     PISSN: 10003282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1206.2008.00404     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Aebersold R, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature, 2003, 422 (6928): 198-207
2. He F. Human liver proteome project: plan, progress, and perspectives. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2005, 4 (12): 1841 -1848
3. Steen H, Mann M. The ABC's (and XYZ's) of peptide sequencing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2004, 5 (9): 699-711
4. Yates III J R. Mass spectral analysis in proteomics. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct, 2004, 33: 297-316
5. Nesvizhskii A I, Vitek O, Aebersold R. Analysis and validation of proteomic data generated by tandem mass spectrometry. Nat Methods, 2007, 4 (10): 787-797
6. Perkins D N, Pappin D J, Creasy D M, et al. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis, 1999, 20 (18): 3551-3567
7. Eng J K, McCormack A L, Yates III J R. An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a proteins database. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom, 1994, 5 (11): 976-989
8. Craig R, Beavis R C. TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics, 2004, 20 (9): 1466-1467
9. Keller A, Nesvizhskii A I, Kolker E, et al. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal Chem, 2002, 74 (20): 5383 -5392
10. Sadygov R G, Yates III J R. A hypergeometric probability model for protein identification and validation using tandem mass spectral data and protein sequence databases. Anal Chem, 2003, 75 (15): 3792-3798
11. Elias J E, Haas W, Faherty B K, et al. Comparative evaluation of mass spectrometry platforms used in large-scale proteomics investigations. Nat Methods, 2005, 2 (9): 667-675
12. Elias J E, Gygi S P. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat Methods, 2007, 4 (3): 207-214
13. Ramos-Fernandez A, Paradela A, Navajas R, et al. Generalized method for probability-based peptide and protein identification from tandem mass spectrometry data and sequence database searching. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2008, 7 (9): 1748-1754
14. Nesvizhskii A I, Aebersold R. Interpretation of shotgun proteomic data: the protein inference problem. Mol Cell Prot, 2005, 4 (10): 1419-1440
15. Yang X, Dondeti V, Dezube R, et al. DBParser: web-based software for shotgun proteomic data analyses. J Proteome Res, 2004, 3 (5): 1002-1008
16. Slotta D J, McFarland M, Makusky A, et al. P18-T Mass Sieve: a new tool for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. J Biom Tech, 2007, 18 (1): 7
17. Kristensen D B, Brond J C, Nielsen P A, et al. Experimental peptide identification repository (EPIR): an integrated peptide-centric platform for validation and mining of tandem mass spectrometry data. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2004, 3 (10): 1023-1038
18. Resing K A, Meyer-Arendt K, Mendoza A M, et al. Improving reproducibility and sensitivity in identifying human proteins by shotgun proteomics. Anal Chem, 2004, 76 (13): 3556-3568
19. Tabb D L, McDonald W H, Yates III J R. DTASelect and Contrast: tools for assembling and comparing protein identifications from shotgun proteomics. J Proteome Res, 2002, 1 (1): 21-26
20. Stephan C, Reidegeld K A, Hamacher M, et al. Automated reprocessing pipeline for searching heterogeneous mass spectrometric data of the HUPO brain proteome project pilot phase. Proteomics, 2006, 6 (18): 5015-5029
21. Hamacher M, Apweiler R, Arnold G, et al. HUPO brain proteome project: summary of the pilot phase and introduction of a comprehensive data reprocessing strategy. Proteomics, 2006, 6 (18): 4890-4898
22. Zhang B, Chambers M, Tabb D. Proteomic parsimony through bipartite graph analysis improves accuracy and transparency. J Proteome Res, 2007, 6 (9): 3549-3557
23. Moore R E, Young M K, Lee T D. Qscore: an algorithm for evaluating SEQUEST database search results. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom, 2002, 13 (4): 378-386
24. Kislinger T, Rahman K, Radulovic D, et al. PRISM, a generic large scale proteomic investigation strategy for mammals. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2003, 2 (2): 96-106
25. Nesvizhskii A I, Keller A, Kolker E, et al. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem, 2003, 75 (17): 4646-4658
26. Sadygov R G, Liu H, Yates J R. Statistical models for protein validation using tandem mass spectral data and protein amino acid sequence databases. Anal Chem, 2004, 76 (6): 1664-1671
27. Feng J, Naiman D Q, Cooper B. Probability model for assessing proteins assembled from peptide sequences inferred from tandem mass spectrometry data. Anal Chem, 2007, 79 (10): 3901-3911
28. Price T S, Lucitt M B, Wu W, et al. EBP, a program for protein identification using multiple tandem mass spectrometry datasets. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2007, 6 (3): 527-536
29. Zhang Q, Menon R, Deutsch E, et al. A mouse plasma peptide atlas as a resource for disease proteomics. Genome Biology, 2008, 9 (6): R93
30. Cormen T H, Leiserson C E, Rivest R L, et al. Introduction to Algorithms. 2nd. Cambridge: MIT Press and McGraw-Hill, 2001. 1033-1039
31. Padliya N D, Garrett W M, Campbell K B, et al. Tandem mass spectrometry for the detection of plant pathogenic fungi and the effects of database composition on protein inferences. Proteomics, 2007, 7 (21): 3932-3942
32. Tang H, Arnold R J, Alves P, et al. A computational approach toward label-free protein quantification using predicted peptide detectability. Bioinformatics, 2006, 22 (14): e481-e488
33. Alves P, Arnold R J, Novotny M V, et al. Advancement in protein inference from shotgun proteomics using peptide detectability. Pac Symp Biocomput, 2007.409-420
34. Ashburner M, Ball C A, Blake J A, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium Nat Genet, 2000, 25(1): 25-29
35. Peri S, Navarro J D, Kristiansen T Z, et al. Human protein reference database as a discovery resource for proteomics. Nucl Acids Res, 2004, 32 (suppl 1): D497-D501
36. Lucitt M B, Price T S, Pizarro A, et al. Analysis of the zebrafish proteome during embryonic development. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2008, 7 (5): 981-994
37. States D J, Omenn G S, Blackwell T W, et al. Challenges in deriving high-confidence protein identifications from data gathered by a HUPO plasma proteome collaborative study. Nat Biotechnol, 2006, 24 (3): 333-338
38. Adamski M, Blackwell T, Menon R, et al. Data management and preliminary data analysis in the pilot phase of the HUPO plasma proteome project. Proteomics, 2005, 5(13): 3246-3261
39. Rohrbough J G, Breci L, Merchant N, et al. Verification of single-peptide protein identifications by the application of complementary database search algorithms. J Biomol Tech, 2006, 17 (5): 327-332
40. Weatherly D B, Astwood III J A, Minning T A, et al. A Heuristic method for assigning a false-discovery rate for protein identifications from Mascot database search results. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2005, 4 (6): 762-772
41. Xue X, Wu S, Wang Z, et al. Protein probabilities in shotgun proteomics: evaluating different estimation methods using a semi-random sampling model. Proteomics, 2006, 6 (23): 6134 -6145