Getting a grip on tangible interaction: A framework on physical space and social interaction

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn 1, Issue , 2006, Pages 437-446

  Hornecker, Eva ^a   Buur, Jacob ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Analysis; Collaboration; CSCW; Design; Framework; Social Interaction; Tangible Interaction; Tangible Interface

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; DESIGN; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); SOCIAL ASPECTS;

COLLABORATION; SOCIAL INTERACTION; TANGIBLE INTERACTION; TANGIBLE INTERFACE;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 33745861384     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Arias, E., Eden, H. and Fischer, G. Enhancing Communication, Facilitating Shared Understanding, and Creating Better Artifacts by Integrating Physical and Computational Media for Design'. Proc. of DIS '97, ACM (1997), 1-12.
2. Beaudouin-Lafon M. Instrumental Interaction: An Interaction Model for Designing Post-WIMP User Interfaces. Proc. of CHI'00, ACM (2000), 446-453.
3. Benford, S., et al. Expected, sensed, and desired: A framework for designing sensing-based interaction, TOCHI, 12(1), ACM Press, 2005, 3-30.
4. Bongers, B. Interactivating Spaces. Proc. Symposium on Systems Research in the Arts, Informatics and Cybernetics (2002).
5. Buur, J., Jensen, M.V. and Djajadiningrat, T. Handsonly scenarios and video action walls: novel methods for tangible user interaction design. Proc. of DIS'04. ACM (2004), 185-192.
6. Ciolfi, L. Situating 'Place' in Interaction Design: Enhancing the User Experience in Interactive Environments. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Limerick (2004).
7. Cohen J., Withgott M. and Piernot P. Logjam: A tangible multi-person interface for video logging. Proc. of CHI'99, ACM (1999), 128-135.
8. Djajadiningrat, T., Overbeeke, K. and Wensveen, S. But how, Donald, tell us how? Proc. of DIS'02, ACM (2002), 285-291.
9. Dourish P. Where the Action Is. The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press (2001).
10. Eden H., Hornecker E. and Scharff E. Multilevel Design and Role Play. Proc. of DIS'02, ACM (2002), 387-392.
11. Erickson, T. From Interface to Interplace: The Spatial Environment as a Medium for Interaction. Proc. Conf. on Spatial Information Theory (1993), 391-405.
12. Fishkin, K. A. Taxonomy for and Analysis of Tangible Interfaces. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 8(5) (2004) 347-358.
13. Fitzmaurice G. W. Graspable User Interfaces. PhD thesis, University of Toronto, Canada (1996).
14. Fitzpatrick, G. The Locales Framework. Kluwer (2003).
15. Gaver, W. Affordances for Interaction: The Social is Material for Design. Ecological Psychology 8 (2), (1996) 111-129.
16. Hollan J. D., Hutchins E., and Kirsh D. Distributed cognition: A new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM ToCHI 7 (2) 2000, 174-196.
17. Holmquist L. E., Redström J. and Ljungstrand P. Tokenbased access to digital information, Proc. of HUC'99, Springer (1999). 234-245.
18. Holmquist, L., Schmidt, A. and Ullmer, B. Tangible interfaces in perspective: Guest editors' introduction. Personal & Ubiquitous Computing 8(5) (2004) 291-293.
19. Hornecker, E. Tangible User Interfaces als kooperationsunterstützendes Medium. PhD-thesis. University of Bremen (2004).
20. Hornecker, E. A Design Theme for Tangible Interaction: Embodied Facilitation. Proc. of ECSCW'05, Springer (2005). 23-43.
21. Hornecker, E. and Bruns F.W. Interaktion im Sensoric Garden, i-com Vol 1 (2005), 4-11.
22. Hornecker, E. and Stifter, M. Evaluationsstudie Ausstellung medien.welten. Technisches Museum Wien. Project report TU Vienna & TMW (2004).
23. Hutchins, E. Cognition in the Wild, MIT Press (1995).
24. Jensen, M.V., Buur, J. and Djajadiningrat, T. Desiging the user actions in tangible interaction. Proc. of Critical Computing Aarhus 2005. ACM (2005). 9-18.
25. Kirsh, D. The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence 73 (1-2), 1995, 31-68.
26. Price, S. and Rogers, Y. Lets get physical: the learning benefits of interacting in digitally-augmented physical spaces. Computers & Education 15(2). (2004) 169-185.
27. Robertson T. Cooperative Work and Lived Cognition. A Taxonomy of Embodied Actions. Proc. of E-CSCW'97, Kluwer (1997), 205-220.
28. Rubidge, S. and MacDonald, A. Sensuous Geographies: a multi-user interactive/responsive installation. Digital Creativity Vol 15, No. 4, 2004, 245-252.
29. Scott, S., Grant, K., and Mandryk R. System Guidelines for Co-located, Collaborative Work on a Tabletop Display. Proc. of E-CSCW'03. Kluwer (2003).
30. Sharlin, E., et al. On tangible user interfaces, humans and spatiality. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 8(5) (2004), 338-346.
31. Stanton, D. et al. Classroom Collaboration in the Design of Tangible Interfaces for Storytelling. Proc. of CHI'01, ACM (2001) 482-489.
32. Suzuki H. and Kato H. Interaction-level support for collaborative learning: Algoblocks - an open programming language. Proc. of CSCL (1995), 349-355.
33. Ullmer, B. Tangible Interfaces for Manipulating Aggregates of Digital Information. PhD thesis. MIT Media Lab (2002).
34. Ullmer B. and Ishii H. Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces. IBM Systems Journal 39(3-4) (2000), 915-931.
35. Wensveen, S., Djajadiningrat, T., and Overbeeke, C. Interaction Frogger - a Design Framework. Proc. of DIS'04, ACM (2004), 177-184.
36. Williams, A., Kabisch, E. and Dourish. P. From Interaction to Participation: Configuring Space Through Embodied Interaction. Proc. UbiComp '05. ACM (2005), 287-304.