Targeted high and low speech frequency bands to right and left ears respectively improve task performance and perceived sociability in dyadic conversations

Laterality

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 423-440

  Gregory Jr , Stanford W ^a   Kalkhoff, Will ^a   Harkness, Sarah K ^b   Paull, Jessica L ^a  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dichotic listening; Hemisphere specialization; Speech lateralization; Speech perception; Task performance

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; AUDITORY LATERALIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVERSATION; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; SPEECH; VALIDATION STUDY; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DICHOTIC LISTENING; EAR; HUMAN RELATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMMUNICATION; DICHOTIC LISTENING TESTS; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; EAR; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 69849095618     PISSN: 1357650X     EISSN: 14640678     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13576500802598181     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Asbjornsen, A. E., & Helland, T. (2006). Dichotic listening predicts language comprehension. Laterality, 11, 251-262.
2. Belin, P., Fecteau, S., & Bedard, C. (2004). Thinking the voice: Neural correlates of voice perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8 129-135.
3. Binder, J. R., Frost, J. A., Hammeke, T. A., Bellgowan, P. S. F., Springer, J. A., Kaufman, J. N., et al. (2000). Human temporal lobe activation by speech and nonspeech sounds. Cerebral Cortex Monographs, 10, 512-528.
4. Boemio, A., Fromm, S., Braun, A., & Poeppel, D. (2005). Hierarchical and asymmetric temporal sensitivity in human auditory cortices. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 389-395.
5. Bradshaw, J. L., & Nettleton, N. C. (1983). Human cerebral asymmetry Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6. Brancucci, A., Babiloni, C., Vecchio, F., Galderisi, S.,Mucci, A., Tecchio, F., et al. (2005). Decrease of functional coupling between left and right auditory cortices during dichotic listening: An electroencephalography study. Neuroscience, 136, 323-332.
7. Bryden, M. P. (1988). An overview of the dichotic listening procedure and its relation to cerebral organization. In K. Hugdahl (Ed.), Handbook of dichotic listening (pp. 1-44). New York: Wiley and Sons.
8. Cardinal, R. N., & Aitken, M. R. F. (2006). ANOVA for the behavioural sciences researcher. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
9. Curry, F. K. W. A. (1967). A comparison of left-handed and right-handed subjects on verbal and non-verbal dichotic listening tasks. Cortex, 3, 343-352.
10. Elias, l. (2003). The right shift theory. Laterality, 8, 291-295.
11. Elias, L. J., Bulman-Fleming, M. B., & McManus, I. C. (1999). Visual temporal asymmetries are related to asymmetries in linguistic perception. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1243-1249.
12. Ernhan, H., Borod, J. C., Tenke, C. E., & Bruder, G. E. (1998). Identification of emotion in a dichotic listening task: Event related brain potential and behavioural findings. Brain and Cognition, 37, 286-307.
13. Friederici, A. D., & Alter, K. (2004). Lateralisation of auditory language functions: A dynamic dual pathway model. Brain and Language, 89, 267-276.
14. Fry, D. B. (1979). The physics of speech. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Gazzaniga, M. S. (1970). The bisected brain. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
16. Gazzaniga, M. S. (2000). Cerebral specialization and interhemispheric communication - Does the corpus callosum enable the human condition? Brain, 123, 1293-1326.
17. Giraud, A., Kleinschmidt, A., Poeppel, D., Lund, T. E., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Laufs, H. (2007). Endogenous cortical rhythms determine cerebral specialization for speech perception and production. Neuron, 56, 1127-1134.
18. Gray, C. M., & McCormick, D. A. (1996). Chattering cells: Superficial pyramidal neurons contributing to the generation of synchronous oscillations in the visual cortex. Science, 274, 109-113.
19. Gregory, S. W. Jr. (1983). A quantitative analysis of temporal symmetry in microsocial relations. American Sociological Review, 48, 129-135.
20. Gregory, S. W. Jr. (1990). Analysis of fundamental frequency reveals covariation in interview partners' speech. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 14, 237-251.
21. Gregory, S. W. Jr. (1994). Sounds of power and deference: Acoustic analysis of macro social constraints on micro interaction. Sociological Perspectives, 37, 497-526.
22. Gregory, S. W. Jr., Dagan, K., & Webster, S. W. (1997). Evaluating the relation of vocal accommodation in conversation partners' fundamental frequencies to perceptions of communication quality. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 21, 23-43.
23. Gregory, S. W. Jr., & Gallagher, T. J. (2002). Spectral analysis of candidates' nonverbal vocal communication: Predicting U.S. presidential election outcomes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 65(3), 298-308.
24. Gregory, S.W. Jr., Green, B. E., Carrothers, R.M., Dagan, J. A., & Webster, S.W. (2001). Verifying the primacy of voice fundamental frequency in social status accommodation. Language and Communication, 21, 37-60.
25. Gregory, S. W. Jr., & Hoyt, B. R. (1982). Conversation partner mutual adaptation as demonstrated by Fourier series analysis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 11, 35-46.
26. Gregory, S. W. Jr., & Webster, S. W. (1996). A nonverbal signal in voices of interview partners effectively predicts communication accommodation and social status perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1231-1240.
27. Gregory, S. W. Jr., Webster, S. W., & Huang, G. (1993). Voice pitch and amplitude convergence as a metric of quality in dyadic interviews. Language and Communication, 13, 195-217.
28. Hellige, J. B. (2002). Hemispheric specialization: Contemporary issues. Revue de Neuropsychologie, 12, 7-49.
29. Hugdahl, K. (1988). Handbook of dichotic listening. New York: Wiley & Sons.
30. 15O-PET study. Neuropsychologia, 37, 431-440.
31. Ivry, R. B., & Lebby, P. C. (1993). Hemispheric differences in auditory perception are similar to those found in visual perception. Psychological Science, 4, 41-45.
32. Ivry, R. B., & Robertson, L. C. (1998). The two sides of perception Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Jaffe, J. (1978). Parliamentary procedure and the brain. In A. W. F. Siegman, S. (Ed.), Nonverbal behaviour & communication (pp. 55-56). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
34. Jaffe, J., & Feldstein, S. (1970). Rhythms of dialogue. New York: Academic Press.
35. Jancke, L., Buchanan, T. W., Lutz, K., & Shah, N. J. (2001). Focused and nonfocused attention in verbal and emotional dichotic listening: An FMRI study. Brain and Language, 78, 349-363.
36. Jancke, L., Karsten, S., Shah, J. N., & Hugdahl, K. (2003). Focused attention in a simple dichotic listening task: An fMRI experiment. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 257-266.
37. Kimura, D. (1963). Speech lateralisation in young children as determined by an auditory task. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 56, 899-902.
38. Kimura, D. (1964). Left-right differences in the perception of melodies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 355-358.
39. Kimura, D. (1967). Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening. Cortex, 3, 163-178.
40. Kimura, D. (1973a). The asymmetry of the human brain. Scientific American, 228, 70-78.
41. Kimura, D. (1973b).Manual activity during speaking. I. Right handers. Neuropsychologia, 11, 45-50.
42. Kramer, E. (1963). Judgment of personal characteristics and emotions from nonverbal properties of speech. Psychological Bulletin, 60 408-420.
43. Levy, J. (1974). Psychobiological implications of bilateral asymmetry. In S. J. D. J. G. Beaumont (Ed.), Hemisphere function in the human brain (pp. 121-183). London: P. Elek.
44. McManus, C. (2002). Right hand, left hand. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45. Meador, K. J., Allison, J. D., Loring, D. W., Lavin, T. B., & Pillai, J. J. (2002). Journal topography of somatosensory processing: Cerebral lateralisation and focused attention. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8, 349-359.
46. Moallef, P., & Humphries, T. (2003). Theory of mind deficits in nonverbal learning disability and the role of the right cerebral hemisphere. Brain and Cognition, 51, 227-229.
47. Natsopoulos, D., Koutselini, M., Kiosseoglou, G., & Koundouris, F. (2002). Differences in language performance in variations of lateralisation. Brain and Language, 82, 223-240.
48. Nicholls, M E. R. (1996). Temporal processing asymmetries between the cerebral hemispheres: Evidence and implications. Laterality, 1 97-139.
49. Oldfield, R. C. (1970). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
50. Peretz, I., & Zatorre, R. J. (2005). Brain organization for music processing. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 89-114.
51. Popper, K. R., & Eccles, J. C. (1977). The self and its brain. Berlin: Springer International.
52. Rimol, L. M., Eichele, T., & Hugdahl, K. (2005). The effect of voice-onset-time on dichotic listening with consonant-vowel syllables. Neuropsychologia, 44, 191-196.
53. Rosenzweig, M. R. (1951). Representations of the two ears at the auditory cortex. American Journal of Physiology, 167, 147-158.
54. Scherer, K. R., Koivumaki, J., & Rosenthal, R. (1972). Minimal cues in the vocal communication of affect: Judging emotions from content-based speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1, 269-285.
55. Schneider, P., Sluming, V., Roberts, N., Scherg, M., Goebel, R., Specht, H. J., et al. (2005). Structural and functional asymmetry of lateral Heschl's gyrus reflects pitch perception preference. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1241-1247.
56. Shirmer, A., Alter, K., & Katz, S. S. (2001). Lateralisation of prosody during language production: A lesion study. Brain and Language, 76, 1-17.
57. Snow, D. (2000). The emotional basis of linguistic and nonlinguistic intonation: Implications for hemispheric specialization. Developmental Neuropsychology, 17, 257-261.
58. Sperry, R. W. (1959). The growth of nerve circuits. Scientific American, 201, 68-75.
59. Springer, S., & Deutsch, G. (1993). Left brain, right brain (4th ed). New York: W. H. Freeman.
60. Starkweather, J. A. (1956). Content-free speech as a source of information about the speaker. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 394-402.
61. Starkweather, J. A. (1967). Vocal behaviour as an information channel of speaker status. In K. Salzinger & S. Salzinger (Eds.), Research in verbal behaviour and some neurophysiological implications (pp. 253-265). New York: Academic Press.
62. Taub, R. D., Buhl, E. H., Gloveli, T., & Whittington, M. A. (2003). Fast rhythmic bursting can be induced in layer 2/3 cortical neurons by enhancing persistent Na+ conductance or by blocking BK channels. Journal of Neurophysiology, 89, 909-921.
63. Taylor, K. I., & Regard, M. (2003). Language in the right cerebral hemisphere: Contributions from reading studies. News in Physiological Sciences, 18, 257-261.
64. Tervaniemi, M., & Hugdahl, K. (2003). Lateralisation of auditory cortex functions. Brain Research Reviews, 43, 231-246.
65. Toga, A. W., & Thompson, P. M. (2003). Mapping brain asymmetry. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 37-48.
66. VanLancker, D. R., & Kempler, D. (1987). Comprehension of familiar phrases by left-hemisphere but not by right-hemisphere damaged patients. Brain and Language, 32, 265-277.
67. Vogel, J. J., Bowers, C. A., & Vogel, D. S. (2003). Cerebral lateralisation of spatial abilities: A metaanalysis. Brain and Cognition, 52, 197-204.
68. Wray, A. (1992). The focusing hypothesis. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.